Bug#1030670: Does not depend on libspng0

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: libspng-dev
Version: 0.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi Andrea!

While trying to build against the new libspng-dev, I found that even my
build was issuing -lspng, it would fail because it could not find it.

It turns out you're missing a dependency against libspng0 itself.

Patch attached for that.

Additionally, I've seen the following too:

- spng.pc declares:

Requires.private: zlib

If I understand correctly, this is not a public dependency, which means
libspng-dev does not need to depend on zlib-dev. In fact, that's one of
the features SPNG advertises.

- I would downgrade the Recommends on libspng-doc to a Suggests, to
  avoid pulling in fonts and other unneeded packages on the 95% of
  cases.

Thank you,
Jordi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=ca_ES:ca
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libspng-dev depends on:
ii  zlib1g-dev  1:1.2.13.dfsg-1

Versions of packages libspng-dev recommends:
pn  libspng-doc  

libspng-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- debian/control.orig 2023-02-02 20:38:28.0 +0100
+++ debian/control  2023-02-06 12:08:42.216466366 +0100
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 Architecture: any
 Multi-Arch: same
 Depends: zlib1g-dev,
+ libspng0 (= ${binary:Version}),
  ${misc:Depends}
 Recommends: libspng-doc
 Description: simple, modern libpng alternative - development

Bug#1021699: marked as pending in gimp

[Jordi Mallach]

Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1021699 in gimp reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gimp/-/commit/780c3d0084d9d99b1dcb15033283d4ed79278012


Add patch from git to fix building with libheif 1.13.0+.

Closes: #1021699.


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1021699

Bug#1015714: src:sogo: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: sogo
Followup-For: Bug #1015714

This has been worked around in 5.7.1-2, and SOGo has built on s390x and
other failing unofficial architectures where it was failing since 5.6.0.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.18.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=ca_ES:ca
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages sogo depends on:
ii  adduser 3.128
pn  gnustep-base-runtime
ii  init-system-helpers 1.64
ii  libc6   2.34-4
ii  libcrypt1   1:4.4.28-2
ii  libcurl47.84.0-2
ii  libgcc-s1   12.2.0-1
ii  libglib2.0-02.73.3-2
pn  libgnustep-base1.28 
pn  liblasso3   
pn  libmemcached11  
pn  liboath0
ii  libobjc412.2.0-1
pn  libsbjson2.3
ii  libsodium23 1.0.18-1
pn  libsope1
ii  libssl3 3.0.5-2
ii  libytnef0   2.0-1
ii  libzip4 1.7.3-1+b1
ii  lsb-base11.2
pn  memcached   
pn  sogo-common 
ii  systemd [systemd-tmpfiles]  251.4-1
ii  zip 3.0-12

sogo recommends no packages.

Versions of packages sogo suggests:
pn  postgresql | default-mysql-server | virtual-mysql-server  

Bug#1010856: Please make libjxl-dev depend on all required libraries

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: libjxl-dev
Version: 0.7.0~git20220325.7594374+ds-3
Severity: serious

While working on GIMP 3.0 packaging, I stumbled on:

configure:31882: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "libjxl >= 0.6.1"
Package libhwy was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libhwy.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'libhwy', required by 'libjxl', not found

Please add all the required -dev packages to libjxl-dev dependencies,
so building against libjxl is possible without adding any extra
Build-Deps.

The current version in experimental has the following in its .pc file:

Requires.private: libhwy libbrotlicommon libbrotlienc libbrotlidec lcms2

Thank you!
Jordi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.17.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=ca_ES:ca
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libjxl-dev depends on:
ii  libjxl0.7  0.7.0~git20220325.7594374+ds-3

libjxl-dev recommends no packages.

libjxl-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Bug#1003755: mailutils: mail(1) completely broken, fails with "undefined symbol: mu_stream_timed_getdelim" on start

[Jordi Mallach]

severity 1003755 normal
thanks

Hi,

El ds. 15 de 01 de 2022 a les 05:10 +0100, en/na наб va escriure:
> Package: mailutils
> Version: 1:3.14-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> I upgraded today;
> the changelog in my root mail (heh) shows just 1:3.14-1,
> so this is broken vs. previous (1:3.13-1).
> 
> When running mail(1), at all, it doesn't:
> -- >8 --
> $ mail
> mail: symbol lookup error: mail: undefined symbol:
> mu_stream_timed_getdelim
> $ date | mail -s test
> mail: symbol lookup error: mail: undefined symbol:
> mu_stream_timed_getdelim
> -- >8 --

I can't reproduce this.

One of these two might be important:

> Architecture: x32 (x86_64)

Ie, a x32 specific issue

Or more probably:

> Versions of packages mailutils depends on:
> ii  libmailutils8 1:3.13-1
> ii  mailutils-common  1:3.14-1

This version mismatch between mailutils and its libs.

It shouldn't happen, but if this is the problem, I'll look into it and
will tighten the dependency.


Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach 
Debian Project

Bug#996806: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Bug#996806: mailmain3: Expected test results for arc_validate tests need updating

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Pierre-Elliott!

El dj. 25 de 11 de 2021 a les 22:19 +0100, en/na Pierre-Elliott Bécue
va escriure:
> > I might try to work on a fix in the following days, most probably
> > including an update to the latest version, which includes other
> > fixes I
> > need.
> 
> I'm waiting for some stuck dependencies issues to solve to batch a
> full
> update of mailman3.

Sounds great! Do you have a list of missing deps?

-- 
Jordi Mallach 
Debian Project

Bug#996806: mailmain3: Expected test results for arc_validate tests need updating

[Jordi Mallach]

Source: mailman3
Version: 3.3.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #996806

Apparently this is fixed in upstream commit
f311b135fe13e3ec07ef2eedadba9c09b25e57ff

See

https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/commit/f311b135fe13e3ec07ef2eedadba9c09b25e57ff

for more details.

I might try to work on a fix in the following days, most probably
including an update to the latest version, which includes other fixes I
need.

Jordi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.15.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=ca_ES:ca
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Bug#989479: sogo: CVE-2021-33054

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Salvatore,

El dv. 04 de 06 de 2021 a les 23:07 +0200, en/na Salvatore Bonaccorso
va escriure:
> If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
> CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.
> 
> For further information see:
> 
> [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-33054
>     https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-33054
> [1]
> https://github.com/inverse-inc/sogo/commit/e53636564680ac0df11ec898304bc442908ba746
> 
> Please adjust the affected versions in the BTS as needed.

I have prepared a source package for bullseye, with a debdiff attached.

I have built it in a bullseye chroot, but I assume you'll want a source
only upload.

I'll upload as soon as you ack it, and will prepare a similar package
for buster at your request.

Thanks,
Jordi


-- 
Jordi Mallach 
Debian Project

Bug#989479: sogo: CVE-2021-33054

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi,

El dj. 11 de 11 de 2021 a les 22:07 +0100, en/na Jordi Mallach va
escriure:
> Hi Salvatore,
> 
> El dv. 04 de 06 de 2021 a les 23:07 +0200, en/na Salvatore Bonaccorso
> va escriure:
> > If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
> > CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog
> > entry.
> > 
> > For further information see:
> > 
> > [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-33054
> >     https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-33054
> > [1]
> > https://github.com/inverse-inc/sogo/commit/e53636564680ac0df11ec898304bc442908ba746
> > 
> > Please adjust the affected versions in the BTS as needed.
> 
> I have prepared a source package for bullseye, with a debdiff
> attached.

Now attached...

Jordi

-- 
Jordi Mallach 
Debian Project
diff -Nru sogo-5.0.1/debian/changelog sogo-5.0.1/debian/changelog
--- sogo-5.0.1/debian/changelog	2021-02-02 01:28:14.0 +0100
+++ sogo-5.0.1/debian/changelog	2021-11-11 21:44:21.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+sogo (5.0.1-4+deb11u1) bullseye-security; urgency=high
+
+  * [CVE-2021-33054] fixes validation of SAML message signatures
+(closes: #989479)
+  * Switch gbp debian branch to bullseye.
+
+ -- Jordi Mallach   Thu, 11 Nov 2021 21:44:21 +0100
+
 sogo (5.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Build against OpenSSL, now that ftpmaster considers it a system
diff -Nru sogo-5.0.1/debian/gbp.conf sogo-5.0.1/debian/gbp.conf
--- sogo-5.0.1/debian/gbp.conf	2019-10-31 09:28:21.0 +0100
+++ sogo-5.0.1/debian/gbp.conf	2021-11-11 21:43:53.0 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 [DEFAULT]
 pristine-tar = True
-debian-branch = debian
-upstream-branch=upstream
+debian-branch = bullseye
+upstream-branch = upstream
 upstream-vcs-tag = SOGo-%(version)s
diff -Nru sogo-5.0.1/debian/patches/cve-2021-33054.patch sogo-5.0.1/debian/patches/cve-2021-33054.patch
--- sogo-5.0.1/debian/patches/cve-2021-33054.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ sogo-5.0.1/debian/patches/cve-2021-33054.patch	2021-11-11 21:40:56.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+commit e53636564680ac0df11ec898304bc442908ba746
+Author: Francis Lachapelle 
+Date:   Mon May 17 10:10:01 2021 -0400
+
+fix(saml): don't ignore the signature of messages
+
+diff --git a/SoObjects/SOGo/SOGoSAML2Session.m b/SoObjects/SOGo/SOGoSAML2Session.m
+index 782bc1f2c..e07f84116 100644
+--- a/SoObjects/SOGo/SOGoSAML2Session.m
 b/SoObjects/SOGo/SOGoSAML2Session.m
+@@ -454,7 +454,6 @@ static NSMapTable *serverTable = nil;
+ 
+   responseData = strdup ([authnResponse UTF8String]);
+ 
+-  lasso_profile_set_signature_verify_hint(lassoLogin, LASSO_PROFILE_SIGNATURE_VERIFY_HINT_IGNORE);
+   rc = lasso_login_process_authn_response_msg (lassoLogin, responseData);
+   if (rc)
+ [NSException raiseSAML2Exception: rc];
diff -Nru sogo-5.0.1/debian/patches/series sogo-5.0.1/debian/patches/series
--- sogo-5.0.1/debian/patches/series	2021-02-02 01:28:14.0 +0100
+++ sogo-5.0.1/debian/patches/series	2021-11-11 21:41:21.0 +0100
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
 0008-Unset-MAKEFLAGS-and-MFLAGS-in-configure.patch
 0009-Omit-signedViewer-altogether-when-not-using-openssl.patch
 python3.patch
+cve-2021-33054.patch

Bug#971332: alsa-plugins: diff for NMU version 1.2.2-2.1

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Sebastian and Diederik,

Argh, I just noticed I was inconveniently unsubscribed from the alsa
mailing list.

