Bug#620960: RFS: inspircd
Hi! On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 22:00 +0100, Guillaume Delacour wrote: To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/inspircd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/inspircd/inspircd_2.0.5-1.dsc It seems you've replaced that package with a new one on 2011-11-30. Did you want to that one uploaded, too? From the changelog it seems that you intend to maintain it as a pkg-irc team member, so I'd offer to review and upload it if you don't find a sponsor in your team. Best regards, Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#650798: Uploaded to DELAYED/10
Hi! I've uploaded this NMU to the DELAYED/10 queue. In case this someone objects to it, please contact me. Regards, Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#650363: Invalid
As Julien wrote, /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/mga_drv.so is not a VA-API driver. According to http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/vaapi there is no driver for Matrox MGA and there is also no mga_drv_video.so in Debian sid: jluebbe@polaris: ~ $ apt-file search mga_drv_video.so jluebbe@polaris: ~ $ apt-file search drv_video.so i965-va-driver: /usr/lib/dri/i965_drv_video.so libva1: /usr/lib/dri/dummy_drv_video.so vdpau-va-driver: /usr/lib/dri/nvidia_drv_video.so vdpau-va-driver: /usr/lib/dri/s3g_drv_video.so vdpau-va-driver: /usr/lib/dri/vdpau_drv_video.so xvba-va-driver: /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_drv_video.so xvba-va-driver: /usr/lib/dri/xvba_drv_video.so jluebbe@polaris: ~ $ Thus, this bug should be closed. Regrads, Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556860: Your 'fix' broke KVM
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 12:25 -0500, Ron Watkins wrote: By adding your conflict with KVM, you're now breaking systems, if the administrators aren't paying attention. People running KVM, if they want to KEEP running KVM, can't update QEMU. There is no non-conflicting version of KVM available anywhere in testing or unstable. For unstable you could try the qemu-kvm package, which also has newer code than the kvm package. Since not even unstable has a version of KVM that works with your package, pushing that conflict down into testing is just inane. We're broken and we can't fix it without going into experimental, and even at that, a simple apt-get update/install won't work. It looks like we'll have to manually go get the package and install it. KVM is tightly coupled to QEMU; it *requires* QEMU to work. You've added a conflict with a *dependent* package? What the hell are you thinking? Neither qemu-kvm or kvm need the qemu package, the modified qemu source is 'self-contained' in qemu-kvm or kvm. If you want to rearchitect your software and add conflicts, *coordinate it with the people you're conflicting with*, especially when they're married to your project at the freaking hip. You need to release at the same time, or people end up stuck. As soon as qemu-kvm has had some more testers, it will replace the old kvm package in unstable (and then testing). -- Jan Lübbe jlue...@lasnet.dehttp://sicherheitsschwankung.de gpg-key 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20 fingerprint 1B25 F91F 9E7B 5D4F 1282 02D6 8A83 8BE4 D848 0F2E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#533427: lyx: Uninstallable in unstable, libboost-regex1.34.1 missing
Package: lyx Version: 1.6.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying install lyx i get the following error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: lyx: Depends: libboost-regex1.34.1 (= 1.34.1-8) but it is not installable -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-polaris (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#528519: kvm: FTBFS with 2.6.29
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:21 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: kvm doesn't build with 2.6.29. Which version? 72 or 84? I'll upload 85 soon (TM), which works with 2.6.29. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#512696: Resolved upstream
Upstream marked the mentioned #1744 as a duplicate of http://intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1703 which has been closed (and marked verified) in 228.57.2.23. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#512654: Acknowledgement ([kvm] Security patch for CVE-2008-0928 causes serious regression)
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 20:56 +0100, Torsten Marek wrote: There seems to be another problem in kvm-82 with regard to image corruption, I'm using a qcow2 image backed by another qcow2 one. I was able to install Windows XP and apply all patches etc, but soon after that, chkdsk started reporting errors. This was without the security patch for CVE-2008-0928? -- Jan Lübbe jlue...@lasnet.dehttp://sicherheitsschwankung.de gpg-key 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20 fingerprint 1B25 F91F 9E7B 5D4F 1282 02D6 8A83 8BE4 D848 0F2E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#470384:
I will upload a dfsg clean tarball as a NMU, the only change to the diff is the changelog entry. $ debdiff libsmi_0.4.7-1.dsc libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.1.dsc | diffstat debian/changelog |8 doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-smi-xml-00.txt | 672 doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-smi-xml-01.txt | 1008 -- doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-sming-02.txt | 5880 - doc/smi.dtd| 275 - 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7835 deletions(-) $ debdiff libsmi_0.4.7-1.dsc libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.1.dsc diff -Nru libsmi-0.4.7/debian/changelog libsmi-0.4.7+dfsg/debian/changelog --- libsmi-0.4.7/debian/changelog 2008-08-05 00:27:34.0 +0200 +++ libsmi-0.4.7+dfsg/debian/changelog 2008-08-05 00:27:36.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libsmi (0.4.7+dfsg-0.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Repack the upstream tarball to drop non-free IETF documents (closes: +#470384) + + -- Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:34:25 +0200 + libsmi (0.4.7-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru libsmi-0.4.7/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-sming-02.txt libsmi-0.4.7+dfsg/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-sming-02.txt --- libsmi-0.4.7/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-sming-02.txt 2005-11-25 10:14:01.0 +0100 +++ libsmi-0.4.7+dfsg/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-sming-02.txt 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 @@ -1,5880 +0,0 @@ - - -Network Working Group F. Strauss -Internet-Draft TU Braunschweig -Expires: August 15, 2000 February 15, 2000 ... Jan Lübbe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#470664:
