Bug#1054249: (no subject)
Can this solution be brought too bookworm, either through stable-updates (preferably) or otherwise backports? The current package is not useable.
Bug#1009417: saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
I will check.
The mRMR issue has been addressed. I will target a new release (and change
the build system to cmake, as autotools will be deprecated next release).
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:55 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> On 4/12/22 20:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> checking for python script directory (pythondir)...
> ${PYTHON_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> >> checking for python extension module directory (pyexecdir)...
> ${PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> >> checking for python3.10... (cached) /usr/bin/python3
> >> checking for a version of Python >= '2.1.0'... yes
> >> checking for the distutils Python package... no
> >> configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
> >> Please check your Python installation. The error was:
> >> :1: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and
> slated for removal in Python 3.12. Use setuptools or check PEP 632 for
> potential alternatives
>
> Johan can you fix this (upstream)?
>
> And has the mRMR license issue been addressed upstream to unblock
> updating the package to 8.x?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
> --
> GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
> Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
>
Bug#808248: SAGA 2.2.2 (source) contains non-free code
Source: saga Version: 2.2.2-1 Severity: serious While starting packaging SAGA 2.2.3 I noticed that the previous package somehow contains the files which should have been excluded as documented in the debian/copyright file. Note that this does not really affect the binary package as the code is not used in the build- the results should be identical. I'll proceed creating a package for SAGA 2.2.3, but I wanted to document this error in version 2.2.2-1 in Debian.
Bug#788408: rasterio: FTBFS w/cython 0.22.x
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Source: rasterio > Version: 0.15.1-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > > Builds of rasterio with cython 0.22.x have been failing because cython > now checks that signatures' and definitions' exception specifications agree: > This is fixed upstream: https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio/pull/373 I will fix this asap. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#754752: Shouldn't this bug be closed?
It seems that we have cython 0.21.1-1 built on mips in the archives now. I'm wondering if this bug should not be closed or downgraded now. Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#764353:
Thanks for your patch, It indeed looks logical, i've sent it upstream as well. I just started looking deeper into the issue on s390x. The issue is produced when running the fortran tests. Since fedora does not build fortran extensions for hdf4 their patches will not be of any use here. If I don't manage to find/receive a reasonable fix this week I think I will disable the failing test and upload a new version containing your fixes (and file a seperate bug for the disabled test). Johan On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:46 AM, wrote: > Hello Johan. > > I have applied one of the patches gathered from the link you sent. That > allowed the package to build successfully. > The other one does not seem to work. > The debdiff is attached to this msg. > > Regards. > > Fernando > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#758165: gcc-4.9 devirtualisation bug affecting wxwidgets3.0 now fixed
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:40:46PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:51:37PM -0300, Olly Betts wrote: >> > There's an issue with devirtualisation in GCC 4.9 which wx3 triggers, >> > which may be connected: >> > >> > https://bugs.debian.org/752733 >> >> This was fixed in gcc-4.9 4.9.1-14, so it would be useful to check if >> libwx-perl and sage now work OK on armel and armhf, or if there's >> something else going on here. > > I tried building libwx-perl on armel / abel.debian.org in a jessie chroot > (the build dependencies are uninstallable in sid right now), with gcc-4.9 > 4.9.1-16, and still got > > t/01_load.t ... 1/6 Can't load > '/home/ntyni/libwx-perl-0.9923/blib/arch/auto/Wx/PropertyGrid/PropertyGrid.so' > for module Wx::PropertyGrid: at > /home/ntyni/libwx-perl-0.9923/blib/lib/Wx/Mini.pm line 74. > > which looks like the problem is still present. On armhf, I managed to get saga gui linking again. Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#764353: libhdf4: FTBFS on s390x and ppc64el: test failures
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Breno Leitao wrote: > On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:12:32 +0200 Johan Van de Wauw > wrote: >> I'm aware of the issues. >> I've asked for porter access to see if I can fix these problems. > For what arch? For ppc64el, we have the machine pastel that is available as a > porterbox. > > Let me know if you are having access to it. I requested access for both ppc64el and s390x. If you already have access and would like to help, I'd recommend to look at fedora who most likely fixed these issues already: for ppc64el: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134385 for s390x : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099806 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#764353: libhdf4: FTBFS on s390x and ppc64el: test failures
I'm aware of the issues. I've asked for porter access to see if I can fix these problems. Johan On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Rebecca Palmer wrote: > Source: libhdf4 > Severity: serious > Version: 4.2.10-2 > > libhdf4 FTBFS in the (newly enabled) test suite on s390x and ppc64el. > > On s390x, the test setup program crashes: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libhdf4&arch=s390x&ver=4.2.10-2&stamp=1412545742 > > === > HDF Library Fortran Interface Tests Setup > === > *** Error in `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/HDF4.2.10/hdf/test/.libs/lt-fortestF': free(): > invalid next size (fast): 0xafeb3fd0 *** > > Program received signal SIGABRT: Process abort signal. > > Backtrace for this error: > #0 0x3FFFD066C57 > #1 0x3FFFD0673B5 > #2 0x39721F3 > #3 0x3FFFCE3340C > #4 0x3FFFCE34A0D > #5 0x3FFFCE7D491 > #6 0x3FFFCE83EFD > #7 0x3FFFCE84ED3 > #8 0x3FFFD2A38B1 > #9 0x3FFFD2A41FD > #10 0x80007DB5 in MAIN__ at fortestF.f:? > Aborted > > > On ppc64el, >> >> The testsuite went in a loop, so the log is too big to be sent (12GB). >> >> Aurelien > > > ___ > Pkg-grass-devel mailing list > pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#755361: saga: FTBFS on arm*: undefined reference to `wxCommandEvent::Clone() const'
As mentioned on the list I think this issue is due to a bug in gcc/wxwidgets. https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/08/msg00011.html As a workaround I will try building saga on arm/armel without gui support for now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#669468: saga: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvigraimpex-dev
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:39:19PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> > The following packages have unmet dependencies: >> > sbuild-build-depends-saga-dummy : Depends: libvigraimpex-dev but it is >> > not going to be installed >> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. >> > apt-get failed. > > It seems to me that both libtiff4-dev and libtiff5-dev are requested for > building which > leads to a failure. I think that a simple or dependency would be enough to > avoid problems. > The dependency on libvigraimpex-dev can be dropped. It is only used by one module. The configure script checks for the presence of the library, so in fact no other changes are needed. I'll fix it in git. Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