El dg. 22 de 08 de 2021 a les 16:42 +0200, en/na Sebastian Ramacher va
escriure:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags -1 ftbfs
> 
> On 2021-08-21 14:30:43, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > On 15 Aug 2021 20:25:59 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
> >  wrote:
> > > Dear maintainer,
> > > 
> > > as I intend to upload ffmpeg without libavresample-dev soon, I've
> > > prepared an NMU for alsa-plugins (versioned as 1.2.2-2.1) and
> > > uploaded
> > > it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
> > > longer.
> > 
> > I just noticed that 1.2.5-1 has been uploaded to unstable:
> > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1249246/accepted-alsa-plugins-125-1-source-into-unstable/
> > 
> > Wouldn't that cause a problem/conflict with the NMU?
> 
> That means that the NMU will be rejected. Unfortunately the changes
> to
> switch to libswsample-dev were not included in 1.2.5-1. As ffmpeg
> without libavresample-dev is now in unstable, alsa-plugins now FTBFS.
> Hence raising the severity to serious.

Thanks for the heads up and for the NMU, I just uploaded 1.2.5-2 to
avert this crisis. I'm sorry this happened, the 1.2.5-1 had been
prepared for quite a few days before the upload so the timing of the
events was quite unfortunate.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach 
Debian Project

Bug#969498: marked as pending in mame

[Jordi Mallach]

Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #969498 in mame reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/mame/-/commit/a6b11dcbd1c5a4912b0b59938580db38a5ef2691


Fix mips64el build.

Fix mips64el build by adding DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mxgot
to it's arch config.

Thanks to Adrian Bunk for the fix (closes: #969498).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/969498

Bug#968883: mame FTBFS on !x86

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Adrian,

El dg. 23 de 08 de 2020 a les 08:45 +0300, en/na Adrian Bunk va
escriure:
> Source: mame
> Version: 0.223+dfsg.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=mame=0.223%2Bdfsg.1-1=sid
> 
> Errors look quite different on different architectures.

I'm aware, yes. I need to dig into this because it's most probably
related to build options applied to each arch that has changed
upstream. In any case, a new release is two days away, so I'll wait for
that first.

Thanks for the bug report,
Jordi

Bug#957517: mailutils: diff for NMU version 1:3.9-3.2

[Jordi Mallach]

Hey there,

El Llu 27 de 07 de 2020 a les 10:38 +0200, en/na Sebastian Ramacher va
escriure:
> Control: tags 957517 + patch
> 
> Dear maintainer,
> 
> I've prepared an NMU for mailutils (versioned as 1:3.9-3.2). The diff
> is attached to this message.

Thank you very much!

Jordi

-- 
Jordi Mallach 
Debian Project

Bug#963211: Still occurs in 1:3.9-3

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi, I'm away for the week so I'd welcome a nmu. I assume this just needs 
further bumping the breaks/replaces to - 3~, but have no means to test. 

El 25 de juny de 2020 14:58:05 CEST, Cyril Brulebois  ha 
escrit:
>Kyle Robbertze  (2020-06-23):
>> This error is still occurring:
>> 
>> > Unpacking libmu-dbm6:amd64 (1:3.9-3) ...
>> > dpkg: error processing archive
>/var/cache/apt/archives/libmu-dbm6_1%3a3.9-3_amd64.deb (--unpack):
>> >  trying to overwrite
>'/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmu_dbm.so.6.0.0', which is also in
>package libmailutils6:amd64 1:3.7-2.1
>> > dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken
>pipe)
>
>Confirmed while upgrading my sid devel chroot.
>
>Had to purge libmailutils6 (removing mailutils that depends on it) to
>get past this.
>
>
>Cheers,
>-- 
>Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
>D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

-- 
Enviat des del meu dispositiu Android amb el K-9 Mail. Disculpeu la brevetat.

Bug#944265: mailutils: local privilege escalation in maidag utility (fixed in 3.8)

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi all,

El dl. 11 de 11 de 2019 a les 21:32 +0100, en/na Salvatore Bonaccorso
va escriure:
> Control: retitle -1 mailutils: local privilege escalation in maidag
> utility (fixed in 3.8) (CVE-2019-18862)

Given this does not affect Debian by default, should my upload go
through debian-security or just s-p-u?

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mailutils/commit/c1683e71301e3c7454ab407334a211759148d47e

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach 

Bug#918417: Status update

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi,

I'm looking at this bug because it's menacing my package goiardi.

The removal count expires today; in the meanwhile goiardi 0.11.9 has
been uploaded a few days ago, and does no longer require -x-exp-dev to
build.

The other two source packages requiring -x-exp-dev to build are
kubernetes and cadvisor, which are not in testing.

I have tried to build the newest snapshot of golang-golang-x-dev but it
seems to fail in the same way as the current one.

I'll upload the resulting package anyway.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  -- Debian developer  https://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.netjo...@debian.org  https://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at https://oskuro.net/

Bug#920423: sogo: Exception thrown on "rich" email view after 4.0.5 upgrade (from 3.2.6)

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Onur,

El dl. 11 de 02 de 2019 a les 18:31 +0300, en/na Onur Tolga Sehitoglu
va escriure:
> I just posted the following on the SOGO bugtracker issue page.
> Patched fixed the problem for me:
> 
> I figured out the problem. The shouldAskReceipt function in
> UIxMailView.m
> sends a nil email parameter to NGMailAddressParser which calls
> [NSString stringWithString] with this parameter. Prior versions of
> gnustep
> tolerated this but not 1.26.

Thanks for spending some time on this and providing a fix! The patch
looks good, and I have uploaded a new SOGo revision that includes it.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  -- Debian developer  https://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.netjo...@debian.org  https://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at https://oskuro.net/

Bug#920423: sogo: Exception thrown on "rich" email view after 4.0.5 upgrade (from 3.2.6)

[Jordi Mallach]

El dj. 31 de 01 de 2019 a les 20:06 +, en/na Matthew Hall va
escriure:
> No problem!
> 
> It seems to actually be a known issue(?) with SOGo upstream, I’ve
> managed to open a bug report on there own tracker:
> 
> https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=4659
> 
> Looks like at least one other punter is having the same issue, which
> I guess makes it reproducible!
> 
> Presumably the Debian package will be rebuilt from their sources once
> they’ve patched it?

Yes, once there's a patch we would include it in our version ASAP.

If you're monitoring the issue, feel free to ping us here if you see a
fix has landed.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  -- Debian developer  https://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.netjo...@debian.org  https://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at https://oskuro.net/

Bug#920423: sogo: Exception thrown on "rich" email view after 4.0.5 upgrade (from 3.2.6)

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Matthew, apologies for the late reply,

El dv. 25 de 01 de 2019 a les 10:15 +, en/na Matthew Hall va
escriure:
> Package: sogo
> Version: 4.0.5-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> I’ve just upgraded (and due to reasons entirely my fault, I’ve
> realised I have no downgrade path… backup fail) from 3.2.6 (I believe
> it was) to 4.0.5.
> 
> It’s a Debian box, using the “official Debian sogo packages” - I’m
> now running on Debian Buster (due for release later this year).
> 
> Everything is working a charm - upgrading the database appears to
> have worked perfectly - all except the “/view” URL used by the AJAX
> UI for retrieving a “rich” email from a folder...
> (So by extension, I simply cannot view emails in the SOGo webmail
> client.)

Interesting. It works for me using an internal backport to stretch.

Have you tried downgrading to 4.0.4? 
https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20181227T030651Z/pool/main/s/sogo/sogo_4.0.4-2_amd64.deb
and 
https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20181227T030651Z/pool/main/s/sogo/sogo-common_4.0.4-2_all.deb

Let me know if this version works,
Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  -- Debian developer  https://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.netjo...@debian.org  https://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at https://oskuro.net/

Bug#914524: Forwarded upstream

[Jordi Mallach]

I have forwarded this upstream, here:

https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=4625

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#858269: Fails to build, test try things not allowed as non-root

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: docker.io
Version: 1.13.0~ds1-3
Followup-For: Bug #858269

Hi Tim,

I've extended the patches so they fix the testsuite errors.

Attached are the new two patches for debian/patches. With them, docker.io
builds with a non-priviledged user.

Jordi


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages docker.io depends on:
ii  adduser  3.115
ii  containerd   0.2.3~git20161117.78.03e5862~ds1-2+b1
ii  golang-libnetwork0.8.0~dev.2+git20161130.568.fd27f22-4+b1
ii  init-system-helpers  1.48
ii  iptables 1.6.0+snapshot20161117-6
ii  libapparmor1 2.11.0-3
ii  libc62.24-10
ii  libdevmapper1.02.1   2:1.02.137-2
ii  libsqlite3-0 3.16.2-3
ii  libsystemd0  232-23
ii  lsb-base 9.20161125
ii  runc 1.0.0~rc2+git20161109.131.5137186-2+b1

Versions of packages docker.io recommends:
ii  ca-certificates  20161130
ii  cgroupfs-mount   1.4
ii  git  1:2.11.0-2
ii  xz-utils 5.2.2-1.2+b1

Versions of packages docker.io suggests:
pn  aufs-tools   
ii  btrfs-progs  4.9.1-1
ii  debootstrap  1.0.90
pn  docker-doc   
pn  rinse
pn  zfs-fuse | zfsutils  

-- no debconf information
Index: docker.io-1.13.0~ds1/profiles/seccomp/seccomp.go
===
--- docker.io-1.13.0~ds1.orig/profiles/seccomp/seccomp.go
+++ docker.io-1.13.0~ds1/profiles/seccomp/seccomp.go
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ import (
 
 // GetDefaultProfile returns the default seccomp profile.
 func GetDefaultProfile(rs *specs.Spec) (*specs.Seccomp, error) {
-   return setupSeccomp(DefaultProfile(), rs)
+   return setupSeccomp(DefaultProfile(rs), rs)
 }
 
 // LoadProfile takes a file path and decodes the seccomp profile.
Description: allow skipping "privileged" tests with "-test.short"
Author: Tianon Gravi 
Forwarded: no

Index: docker.io-1.13.0~ds1/daemon/daemon_test.go
===
--- docker.io-1.13.0~ds1.orig/daemon/daemon_test.go
+++ docker.io-1.13.0~ds1/daemon/daemon_test.go
@@ -158,6 +158,10 @@ func TestValidContainerNames(t *testing.
 }
 
 func TestContainerInitDNS(t *testing.T) {
+   if testing.Short() {
+   t.Skip("Skipping privileged test in short mode")
+   }
+
tmp, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "docker-container-test-")
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
Index: docker.io-1.13.0~ds1/daemon/graphdriver/aufs/aufs_test.go
===
--- docker.io-1.13.0~ds1.orig/daemon/graphdriver/aufs/aufs_test.go
+++ docker.io-1.13.0~ds1/daemon/graphdriver/aufs/aufs_test.go
@@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ func init() {
 }
 
 func testInit(dir string, t testing.TB) graphdriver.Driver {
+   if testing.Short() {
+   t.Skip("Skipping privileged test in short mode")
+   }
+
d, err := Init(dir, nil, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
if err == graphdriver.ErrNotSupported {
Index: docker.io-1.13.0~ds1/daemon/graphdriver/devmapper/devmapper_test.go
===
--- docker.io-1.13.0~ds1.orig/daemon/graphdriver/devmapper/devmapper_test.go
+++ docker.io-1.13.0~ds1/daemon/graphdriver/devmapper/devmapper_test.go
@@ -11,50 +11,70 @@ import (
"github.com/docker/docker/daemon/graphdriver/graphtest"
 )
 