It is possible to use 'qcow2' instead of 'qcow'. Current 'qcow' images can be converted using kvm-img. I'll lower the severity to important, as it does not render the package unusable. When a good fix for CVE-2009-0928 is available, 'qcow' should work again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479228:
Hi! I've tried to reproduce it on my machines (32bit chroot with 64bit kernel on amd64, 32bit core duo) and everything seemed ok. Do you have some additional information on how to reproduce it? Anything that is different on your machines? Does it work when you use upstream's tarball? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#467260: Same here with 2.6.25
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 18:03 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: I get the same problem, which I manage to work around with: m-a -t clean kvm-source; m-a -t a-i kvm-source -t is probably not needed, it's just my preference. This is a problem in m-a: It does not remove the old module before extracting the new one. The 2.6.25 kernel is the package from sid. There was a kvm module loaded before I built the module, I have no idea if that came with the kernel package, but it prevented the newly built kvm from loading. I unloaded that, and loaded the newly built module, and it worked. The Debian kernel in sid now comes with kvm modules. I'm not sure if there is a way to define priorities. -- Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sicherheitsschwankung.de gpg-key 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20 fingerprint 1B25 F91F 9E7B 5D4F 1282 02D6 8A83 8BE4 D848 0F2E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472343: gitosis: Creates a user called git without checking for it first
Package: gitosis
Version: 0.2+20080319-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The postinst script contains:
case ${1} in
configure)
adduser --system --home /var/cache/git --shell /bin/sh
--disabled-password --no-create-home --gecos 'git version control' --group git
mkdir -p /var/cache/git
chown git:git /var/cache/git -R
;;
This creates the 'git' user unconditionally, which breaks upgrading the package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-x60s (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456413: cs89x0 driver in etherboot
Hello Russ, Your driver for the cs89x0 network card is used in the etherboot package. The copyright/license statements are a bit problematic for Debian as cs89x0.h file states This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, version 1. This license statement is currently also in the Linux kernel source (which makes it incompatible to the rest of Linux). This license makes it incompatible with the rest of etherboot which is GPLv2. cs89x0.c states: Permission is granted to distribute the enclosed cs89x0.[ch] driver only in conjunction with the Etherboot package. The code is ordinarily distributed under the GPL. Could you please clarify what you mean by only in conjunction with the Etherboot package, as this conflicts with the GPL. Would you be willing to relicense your contributions under the GPLv2 without additional restrictions? -- Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sicherheitsschwankung.de gpg-key 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20 fingerprint 1B25 F91F 9E7B 5D4F 1282 02D6 8A83 8BE4 D848 0F2E
Bug#469125: kvm/63+dfsg-1 with fixed bug again...
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 13:48 +0100, Thomas Besser wrote: Hadn't time to test the fixed kvm/62+dfsg-3 source package last week, as today already the next kvm version is available in unstable. Unfortunately with the old recently fixed bug (dependency etherboot does not exist in amd64) in source package. I'm building the arch-all package kvm-data on i386. This seems the only way to get the etherboot files. You can build only the arch-dependant part and use the kvm-data package from the debian archive. -- Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sicherheitsschwankung.de gpg-key 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20 fingerprint 1B25 F91F 9E7B 5D4F 1282 02D6 8A83 8BE4 D848 0F2E
Bug#470664: kvm: can't boot with qcow image
This problem is caused by the fix for #469666. I'm still investigating on how to solve this regression. -- Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sicherheitsschwankung.de gpg-key 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20 fingerprint 1B25 F91F 9E7B 5D4F 1282 02D6 8A83 8BE4 D848 0F2E
Bug#452963:
I'll apply your patch as soon as we have the qemu-patched bios in debian. -- Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#438995: closed by Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 16:48 +0100, Johannes Graumann wrote: And how does that relate to my report? You should be able to compile kvm modules for the debian stock kernels now, because it no longer needs CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G set in the kernel. Perhaps i've misunderstood your bugreport. Do you need kvm version 28 specifically? -- Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sicherheitsschwankung.de gpg-key 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20 fingerprint 1B25 F91F 9E7B 5D4F 1282 02D6 8A83 8BE4 D848 0F2E
Bug#451068: kvm: black screen while run windowsxp
I've just uploaded the current upstream version (52) to unstable. Could you try to reproduce the problem with that version? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#377432: pida: Won't start
You have python-setuptools from stable (see http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-setuptools.html). That version is not compatible with the recent changes in python packageing. Please try it with a current version of python-setuptools. On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 23:29 +0200, randhol wrote: Versions of packages pida depends on: ii python-gtk2 [python2.4-gt 2.8.6-3Python bindings for the GTK+ widge ii python2.4 2.4.3-7An interactive high-level object-o ii python2.4-setuptools 0.0.1.041214-1 Python Distutils Enhancements The current version is 0.6b3-3. ii python2.4-vte 1:0.12.1-1 Python bindings for the VTE widget ii vim-gtk [gvim]1:7.0-017+8Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - ii vim-python [gvim] 1:7.0-017+8Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - -- Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sicherheitsschwankung.de gpg-key 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20 fingerprint 1B25 F91F 9E7B 5D4F 1282 02D6 8A83 8BE4 D848 0F2E