-func init() {
+func shortSkip(t *testing.T) {
+   if testing.Short() {
+   t.Skip("Skipping privileged test in short mode")
+   }
+}
+
+// This avoids creating a new driver for each test if all tests are run
+// Make sure to put new tests between TestDevmapperSetup and 
TestDevmapperTeardown
+func TestDevmapperSetup(t *testing.T) {
+   shortSkip(t)
+
// Reduce the size the the base fs and loopback for the tests
defaultDataLoopbackSize = 300 * 1024 * 1024
defaultMetaDataLoopbackSize = 200 * 1024 * 1024
defaultBaseFsSize = 300 * 1024 * 1024
defaultUdevSyncOverride = true
if err := graphtest.InitLoopbacks(); err != nil {
-   panic(err)
+   t.Fatal(err)
}
-}
 
-// This avoids creating a new driver for each test if all tests are run
-// Make sure to put new tests between TestDevmapperSetup and 
TestDevmapperTeardown
-func TestDevmapperSetup(t *testing.T) {
graphtest.GetDriver(t, "devicemapper")
 }
 
 func TestDevmapperCreateEmpty(t *testing.T) {
+   shortSkip(t)
+
graphtest.DriverTestCreateEmpty(t, "devicemapper")
 }

Bug#858268: swarmkit: FTBFS due to not strict enough deps on golang-gogoprotobuf

[Jordi Mallach]

Source: swarmkit
Severity: serious

Hello,

swarmkit fails to build on stretch, with golang-gogoprotobuf 0.3.

It does build against 0.3+git20170120.144.265e960d-1 from sid so I suggest
bumping the Build-Dep to at least 0.3+git20170120.144.265e960d-1~ to make
backports easier.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Bug#858267: golang-github-docker-libnetwork: Build-Deps not strict enough

[Jordi Mallach]

Source: golang-github-docker-libnetwork
Severity: serious

Hello,

I was trying to build this on a stretch chroot and found it failed due
to it not requiring a new enough golang-github-vishvananda-netlink.

The commit that adds the messing methood is
https://github.com/vishvananda/netlink/commit/17ea11b5a11c5614597c65a671105e8ee58c4d04

So I suggest making the dep (>= 0.0~git2016.0) or (>= 
0.0~git20170117.0.ebdfb74-1)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Bug#858266: containerd: Assumes an amd64 build

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: containerd
Version: 0.2.3~git20161117.78.03e5862~ds1-1
Severity: serious

debian/rules contains:

  (cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/github.com/docker/containerd && \

which is totally not going to work for any of the architectures
except for amd64.

I suggest you define DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE with the output of
dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE and use that instead.

I haven't tested that at all though.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages containerd depends on:
ii  libc6  2.24-9
ii  runc   1.0.0~rc2+git20161109.131.5137186-2

containerd recommends no packages.

containerd suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Bug#844804: Cannot reproduce

[Jordi Mallach]

severity 844804 important
tags 844804 + unreproducible
thanks

Hi Lucas,

I'm taking the liberty to lower the severity of this bug, as I can't reproduce
on a current sid pbuilder chroot.

I am thinking this might have been caused by the openssl mess, etc.

libsnmp-dev is definitely installable here, and my build succeeds:
dpkg-deb: building package 'zabbix-server-pgsql' in 
'../zabbix-server-pgsql_3.0.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb'.

If you could revisit this bug and close if you think it was a transient
uninstallability problem, please go ahead.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#837824: Fix uploaded to delayed/5

[Jordi Mallach]

tag 837824 + pending

Hi,

I've just uploaded a fixed package to delayed/5, and committed the changes
to git. Feel free to revert if you see a problem with this.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#825483: Lowering severity

[Jordi Mallach]

severity 825483 important
thanks

ftp-master has removed the ppc64el binaries by request, as it's better
to let mame transition to unstable and away from non-free.

Upstream is aware of this build failure, and porter help would be welcome.

Thanks,

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#781524: fcgiwrap: socket is not created and service is not up, but it works after a reboot

[Jordi Mallach]

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
 On a qemu virtual machine with minimal packages installed I do this:
 
 apt-get install fcgiwrap
 ls -l /run/fcgiwrap.socket
 ls: cannot access /run/fcgiwrap.socket: No such file or directory
 
 service fcgiwrap restart
 ls -l /run/fcgiwrap.socket
 ls: cannot access /run/fcgiwrap.socket: No such file or directory
 
 If I reboot:
 
 ls -l /run/fcgiwrap.socket
 srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 mar 30 14:56 /run/fcgiwrap.socket
 
 but surely we will not tell our users in the release notes that they
 have to reboot fot things to work as expected, so I'm setting
 serious here in the hope that a fix for this is accepted in jessie.

Is this under systemd or sysvinit?

 However, if for whatever reason there is not an easy fix for this,
 then please feel free to downgrade severity, I don't want this package
 to be removed from jessie.
 
 Ok, after a little bit more of testing, I found that this works just
 after installing the package:
 
 service fcgiwrap start
 
 but then one might wonder:
 
 1. If the service is started after a reboot, why it is not started
 after installing it for the first time, as every sane package usually
 does?
 
 2. If service fcgiwrap restart does not work, why an error message
 is not shown? (even a message just saying sorry, restart not
 supported would be orders of magnitude better than not saying
 anything).

This should be supported. But let's try to find out what codepath is being
called, depending on your init system (reportbug would have given us that
info!)

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#767115: libfreemarker-java: Declares a parent pom not packaged in Debian

[Jordi Mallach]

Source: libfreemarker-java
Severity: serious

Hi,

By request of Emmanuel, I'm filing this serious bug afainst libfreemarker.

I'm trying to build kurento-module-creator, which builds ok in Launchpad PPA,
but fails on Debian. Apparently, it declares a dep on a non-packaged pom
(http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/sonatype/oss/oss-parent/7/oss-parent-7.pom ?)
as seen in this build log:

dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on 
/usr/src/packages/SOURCES/kurento-module-creator_3.0.6-trusty.dsc
dpkg-source: info: extracting kurento-module-creator in 
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6
dpkg-source: info: unpacking kurento-module-creator_3.0.6-trusty.tar.gz
-
- building kurento-module-creator_3.0.6-trusty.dsc (user abuild)
-
-
Reading package lists...
dpkg-buildpackage: source package kurento-module-creator
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 3.0.6-trustybs1
dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution trusty
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by abuild abuild@buildd
 dpkg-source --before-build kurento-module-creator-3.0.6
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture armhf
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
test -x debian/rules
mkdir -p .
mh_lspoms --non-interactive --offline -pkurento-module-creator --force
Analysing pom.xml...
The list of POM files is now in debian/kurento-module-creator.poms
/usr/share/maven-debian-helper/copy-repo.sh 
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6/debian
mh_patchpoms -pkurento-module-creator --debian-build --keep-pom-version 
--maven-repo=/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6/debian/maven-repo
  --build-no-docs --ignore-rules=debian/maven.ignoreRules 
--clean-ignore-rules=debian/maven.cleanIgnoreRules
touch debian/stamp-poms-patched
cd .  /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -noverify -cp 
/usr/share/maven2/boot/classworlds.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/lib/tools.jar  
-Dclassworlds.conf=/etc/maven2/m2-debian.conf org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher 
-s/etc/maven2/settings-debian.xml 
-Dmaven.repo.local=/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6/debian/maven-repo
  clean
[INFO]
NOTE: Maven is executing in offline mode. Any artifacts not already in your 
local
repository will be inaccessible.

[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building kurento-module-creator
[INFO]task-segment: [clean]
[INFO] 
[INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
[INFO] 
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 2 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Oct 28 12:23:10 UTC 2014
[INFO] Final Memory: 4M/15M
[INFO] 
rm -f -r /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6/debian/maven-repo 
debian/stamp-maven-build
rm -f debian/maven.rules
rm -f debian/*.substvars
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules unpatch-poms
make[1]: Entering directory 
'/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6'
mh_unpatchpoms -pkurento-module-creator
rm -f -f debian/stamp-poms-patched
make[1]: Leaving directory 
'/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6'
dh_clean
mh_unpatchpoms -pkurento-module-creator
rm -f -f debian/stamp-poms-patched
mh_clean
 debian/rules build
test -x debian/rules
mkdir -p .
mh_lspoms --non-interactive --offline -pkurento-module-creator --force
Analysing pom.xml...
The list of POM files is now in debian/kurento-module-creator.poms
/usr/share/maven-debian-helper/copy-repo.sh 
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6/debian
mh_patchpoms -pkurento-module-creator --debian-build --keep-pom-version 
--maven-repo=/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6/debian/maven-repo
  --build-no-docs
touch debian/stamp-poms-patched
# before-build target may be used to unpatch the pom files, so we need to check 
if
# patching the pom files is needed here, normally not
if [ ! -f pom.xml.save ]; then \
  /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules patch-poms; \
fi
cd .  /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -noverify -cp 
/usr/share/maven2/boot/classworlds.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/lib/tools.jar  
-Dclassworlds.conf=/etc/maven2/m2-debian-nodocs.conf 
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher -s/etc/maven2/settings-debian.xml 
-Dmaven.repo.local=/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kurento-module-creator-3.0.6/debian/maven-repo
  package
[INFO]
NOTE: Maven is executing in offline mode. Any artifacts not already in your 
local
repository will be inaccessible.

[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building kurento-module-creator
[INFO]

Bug#746799: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#746799: alsa-base: Depends: kmod but it is not going to be installed

[Jordi Mallach]

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:58:27AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
 However this doesn't solve the problem if the user just removes
 alsa-base without purging it, before the dummy package gets there.
 Couldn't kmod do some clean-up, possibly with user confirmation via
 debconf? (Not sure about the policy in this specific case...)

I'm working on the dummy alsa-base to do cleanups via maintscripts.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#746436: evolution-data-server: Unable to read any messages

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Paul,

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:16:44AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
 Package: evolution-data-server
 Version: 3.12.0-1
 Severity: grave
 Tags: upstream
 Justification: renders package unusable
 Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728976
 Control: found -1 3.12.1-1
 
 Dear Debian folks,
 
 
 upgrading from Evolution Data Server 3.8.5 to 3.12.x it is impossible to
 read messages. They are not shown.
 
 Even building Evolution Data Server from the upstream branch
 `evolution-data-server-3-12` with the commit below does not help.
 
 commit 4615a98c7be1e3f8d23aa8a1c4f43b9d1fb62712
 Author: Milan Crha mc...@redhat.com
 Date:   Fri Apr 25 08:33:48 2014 +0200
 
 Remove unused imapx_unmark_folder_subscribed()
 
 There are more issues like this reported in the GNOME Bugzilla, so spare
 Jessie/testing users from the regular Evolution upgrade pain until
 upstream fixes these issues.

Thanks for the report. I wonder if you've tried with both e-d-s _and_
evolution from unstable, ie 3.12.1. There's a ton of bugfixes in there.

It's interesting we've only got one bug report like this in Debian, so
let's see if we can track it down fast and let eds migrate.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#720060: patch fixes the issue

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Steve,

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:16:56AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
 I was incorrect in my last message when I said that
 mu_authenticate_system() is not called.  It is called.
 
 The patch I provided completely fixes my problem.

Sorry for the late reply, and many thanks for bug report, analysis and
patch!

I've added the patch to the SVN repository, and hopefully will upload soon.

I'll take care of forwarding this patch upstream, too.

Again, many thanks!

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#710144: sl-modem-daemon: Depends on non-existant lib32asound2

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: sl-modem-daemon
Version: 2.9.11~20110321-8
Severity: serious

Hi,

sl-modem-daemon depends on lib32asound2, which is no longer available
in unstable. This dependency probably needs to be replaced by an upgrade
path to a Multi-Arch environment, so amd64 users just use the i386 binary.

Have a look at how other packages in your situation (wine, etc.) have dealt
with this.

Jordi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.8-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#685281: denial of service via many headers

[Jordi Mallach]

On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:42:57AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
 A Denial of Service attack has been reported against tinyproxy:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tinyproxy/+bug/1036985
 https://banu.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110#c2
 
 Can you please see to it that this gets addressed in unstable
 (and by extension wheezy)?
 
 Please use CVE-2012-3505 to refer to this issue.

Will try to get something done ASAP.

Should I do something about stable too? The codebase should be really
similar.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#678484: still broken

[Jordi Mallach]

-gtk-3-jni 
44 packages upgraded, 51 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 220 MB/221 MB of archives. After unpacking 45.0 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libmailutils4 : Conflicts: libmailutils2 but 1:2.2+dfsg1-6+b1 is to be 
installed.
 mailutils-common : Breaks: libmailutils2 ( 1:2.3) but 1:2.2+dfsg1-6+b1 is to 
be installed.
 evolution-data-server : Breaks: libebook-1.2-12 ( 3.4) but 3.2.2-3 is 
installed.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

 Remove the following packages:
1) libebook-1.2-12 
2) libedata-book-1.2-11
3) libmailutils2   



Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  aptitude-common{a} aspectj{a} comerr-dev{a} cryptsetup-bin{a} 
krb5-multidev{a} libaspectj-java{a} libcdio-cdda1{a}
libcdio-paranoia1{a} 
  libcdio13{a} libcommons-dbcp-java{a} libcommons-pool-java{a} 
libeasymock-java{a} libfelix-bundlerepository-java{a} 
  libfelix-gogo-command-java{a} libfelix-gogo-runtime-java{a} 
libfelix-gogo-shell-java{a} libgcrypt11-dev{a} libgdbm-dev{a} 
  libgeronimo-jpa-2.0-spec-java{a} libgeronimo-osgi-support-java{a} 
libgnutls-dev{a} libgnutls-openssl27{a} libgnutlsxx27{a} 
  libgpg-error-dev{a} libgsasl7-dev{a} libidn11-dev{a} libjetty8-java{a} 
libkadm5clnt-mit8{a} libkadm5srv-mit8{a} libkdb5-6{a} 
  libkrb5-dev{a} liblapack3{a} libldap2-dev{a} libmailutils4{a} 
libmusicbrainz5-0{a} libmysqlclient18{a} libntlm0-dev{a} 
  libosgi-compendium-java{a} libosgi-core-java{a} libosgi-foundation-ee-java{a} 
libp11-kit-dev{a} libpam0g-dev{a} libpst4{a} 
  librhythmbox-core6{a} libserf1{a} libservlet3.0-java{a} libtasn1-3-dev{a} 
libtomcat7-java{a} mailutils-common{a} shotwell-common{a} 
  zlib1g-dev{a} 
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libebook-1.2-12{a} libedata-book-1.2-11{a} libmailutils2{a} 
libmusicbrainz3-6{u} 
The following packages will be upgraded:
  aptitude cryptsetup eclipse eclipse-jdt eclipse-pde eclipse-platform 
eclipse-platform-data eclipse-rcp evolution evolution-common 
  evolution-data-server evolution-data-server-common evolution-plugins 
gir1.2-rb-3.0 gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly gvfs gvfs-backends 
  gvfs-daemons gvfs-libs libarpack2 libcamel-1.2-33 libequinox-osgi-java 
libevolution libgtkhtml-4.0-0 libgtkhtml-4.0-common 
  libgtkhtml-editor-4.0-0 liblapack3gf libmailutils-dev libparpack2 libsvn-perl 
libsvn1 libswt-cairo-gtk-3-jni libswt-gtk-3-java 
  libswt-gtk-3-jni libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni mailutils-guile rhythmbox 
rhythmbox-data rhythmbox-plugin-cdrecorder rhythmbox-plugins 
  shotwell sound-juicer subversion 
The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed:
  apt-xapian-index aptitude-doc-cs aptitude-doc-en aptitude-doc-es 
aptitude-doc-fi aptitude-doc-fr aptitude-doc-it aptitude-doc-ja 
  libfelix-osgi-obr-java libfelix-shell-java libfelix-utils-java 
libgeronimo-jta-1.1-spec-java libkxml2-java libswt-glx-gtk-3-jni 
  libswt-gnome-gtk-3-jni 
43 packages upgraded, 51 newly installed, 4 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 219 MB/220 MB of archives. After unpacking 41.1 MB will be used.

Is mailutils on hold, or something like this?

Maybe there was a transient error and your mirror still had no arch-dependant 
binaries of -3?

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#678484: mailutils and maildir-utils: error when trying to install together

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi!

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 03:55:27PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
 It seems that your latest upload of mailutils has introduced
 the command
   /usr/bin/mu
 and the respective man page. But maybe it was there since long and
 nobody detected the conflict.

No, it's quite new: it was available in a SVN version for quite some long
time, and in experiemntal for about a week.

 Unfortunately the maildir-utils package ships the mu binary since
 some time, it is a tool for indexing and searching maildir format
 mboxes.
 
 How do resolve this problem?

I just forwarded this upstream. I see two exits:

- the obvious conflict between the two packages: sad but acceptable
- GNU Mailutils upstream renames the MU binary

Any other idea?

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#678484: mailutils and maildir-utils: error when trying to install together

[Jordi Mallach]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:07:47AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
 I just forwarded this upstream. I see two exits:
 
 - the obvious conflict between the two packages: sad but acceptable
 - GNU Mailutils upstream renames the MU binary

Upstream isn't interested in renaming the program. For now, I'm uploading
a package that adds a conflicts against yours. We both have a low userbase
and don't think this will be problematic for many people, if at all.

Please tell me if you have any comment about this.

I considered renaming my binary, but I really don't want to deviate that
much from upstream.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#678484: mailutils and maildir-utils: error when trying to install together

[Jordi Mallach]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:38:56PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 If both mu programs don't have the same functionality then Conflicts is
 not an acceptable solution.  See the 'node' mess, and policy 10.1.

I see. I guess I'm renaming it on my end, the other mu has been around for
years.

Thanks for the feedback.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#673679: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#673679: alsa-base: rmdir: failed to remove `/etc/apm/suspend.d': No such file or directory

[Jordi Mallach]

Hey Josh,

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:43:24PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
 Any status on this bug?  Current unstable still only has 1.0.25+2,
 uninstallable due to this bug.

I'm in the middle of exams, so NMUs are very welcome. Else, expect an
update next week.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#673679: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#673679: alsa-base: rmdir: failed to remove `/etc/apm/suspend.d': No such file or directory

[Jordi Mallach]

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 07:19:18PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
 Your package can only be installed once, subsequent attempts fail:
 
 ,
 | # LANG=C aptitude reinstall alsa-base
 | The following packages will be REINSTALLED:
 |   alsa-base 
 | 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 3 
 not upgraded.
 | Need to get 0 B/59.9 kB of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
 | (Reading database ... 206531 files and directories currently installed.)
 | Preparing to replace alsa-base 1.0.25+2 (using 
 .../alsa-base_1.0.25+2_all.deb) ...
 | rmdir: failed to remove `/etc/apm/suspend.d': No such file or directory
 | rmdir: failed to remove `/etc/apm/resume.d': No such file or directory
 | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/alsa-base_1.0.25+2_all.deb 
 (--unpack):
 |  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
 | Errors were encountered while processing:
 |  /var/cache/apt/archives/alsa-base_1.0.25+2_all.deb
 | E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
 | A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:

Sigh, how many times can this go wrong?

Thanks for the bug report, will fix ASAP.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#672577: wine: File conflict with old package wine-gecko-1.0.0

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: wine-bin
Version: 1.2.3-0.1
Severity: serious

Hi,


S'està desempaquetant el reemplaçament de wine-bin…
dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar 
/var/cache/apt/archives/wine-bin_1.2.3-0.1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 s'està intentant sobreescriure 
«/usr/share/wine/gecko/wine_gecko-1.0.0-x86.cab», que també està en el paquet 
wine-gecko-1.0.0 1.0.0+dfsg-1

Or, translated: trying to overwrite, etc, etc.

I'm not sure where this wine-gecko thing came from, I guess it's an
ancient stray package in my system, but a Breaks or Conflicts would be
good.

Thanks,
Jordi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8@valencia, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8@valencia (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages wine depends on:
ii  libwine-alsa 1.2.3-0.1
ii  libwine-cms  1.2.3-0.1
ii  libwine-gl   1.2.3-0.1
ii  libwine-gphoto2  1.2.3-0.1
ii  libwine-ldap 1.2.3-0.1
ii  libwine-openal   1.2.3-0.1
ii  libwine-print1.2.3-0.1
ii  libwine-sane 1.2.3-0.1
ii  wine-bin 1.2.3-0.1

Versions of packages wine recommends:
ii  fonts-liberation [ttf-liberation]  1.07.2-2
ii  ttf-liberation 1.07.2-2

Versions of packages wine suggests:
pn  avscan | klamav | clamav   none
pn  binfmt-support 2.0.8
pn  ttf-mscorefonts-installer  none
pn  winbindnone
pn  wine-doc   none

Versions of packages libwine depends on:
ii  ia32-libs   20120102
ii  lib32z1 1:1.2.7.dfsg-1
ii  libc6-i386  2.13-32

Versions of packages libwine suggests:
pn  wine-doc  none

-- no debconf information



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#622897: Can we please upload a new webalizer?

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Julien and Felipe,

It's now a full year since I offered to test, review and sponsor Julien's
package update. I have been using it during all this time, and have had no
problem at all. Actually, it has fixed so many problems wrt the old
version, it's not fair nobody else is taking advance of Julien's effort.

Can we please upload the package now? The perfect is the enemy of the
good, and this bug report really shows.

The current package was already outdated in squeeze and probably in lenny
and the last time it was in a releasable state in wheezy was too long ago.

Please, someone upload whatever Julien has today, and lets fix the
remaining issues in other uploads.

Again, I'm available as a sponsor, reviewer and tester.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#635342: CVE-2011-2193: Multiple buffer overflows

[Jordi Mallach]

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:43:22PM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
 There is a long email thread on upstream's mailing list and I am not sure
 if we can update to 2.5.
   http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/2011-January/003342.html

Sure, but
http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/2011-January/003369.html

I still don't see how the license change is legal at all. With the 1.1
license, I think it's good enough for Debian, as AFAICT we can comply with
both licenses, and wether Adaptive Computing was allowed to change the
licence is arguably something Debian doesn't need to worry about, unless
the original copyright owner sues AC or whatever.

This is getting offtopic for @security.d.o though. :)

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#635342: CVE-2011-2193: Multiple buffer overflows

[Jordi Mallach]

Hey,

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 07:42:54PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
  Even so, Munge appears to require distributing auth tokens, keys or
  whatever before a munge-enabled cluster is operational, so this is quite a
  change for a DSA, not to mention the version bump if we went that route.
 
 I agree, that's too much impact. I've marked it as no-dsa in the security
 tracker.
  
 This likely has no impact in reality anyway; anyone running a computation
 cluster will keep it w/o untrusted users anyway.

Agreed.

 Will you be updating to a MUNGE-enabled version of Torque before Wheezy?

We should upgrade to the latest 2.5 release, however there's a note from
Dominique stating there was a license change in 2.5.x so I'm not sure we
we're at. The only significant change I can see in the licence is:

-8-8--8-
This license will be governed by the laws of Utah, without reference to
its choice of law rules. 
-8-8--8-

which swaps Virginia with Utah. If the licence was ok for main in the
past, it should be ok for main now.

If we are allowed to, I think we should move to Torque 2.5, and see what
we want to do about 3.0. If/when we do that, I'll add CVE refs to the
changelog.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#635857: tinyproxy: fails to start. tinyproxy: Could not open file /var/log/tinyproxy.log: Permission denied.

[Jordi Mallach]

severity 635857 normal
thanks

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 02:16:41AM -0400, Jason A. Spiro wrote:
 tinyproxy 1.6.3-2 from Debian 5 lenny worked fine.  I just upgraded
 to Debian 6 squeeze and the new tinyproxy 1.8.2-1squeeze1.  Now
 tinyproxy fails to start with a series of error messages including
 tinyproxy: Could not open file /var/log/tinyproxy.log: Permission
 denied.  Downgrading to 1.6.3-2 makes the problem go away.

When you upgraded from 1.6.x, you must have got a dpkg conffile upgrade
prompt, and you probably refused to merge your configuration changes to
the new configuration proposal.

This left you with a configuration referencing /var/run/tinyproxy.pid and
/var/log/tinyproxy.log for PidFile and LogFile. This, mixed to tinyproxy
now dropping privileges much earlier in the startup sequence (a good
thing), caused your problem.

Compare your /etc/tinyproxy/tinyproxy.conf with
/etc/tinyproxy/tinyproxy.conf.dpkg-new to see this and other differences.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#627503: Downgrading/untagging

[Jordi Mallach]

severity 627503 important
tag 627503 - security
retitle 627503 Validate Port directive value
thanks

A small summary of what's going on with this:

- The Debian security team does not consider this to be a security issue
  as tinyproxy's configuration file is under the control of the admin, and
  an exploit needs changing the Port value to something that can trigger a
  buffer overflow.

- This was fixed anyway in a Debian patch in 1.8.2-2, which is currently
  in testing and unstable.

- 1.8.3-1, recently uploaded to unstable, is the first upstream release to
  officially include this fix.

- We're uploading 1.8.2squeeze2 to stable so the fix appears in the next
  point release anyway, via the normal t-p-u path.

Thanks,
Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#627152: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#627152: alsa-source: problem exists with i868 also (linux-headers-2.6.38-2-686)

[Jordi Mallach]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
 Can that soon be now?

I'm extremely busy until the 22nd, but I can try my best. If that doesn't
work out, I'll have a look at the end of the month.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#649694: linux-sound-base: snd-ca0106 fails to record audio with 'sb_live!_24_bit'

[Jordi Mallach]

reassign 649694 linux-2.6
severity 649694 normal
thanks

Hi,

Can you try upgrading your kernel to 3.2 to see if that helps? Did this
stop working when upgrading from squeeze to wheezy, or after upgrading
your kernel package while tracking Debian testing?

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#635342: CVE-2011-2193: Multiple buffer overflows

[Jordi Mallach]

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 07:30:10PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
 CVE_2011_2193 was fixed in DSA 2329.
 
 The second issue, CVE-2011-2907, is still unfixed in stable.

My read of the Bugzilla log was that Redhat didn't actually fix the
issue, but provided a workaround, by enabling Munge support.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713090#c6

As far as I can tell, our torque version doesn't support munge, and they
did an upgrade to 2.5.7 to provide munge support.

Even so, Munge appears to require distributing auth tokens, keys or
whatever before a munge-enabled cluster is operational, so this is quite a
change for a DSA, not to mention the version bump if we went that route.

As far as I can tell, there is no real fix, and upstream doesn't seem
interested, as they seem to be promoting munge, or claiming you should
have a firewall.

http://www.clusterresources.com/pipermail/torqueusers/2011-August/013195.html

The idea behind this is that a Torque cluster is assumed to be under
control, including all submitting hosts. If someone gains root access to
one of the hosts in the cluster, not only they can submit hosts to the
torque server, but do other fun things as well, unrelated to torque. Yes,
I think this is way a bit too much of assumption, but it seems this is
what settled the issue upstream.

Sorry, I actually had looked this up two months ago or so, but had dropped
the ball before mailing the Security team.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#614610: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#614610: echo mia crashes

[Jordi Mallach]

On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 02:48:35PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
  - for someone to summarize the current status of packaging ALSA
firmware and what remains to be done in that direction

I talked to Ben about this a few days ago, and we concluded:

 - We want alsa-firmware in Debian, as part of firmware-linux
 - Before this happens in Debian, we want to see if ALSA upstream would
   agree to move alsa-firmware to the firmware-linux official
   tree/releases. As Ben is one of the maintainers, we already know they
   would accept it, so we just need ALSA's say on this.
 - Once it is, Ben would import it and eventually it would appear in
   Debian.

So, in short, I agreed with Ben that I'd contact tiwai and perex to see
what they think, and then act accordingly to the outcome.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#644690: Please update to 0.15

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi,

Most of the bits and pieces that make up GNOME 3 are ready to enter
testing, and it's time to kick out those rdeps that break with it.

I see upstream has released 0.15 which appears to be compatible with
nautilus 3.2; please update to this version ASAP. In the meanwhile,
rabbitvcs will be removed from testing to ease transition of GNOME 3.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#638122: RM: service-discovery-applet; dead upstream, blocks GNOME3 transition

[Jordi Mallach]

reassign 638122 ftp.debian.org
retitle 638122 RM: service-discovery-applet; dead upstream, blocks GNOME3 
transition

service-discover-applet hasn't been ported to GNOME3, and is currently
unusable with the new interfaces.

None of the past Debian maintainers seem to be interested in porting the
applet themselves, so we've agreed to remove it from Debian entirely.

Thanks,
Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#646000: RM: jalali-calendar: dead upstream; blocks GNOME 3 transition

[Jordi Mallach]

reassign 646000 ftp.debian.org
retitle 646000 RM: jalali-calendar: dead upstream; blocks GNOME 3 transition
thanks

Please remove jalali-calendar from the Debian archive:

The several code hosting services that have jalali-calendar code are all
outdated and idle for several years, including Gna, which seems to be the
last active one.

It does not seem this package is getting any updates to make it usable
again on GNOME3, so it should be removed entirely.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#645992: RM: topshelf; dead upstream, blocks GNOME 3 transition

[Jordi Mallach]

reassign 645992 ftp.debian.org
retitle 645992 RM: topshelf; dead upstream, blocks GNOME 3 transition
thanks

Please remove topshelf from the archive. It appears to be dead upstream
(last commit early 2008) and no efforts have been found to migrate to the
new GNOME Panel interface. This package is now useless and can be removed
from Debian entirely.

Thanks,
Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#638127: RM: ows -- dead upstream; blocks GNOME3 transition

[Jordi Mallach]

reassign 638127 ftp.debian.org
retitle 638127 RM: ows -- dead upstream; blocks GNOME3 transition
thanks

Please remove ows from the archive: it has not had any relevant upstream
activity since 2007, has low popcon and is blocking the GNOME3 transition.
It certainly doesn't look like this will be ported to GNOME3 any time
soon.

The Debian maintainer/upstream author was contacted but got no reply.

Thanks,
Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#638076: libpanel-applet transition: please upload a fix to unstable

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi,

The GNOME 3 transition has started and it's time to upload fixes for the
panel applets to unstable. If a fix isn't available or doable, please disable
applet support; otherwise, your package will we removed from testing in
order to complete the transition.

Bugs concerning this migration are now considered release critical and
will be updated to serious severity following this email.

Thanks,
Jordi, on behalf of the GNOME team.
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#645225: NMU uploaded

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi,

As the big GNOME upload was faster than I expected, I took the liberty to
upload this to the archive. Sorry for the lack of time to react on your
end.

Attached is the final patch I applied; I used the opportunity to add a
missing dependency on evo-data-server, as fixed by the Ubuntu packages.

Thanks!
Jordi

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
diff -Nuar gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/changelog gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/changelog
--- gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/changelog	2011-06-25 14:48:15.0 +0200
+++ gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/changelog	2011-10-14 21:49:31.725251438 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+gnome-phone-manager (0.67-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload, for the GNOME 3 transition.
+  * New upstream release, based on GTK+3 (closes: #645225).
+  * Bump Build-Deps for GTK+3, as per configure.in.
+  * Don't Build-Depend or include quilt, it's unneeded with
+source version 3.0 (quilt).
+  * Watch for .xz tarballs, as the GNOME project has switched to only
+distributing software in that format.
+  * Add missing dependency on evolution-data-server (lp: #225306).
+
+ -- Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org  Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:22:26 +0200
+
 gnome-phone-manager (0.66-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nuar gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/control gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/control
--- gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/control	2011-04-12 06:57:50.0 +0200
+++ gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/control	2011-10-14 21:39:12.0 +0200
@@ -9,16 +9,13 @@
  libebook1.2-dev,
  libglib2.0-dev (= 2.25.0),
  libgnokii-dev (= 0.6.28),
- libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.18),
- libcanberra-gtk-dev,
+ libgtk-3-dev (= 3.0),
+ libcanberra-gtk3-dev,
  libgconf2-dev,
- libgnome-bluetooth-dev (= 2.27.6),
- libglade2-dev,
+ libgnome-bluetooth-dev (= 3.0),
  libdbus-glib-1-dev,
  gnome-icon-theme (= 2.19.1),
- libgtkspell-dev,
- libtelepathy-glib-dev,
- quilt
+ libtelepathy-glib-dev
 Homepage: http://live.gnome.org/PhoneManager
 Vcs-SVN: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-bluetooth/packages/gnome-phone-manager/trunk
 Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-bluetooth/packages/gnome-phone-manager/trunk
@@ -27,7 +24,7 @@
 
 Package: gnome-phone-manager
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, hicolor-icon-theme, bluetooth
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, evolution-data-server, hicolor-icon-theme, bluetooth
 Recommends: gnome-bluetooth
 Description: control aspects of your mobile phone from your GNOME 2 desktop
  Phone Manager is a program created to allow you to control aspects of your
diff -Nuar gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/rules gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/rules
--- gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/rules	2011-06-25 14:47:58.0 +0200
+++ gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/rules	2011-10-13 22:29:53.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
   
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnome.mk
 
 DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --enable-telepathy
diff -Nuar gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/watch gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/watch
--- gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/watch	2010-11-08 00:59:58.0 +0100
+++ gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/watch	2011-10-13 22:30:21.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version=3
-http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gnome-phone-manager/([\d\.]+)/gnome-phone-manager-(.*)\.tar\.gz \
+http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gnome-phone-manager/([\d\.]+)/gnome-phone-manager-(.*)\.tar\.xz \
  debian  uupdate


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#637311: Nautilus transition started; please upload to unstable

[Jordi Mallach]

severity 644980 serious
severity 637312 serious
severity 637320 serious
severity 637329 serious
severity 637314 serious
severity 637318 serious
severity 637327 serious
severity 637321 serious
severity 644694 serious
severity 637323 serious
severity 637316 serious
severity 637324 serious
severity 644697 serious
severity 637309 serious
severity 644695 serious
severity 644979 serious
severity 637317 serious
severity 637311 serious
severity 644691 serious
severity 644692 serious
severity 644689 serious
severity 644696 serious
severity 637319 serious
severity 637328 serious
severity 637313 serious
severity 637325 serious
severity 644693 serious
severity 637310 serious
severity 637330 serious
severity 637322 serious
severity 644690 serious
severity 637315 serious
thanks

Hi!

The GNOME 3 transition has started, and fixing all nautilus extensions is
now release critical.

Please upload a GTK+3 version of your package to unstable as soon as
possible, or ask for help in debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org if any
problem arises.

Thanks!

Jordi, on behalf of the GNOME team.
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#645225: Patches for 0.67

[Jordi Mallach]

tag 635225 + patch
thanks

Hi,

I have prepared an upload of the new version, which will be uploaded soon
to unstable, as the GNOME 3 transition has just started, and packages are
flowing into unstable.

Find attached the diff of the package I'd upload in a few days, in an
attempt to have a smooth transition.

Thanks,

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
diff -Nuar gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/changelog gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/changelog
--- gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/changelog	2011-06-25 14:48:15.0 +0200
+++ gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/changelog	2011-10-13 22:31:08.890461447 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+gnome-phone-manager (0.67-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload, for the GNOME 3 transition.
+  * New upstream release, based on GTK+3.
+  * Bump Build-Deps for GTK+3, as per configure.in.
+  * Don't Build-Depend or include quilt, it's unneeded with
+source version 3.0 (quilt).
+  * Watch for .xz tarballs, as the GNOME project has switched to only
+distributing software in that format.
+
+ -- Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org  Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:22:26 +0200
+
 gnome-phone-manager (0.66-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nuar gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/control gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/control
--- gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/control	2011-04-12 06:57:50.0 +0200
+++ gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/control	2011-10-13 22:29:27.466461034 +0200
@@ -9,16 +9,13 @@
  libebook1.2-dev,
  libglib2.0-dev (= 2.25.0),
  libgnokii-dev (= 0.6.28),
- libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.18),
- libcanberra-gtk-dev,
+ libgtk-3-dev (= 3.0),
+ libcanberra-gtk3-dev,
  libgconf2-dev,
- libgnome-bluetooth-dev (= 2.27.6),
- libglade2-dev,
+ libgnome-bluetooth-dev (= 3.0),
  libdbus-glib-1-dev,
  gnome-icon-theme (= 2.19.1),
- libgtkspell-dev,
- libtelepathy-glib-dev,
- quilt
+ libtelepathy-glib-dev
 Homepage: http://live.gnome.org/PhoneManager
 Vcs-SVN: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-bluetooth/packages/gnome-phone-manager/trunk
 Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-bluetooth/packages/gnome-phone-manager/trunk
diff -Nuar gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/rules gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/rules
--- gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/rules	2011-06-25 14:47:58.0 +0200
+++ gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/rules	2011-10-13 22:29:53.878461448 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
   
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnome.mk
 
 DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --enable-telepathy
diff -Nuar gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/watch gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/watch
--- gnome-phone-manager-0.66/debian/watch	2010-11-08 00:59:58.0 +0100
+++ gnome-phone-manager-0.67/debian/watch	2011-10-13 22:30:21.158461397 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version=3
-http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gnome-phone-manager/([\d\.]+)/gnome-phone-manager-(.*)\.tar\.gz \
+http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gnome-phone-manager/([\d\.]+)/gnome-phone-manager-(.*)\.tar\.xz \
  debian  uupdate


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#630297: NMU uploaded

[Jordi Mallach]

tags 630297 + pending
thanks

Hi, 

I have uploaded a NMU fixing this bug as part of the libnotify 0.7
transition effort. Attached are the changes used to fix it.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
diff -Nuar pomodoro-applet-0.4.1-1/debian/changelog pomodoro-applet-0.4.1/debian/changelog
--- pomodoro-applet-0.4.1-1/debian/changelog	2010-11-02 21:22:22.0 +0100
+++ pomodoro-applet-0.4.1/debian/changelog	2011-08-05 15:58:25.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+pomodoro-applet (0.4.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload, for the libnotify 0.7 transition.
+  * Apply upstream patch to support the new libnotify API (closes: #630297).
+  * Require libnotify-dev (= 0.7).
+
+ -- Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org  Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:51:16 +0200
+
 pomodoro-applet (0.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nuar pomodoro-applet-0.4.1-1/debian/control pomodoro-applet-0.4.1/debian/control
--- pomodoro-applet-0.4.1-1/debian/control	2010-10-13 21:46:39.0 +0200
+++ pomodoro-applet-0.4.1/debian/control	2011-08-05 15:59:44.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: gnome
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: John Stumpo st...@jstump.com
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), autotools-dev, libpanel-applet2-dev, libnotify-dev, libgstreamer0.10-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), autotools-dev, libpanel-applet2-dev, libnotify-dev (= 0.7), libgstreamer0.10-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 
 Package: pomodoro-applet
diff -Nuar pomodoro-applet-0.4.1-1/debian/patches/libnotify07.patch pomodoro-applet-0.4.1/debian/patches/libnotify07.patch
--- pomodoro-applet-0.4.1-1/debian/patches/libnotify07.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ pomodoro-applet-0.4.1/debian/patches/libnotify07.patch	2011-08-05 15:53:40.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+From: John Stumpo st...@jstump.com
+Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:26:05 + (-0400)
+Subject: Update call to notify_notification_new for libnotify 0.7.
+X-Git-Tag: v0.5~1
+X-Git-Url: http://git.jstump.com/gitweb/pomodoro-applet.git?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e89271b730849f44c1a6c38f317400a37f8c6187
+
+Update call to notify_notification_new for libnotify 0.7.
+---
+
+diff --git a/pomodoro.c b/pomodoro.c
+index dfd03d7..1a304b1 100644
+--- a/pomodoro.c
 b/pomodoro.c
+@@ -59,7 +59,12 @@ static void pom_set_timer(struct pom_state* state, int new_state, int seconds)
+ static void pom_notify(struct pom_state* state, const gchar* summary, const gchar* body, gboolean sound)
+ {
+   /* Show the libnotify notification. */
+-  NotifyNotification* note = notify_notification_new(summary, body, NULL, NULL);
++  NotifyNotification* note;
++#if !defined(NOTIFY_VERSION_MAJOR) || (NOTIFY_VERSION_MAJOR == 0  NOTIFY_VERSION_MINOR  7)
++  note = notify_notification_new(summary, body, NULL, NULL);
++#else
++  note = notify_notification_new(summary, body, NULL);
++#endif
+   notify_notification_show(note, NULL);
+   g_object_unref(note);
+ 
diff -Nuar pomodoro-applet-0.4.1-1/debian/patches/series pomodoro-applet-0.4.1/debian/patches/series
--- pomodoro-applet-0.4.1-1/debian/patches/series	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ pomodoro-applet-0.4.1/debian/patches/series	2011-08-05 16:03:36.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+libnotify07.patch

Bug#635342: CVE-2011-2193: Multiple buffer overflows

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi!

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 09:10:09PM -0400, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
 Thanks for finding the security issue. We are working on a solution.
 
 Jordi, can you help out with the squeeze fix and upload? I think you
 have done those things before, right?

I have prepared a package in SVN which is ready for upload. Before doing
so, Moritz, can you look at this additional patch I found in the 2.4 SVN
branch?

svn diff -r4780:4781 svn://svn.clusterresources.com/torque/branches/2.4-fixes

What do you think, should we add that too? There are no additional CVEs
for Torque, apparently so maybe this can't be used as an attack vector?

Packages (without this second patch) are in my homedir in people.d.o, and
signed. I'm going offline until monday morning, so if you check them out
and see everything looks good, feel free to move them to the queue.

Thanks,
Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#614369: vsftpd: Does not create ftp user if a username starting with 'ftp' already exists

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: vsftpd
Version: 2.3.2-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

Configurando vsftpd (2.3.2-3) ...
vsftpd user (ftp) already exists, doing nothing.
chown: grupo inválido: «root:ftp»
dpkg: error al procesar vsftpd (--configure):
 el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de 
salida de error 1

This is due to the postinst check not checking for the existance of the
'ftp' user, but any user starting with 'ftp':

if ! getent passwd | grep -q ^${_USERNAME}
then
adduser --system --home ${_DIRECTORY} --no-create-home 
--quiet --gecos 'ftp daemon' --group ${_USERNAME}
elif
...

Using gettent passwd ftp should probably be more useful. Also, this
check would assume the group already exists, which isn't the  case if you
migrate from eg. proftpd.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8@valencia, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8@valencia (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#598257: force merge grub bugs

[Jordi Mallach]

forcemerge 593652 598257
thanks

This bug seems fixed in -8, uploaded a few days ago.

If not, please unmerge and reopen.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#600578: grub-common: grub-mkrelpath does not return any output when processing non-root ZFS filesystems

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: grub-common
Version: 1.98+20100804-4
Severity: serious
Tags: fixed-upstream

grub-mkrelpath detects and correctly processes root ZFS volumes. However,
it does not return anything when processing any other ZFS volumes.

To make it more obvious, these are the results of tests on a system setup
with a ZFS volume for /, and an additional ZFS volume for /boot (needed as
GRUB does not support ZFS with volume arrays).

dkfbf1:~# grub-mkrelpath /
//@
dkfbf1:~# grub-mkrelpath /usr  
//@/usr
dkfbf1:~# grub-mkrelpath /boot

dkfbf1:~#

This breaks grub.cfg generation on this kind of GNU/kFreeBSD setup, and is
already fixed upstream in commits 2881..2883:

diff -r 2881..2883 http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/trunk/grub/


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: lang=ca_es.ut...@valencia, lc_ctype=ca_es.ut...@valencia (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages grub-common depends on:
ii  base-files  5.9  Debian base system miscellaneous f
ii  dpkg1.15.8.5 Debian package management system
ii  gettext-base0.18.1.1-3   GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  install-info4.13a.dfsg.1-5   Manage installed documentation in 
ii  libc6   2.11.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libdevmapper1.02.1  2:1.02.48-3  The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use
ii  libfreetype62.4.2-1  FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages grub-common recommends:
ii  os-prober 1.39   utility to detect other OSes on a 

Versions of packages grub-common suggests:
pn  grub-emu  none (no description available)
pn  multiboot-doc none (no description available)
pn  xorriso   none (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#599387: moodle: Security update does not configure, missing dependency on www-config

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: moodle
Version: 1.8.13-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

An attempt to upgrade moodle in our server resulted in the following:


moodle:~# apt-get upgrade
S'està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet 
S'està construint l'arbre de dependències   
S'està llegint la informació de l'estat... Fet
0 actualitzats, 0 nous a instal·lar, 0 a suprimir i 0 no actualitzats.
1 no instal·lats o suprimits completament.
Després d'aquesta operació s'empraran 0B d'espai en disc addicional.
Voleu continuar [S/n]? 
S'està configurant moodle (1.8.13-1) ...
*** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
 the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
 script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
 and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
 old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!

 Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
-
The selected web server doesn't seem to be installed
You should select a web server which is installed or
configure your web server manually
-
/var/lib/dpkg/info/moodle.postinst: line 167:
/usr/share/wwwconfig-common/restart.sh: El fitxer o directori no existeix
dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar moodle (--configure):
 el subprocés post-installation script retornà el codi d'eixida d'error 1
S'han trobat errors en processar:
 moodle
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


This looked very strange, it's been a long time a Debian security upgrade
breaks like this on me. changelog.Debian revealed there's been a big
version jump in the version offered by stable-security and s-p-u; from
1.8.2 to 1.8.13; the dependencies of the former do list wwwconfig-common
as a dependecy, while the new package doesn't.

Manually installing wwwconfig-common did help the update finish.

Have there been any packaging changes not documented in the changelog?

Jordi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: lang=ca_es.ut...@valencia, lc_ctype=ca_es.ut...@valencia (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#599387: [moodle-packaging] Bug#599387: moodle: Security update does not configure, missing dependency on www-config

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 01:32:34PM +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote:
 The big jump in a version was necessary to fix several security
 vulnerabilities that has piled up over the last few years. I will
 create a new version of the package that will depend on www-config
 asap - hopefully later today.

Note I changed the bug's title to reflect it's wwwconfig-common, not
www-config. :)

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#598578: zabbix: Insufficient build-dependency on autotools-dev

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: zabbix
Version: 1.8.3-1
Severity: serious

zabbix declares a build-dep on autotools-dev, but uses
dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig and dh_autotools-dev_restoreconfig, which
appeared in autotools-dev 20100122.1. Please change the build-depends to
require at least this version.

Thanks,
Jordi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: lang=ca_es.ut...@valencia, lc_ctype=ca_es.ut...@valencia (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#573220: Sponsor

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Benoit,

Three months have passed since this week. If the only problem is getting
a sponsor for the package, I'm sure at least a dozen Debian developers are
monitoring this bug report. Just post an URL to a source package or a VCS
repo where we can fetch this and I'm sure this upload will happen really
quick.

Jordi

(the VCS listed in the current package does not have any commits after the
current Debian version).
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#585889: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#585889: Bug#585889: fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi Petter,

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:54:45PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
  udev added to ld10k1's Depends:
 Note that this will make the package fail to install on architectures
 without udev and systems where the admin do not want to use udev.  I
 do not know the ld10k1 package, but if it is able to work also without
 udev installed, it might be better to change the init.d script header
 and add
 
   # Should-Start: udev
 
 to give the init.d script an optional dependency on udev, instead of a
 hard dependency.

Sounds sensible, we can change this for the next upload.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#572514: Listen directive doesn't work as expected

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: tinyproxy
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: fixed-upstream

Tinyproxy 1.8.0 can in some cases bind only to the loopback interface
instead of 0.0.0.0 wildcard, as happened with 1.6.3. This is a serious
enough regression to make it not safe for testing transition, so I'm filing
bug to block it.

The bug is already fixed upstream and will be released as 1.8.1 next week.

Jordi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: lang=ca_es.ut...@valencia, lc_ctype=ca_es.ut...@valencia (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#552964: Help requested

[Jordi Mallach]

tags 552964 + help
thanks

I've posted a debug run of the testsuite to the upstream mailing list
bug-mailutils:

 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2009-11/msg1.html

Unfortunately Sergey doesn't appear to be available at the moment, and we
have no DejaGNU expertise. We would really need someone who can point what's
going on in the logs.

If anyone thinks disabling the testsuite is tempting, the failing test is
actually a check for a vulnerability that triggered DSA-732, so no thanks. :)

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#545432: powerpc bug

[Jordi Mallach]

This has been happening since at least mid/late july (I first encountered
this when I was in Debconf, probably the 24th of July).

Note this also affects sparc:

http://robertmh.wordpress.com/2009/07/18/grub-on-sparc/#comment-383

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#529940: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#529940: Bug#529940: Re: Bug#529940: lib32asound2: symbol versioningg

[Jordi Mallach]

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:03:23PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
 So alsa-lib with the -DUSE_VERSIONED_SYMBOLS patch workes?

I think so. I'll upload tomorrow after inspecting the 32bit lib.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#529940: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#529940: Bug#529940: Bug#529940: Re: Bug#529940: lib32asound2: symbol versioningg

[Jordi Mallach]

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:39:04AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
  So alsa-lib with the -DUSE_VERSIONED_SYMBOLS patch workes?
 I think so. I'll upload tomorrow after inspecting the 32bit lib.

Due to the urgency, I haven't been able to build on amd64 (I have
no 64bit hardware at home), and have reverted the Architecture change
for -doc to Arch: all. I couldn't figure out why that was changed,
and lintian didn't tell me anything helpful. Can you explain, Elimar?

We can add it back on the next upload.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#497640: What's the status of this?

[Jordi Mallach]

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:53:03AM +1000, Peter Howard wrote:
 I have it packaged, and it does a clean install fine.  However it's
 failing to upgrade from previous versions.  Once that's resolved it will
 go into the repo.

If I can help in any way, please say. I'd be willing to get your sources
posted somehere where it's uploaded against our tiredness and drive,


-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#497640: What's the status of this?

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi, I've been waiting for packages of the new version for a while, and wonder
whgat's missing of if we can do something to help getting the packages done.

Thanks,
Jordi

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#518231: linux-image-2.6.28-1-powerpc: Fails to configure due to a debconf error

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: linux-image-2.6.28-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.28-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi,

I tried installing linux-image-2.6.28-1-powerpc from experimental but it
failed to configure:

run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/mkvmlinuz exited with return code 20

I added set -x to this script, which revealed:

+ _db_cmd GET mkvmlinuz/bootloaders
+ IFS=  printf %s\n GET mkvmlinuz/bootloaders
+ IFS= read -r _db_internal_line
+ RET=20 Unsupported command update-initramfs: (full line was 
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.28-1-powerpc) received from 
confmodule.
+ return 20

My system has the not so usual feature of using GRUB2 instead of yaboot for
booting, and I suspect I'm probably the only one doing this on this on
powerpc.

yaboot was installed, and the mkvmlinux/bootloaders debconf variable was
set to yaboot, it turned out.

This bug seems a reincarnation of this Ubuntu bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kernel-package/+bug/54346

The following patch to postinst fixed it for me, although I'm not sure its
the right fix.

--- /tmp/linux-image-2.6.28-1-powerpc.postinst  2009-03-04 23:04:09.0 
+0100
+++ /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.28-1-powerpc.postinst2009-03-04 
22:48:38.0 +0100
@@ -983,7 +983,7 @@
 my $initrd_path = $realimageloc . initrd.img-$version;
 my $ret = system($ramdisk_cmd  .
  ($mkimage ? -m '$mkimage'  : ) .
- -c -t -k $version);
+ -c -t -k $version 2);
 if ($ret) {
   warn $ramdisk_cmd failed to create initrd image.\n;
 } else {

-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.28-1-powerpc (Debian 2.6.28-1) (m...@debian.org) (gcc version 
4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-4) ) #1 Mon Feb 23 23:26:08 UTC 2009

** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinux-2.6.28-1-powerpc root=/dev/hda3 ro quiet

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[7.880625] usb usb4: Product: EHCI Host Controller
[7.880628] usb usb4: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.28-1-powerpc ehci_hcd
[7.880631] usb usb4: SerialNumber: 0001:10:1b.2
[7.887940] ide-gd driver 1.18
[7.887983] hda: max request size: 512KiB
[7.906049] firewire_ohci 0002:24:0e.0: enabling device ( - 0002)
[7.937116] hda: 156301488 sectors (80026 MB), CHS=16383/255/63
[7.937191] hda: cache flushes supported
[7.937300]  hda: [mac] hda1 hda2 hda3 hda4 hda5 hda6
[7.976185] firewire_ohci: Added fw-ohci device 0002:24:0e.0, OHCI version 
1.10
[7.976839] sungem.c:v0.98 8/24/03 David S. Miller (da...@redhat.com)
[8.044551] PHY ID: 1410cc1, addr: 0
[8.045269] eth0: Sun GEM (PCI) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:0d:93:3b:80:c4
[8.045273] eth0: Found Marvell 88E PHY
[8.464592] udev: renamed network interface eth0 to lan
[8.476343] firewire_core: created device fw0: GUID 000d93fffe3b80c4, S800
[9.179749] kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
[9.179772] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[   11.350275] udevd version 125 started
[   11.897085] Linux agpgart interface v0.103
[   11.930156] agpgart-uninorth :00:0b.0: Apple UniNorth 2 chipset
[   11.930280] agpgart-uninorth :00:0b.0: configuring for size idx: 8
[   11.930369] agpgart-uninorth :00:0b.0: AGP aperture is 32M @ 0x0
[   11.990716] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: CardBus bridge found [:]
[   11.990735] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: Enabling burst memory read 
transactions
[   11.990741] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: Using CSCINT to route CSC interrupts 
to PCI
[   11.990744] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: Routing CardBus interrupts to PCI
[   11.990750] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: TI: mfunc 0x1002, devctl 0x60
[   12.092216] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: ISA IRQ mask 0x, PCI irq 53
[   12.09] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: Socket status: 3007
[   12.092233] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge I/O 
window: 0x0 - 0x7f
[   12.092239] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory 
window: 0xf300 - 0xf3ff
[   12.092244] yenta_cardbus 0001:10:13.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory 
window: 0x8000 - 0xafff
[   12.352270] cfg80211: Using static regulatory domain info
[   12.352277] cfg80211: Regulatory domain: US
[   12.352280]  (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, 
max_eirp)
[   12.352284]  (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2700 mBm)
[   12.352288]  (517 KHz - 519 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[   12.352292]  (519 KHz - 521 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[   12.352296]  (521 KHz - 523 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[   12.352300]  (523 KHz - 533 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
[   12.352304]  (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (600 mBi, 3000 mBm)
[   12.352309] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: US
[   13.697952] b43-phy0: Broadcom 4306 WLAN found
[   13.767791] phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid'
[   13.933498] snd-aoa-fabric-layout: found 

Bug#497913: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#497913: Bug#497913: alsa-source: fails to build

[Jordi Mallach]

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:21:39PM +0200, Ferry Toth wrote:
 Thanks for fixing the bug.
 
 Is there is any chance of solving the problem behind the bug: Maestro3
 driver is not available after upgrading to linux 2.6.26?
 
 Will there be a package in non-free?

I don't think we have the manpower to create a package for this driver, however
if anyone is willing to do the work, we can accomodate it in the project's
repositories.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#483918: [Pkg-alsa-devel] alsa-driver 1.0.16

[Jordi Mallach]

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 09:20:34PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
 I didn't recognized any missconf or similar at
 CM8738, EMU10k1, ES1371, snd_aoa_codec_tas and intel-amd64.

Ok. Let's try this...

 If 1.0.17.dfsg, do we really need a lenny branch? Let's distribute
 as usual ;)

No, we wouldn't require one.

  Depending on what you think about these questions, I'll do something or the
  other.
 I'll extend the prepared 1.0.17.dfsg with some more fixes tommorow.
 Let us upload alsa-driver 1.0.17 to sid then.

Ok. I won't be available for upload until Sunday.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#483918: [Pkg-alsa-devel] alsa-driver 1.0.16

[Jordi Mallach]

Elimar,

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 08:01:03PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
 at the moment I am very busy and the bug management is very inertial
 from my side. Could one please point me on how to create a
 alsa-driver_1.0.16.dfsg package in a svn lenny branch.? Or could the
 prepared alsa-driver_1.0.17.dfsg package exist beside the 1.0.16
 libs and tools? Any help from the _team_ would be *very helpful*!

Would you foresee any problem with having alsa-source 1.0.17 and alsa-lib
1.0.16 in lenny? I don't, and in fact I think having 1.0.17 would be better as
it would match the ALSA in 2.6.26 (it would actually compile).

Furthermore, is there any problem with having kernel 2.6.26 (which includes
alsa drivers version 1.0.17) and alsa-lib 1.0.16 in lenny as we have now, or
would it be desirable to have 1.0.17 just to match the kernel version? (I'm
thinking about configuration file missmatches and so on, mostly).

Regarding creating a branch, it should be as easy as a cp of trunk to
branches/lenny using the revision with the last changes to 1.0.16, and I'll be
able to handle that, don't worry.

Sorry for the lack of action, I'm also quite a bit busy and regret that need to
be pinged by you constantly to take action. :/

Depending on what you think about these questions, I'll do something or the
other.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#461998: merging

[Jordi Mallach]

forcemerge 489112 471759 461998
thanks

At this point, I'm now considering disabling the testsuite, as it seems
some change in either the toolchain or dejagnu broke it and I haven't
been able to discover where the problem lies.

This FTBFS is now affecting lenny, where the package built some months
ago.

I know this is lame, but my option right now are either drop mailutils
or not run the testsuite until we get more info. I can try to get a
better fix during the freeze if one is found and push it via t-p-u if
it's worth it.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#489112: mailutils: FTBFS: ERROR: Cannot create /build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1 /imap4d/testsuite/data/spool/INBOX:

[Jordi Mallach]

Hi,

tags 489112 + help
forwarded 489112 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks

On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:28:17AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
 i386.
 
 Relevant part:
  make[4]: Entering directory 
  `/build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/imap4d/testsuite'
  Making a new remote.exp file...
  Making a new site.exp file...
  srcdir=`CDPATH=${ZSH_VERSION+.}:  cd .  pwd`; export srcdir; \
  EXPECT=expect; export EXPECT; \
  runtest=runtest; \
  if /bin/sh -c $runtest --version  /dev/null 21; then \
l='imap4d'; for tool in $l; do \
  $runtest  --tool $tool --srcdir $srcdir ; \
done; \
  else echo WARNING: could not find \`runtest' 12; :;\
  fi
  spawn 
  /build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/imap4d/testsuite/../imap4d
   --show-config-options
 
  VERSION=1.2
 
  USE_LIBPAM
 
  HAVE_LIBLTDL
 
  WITH_GDBM
 
  WITH_GNUTLS
 
  WITH_GSASL
 
  WITH_GSSAPI
 
  WITH_GUILE
 
  WITH_PTHREAD
 
  WITH_READLINE
 
  HAVE_MYSQL
 
  ENABLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS
 
  ENABLE_IMAP
 
  ENABLE_POP
 
  ENABLE_MH
 
  ENABLE_MAILDIR
 
  ENABLE_SMTP
 
  ENABLE_SENDMAIL
 
  ENABLE_NNTP
 
  spawn 
  /build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/testsuite/makespool
   -subst 
  s,@MU_SPOOL_DIR@,/build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/imap4d/testsuite/data/spool,
   
  /build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/testsuite/etc
   
  /build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/imap4d/testsuite/data/etc
 
  Test Run By user on Wed Jul  2 23:12:46 2008
  Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
  
  === imap4d tests ===
  
  Schedule of variations:
  unix
  
  Running target unix
  Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for 
  target.
  Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for 
  target.
  Using 
  /build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/imap4d/testsuite/config/default.exp
   as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
  Running 
  /build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/imap4d/testsuite/imap4d/IDEF0955.exp
   ...
  Running 
  /build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/imap4d/testsuite/imap4d/IDEF0956.exp
   ...
  ERROR: Cannot create 
  /build/user-mailutils_1.2+dfsg1-1-amd64-g60eu0/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1-1/imap4d/testsuite/data/spool/INBOX:
   
  make[4]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1

I'm seeing this very same error with the new upstream release 1.9.91 (in
SVN). As this has been building on i386 previously, it seems something
in the toolchain changed and broke mailutils.

Unfortunately, my dejagnu skills are quite limited and I request help
from someone who might want to have a look at this.

You can get a lot more out from make check if you run

  make check RUNTESTFLAGS=-v -v -v --debug

I recently reported this upstream, but I still got no response
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2008-06/msg2.html

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#483918: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#483918: Bug#483918: alsa-driver - binary only code

[Jordi Mallach]

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:35:28PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
 Wrt to alsa-source, what's the point of the package anyway? This
 might've been useful in Linux 2.4 days, but nowadays all drivers
 should be present in the stock kernel package?

Many people get their newer hardware working thanks to updating their
drivers to the latest ALSA release, while the linux-image drivers remain
silent. It is a package we need to keep.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#459933: Makefile.in.in is not DFSG-free

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: intltool
Version: 0.37.0-1
Severity: serious

The file Makefile.in.in has the following header:

# This file file be copied and used freely without restrictions.  It can
# be used in projects which are not available under the GNU Public License
# but which still want to provide support for the GNU gettext functionality.
# Please note that the actual code is *not* freely available.
#
# - Modified by Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] to use GETTEXT_PACKAGE
#   instead of PACKAGE and to look for po2tbl in ./ not in intl/
#
# - Modified by jacob berkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] to install
#   Makefile.in.in and po2tbl.sed.in for use with glib-gettextize
#
# - Modified by Rodney Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] for use with intltool

Which makes it DFSG non-free. The bug is even worse if you take into
account that this file is part of the bootstrap of many programs in the
GTK+ world, so the problem is quite widespread among GNOME source
packages in Debian.

This file originates from GNU gettext, but has changed quite a bit since
the fork, and it may not be trivial to rediff. The newer gettext do ship
Makefile.in with the following header, which would be OK, though:

# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
# under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License as published
# by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
# any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
# Library General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General Public
# License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301,
# USA.

This bug has been reported upstream.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages intltool depends on:
ii  automake1.9 [automaken]   1.9.6+nogfdl-3 A tool for generating GNU Standard
ii  file  4.21-4 Determines file type using magic
ii  gettext   0.17-2 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  libxml-parser-perl2.34-4.3   Perl module for parsing XML files
ii  patch 2.5.9-4Apply a diff file to an original
ii  perl  5.8.8-12   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

intltool recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#454963: postinst fails

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: typespeed
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious

Hi daf,

On my laptop, I just got this when trying to install the latest version
(a new install, not upgrade).

S'està desempaquetant typespeed (de .../typespeed_0.6.4-1_powerpc.deb) ...
S'està configurant typespeed (0.6.4-1) ...
cd: 50: can't cd to /var/games/typespeed
dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar typespeed (--configure):


The package includes /var/games, but not /var/games/typespeed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages typespeed depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.97-5.6   The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils 5.97-5.6   The GNU file management utilities 
ii  libc6 2.7-4  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libncurses5   5.6+20071124-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand

typespeed recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

Bug#422729: [ppc] recent snapshot doesn't work at all and drops me to OF

[Jordi Mallach]

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:24:00PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
 Do you have any guess about the problem?

grub-probe claimed my drive had a zero-length so that might be the root
of everything?

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/

Bug#422729: [ppc] recent snapshot doesn't work at all and drops me to OF

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: grub2
Version: 1.95+20070505-1
Severity: critical

Hi,

The 1.95+20070505-1 version of grub2 drops me to OF just after starting
the system. I have only been able to boot after booting from CD and
reinstalling an older grub2 (1.95-1, which doesn't give me a menu, but
allows me to boot at least).



-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc

Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages grub2 depends on:
ii  libc6 2.5-5  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  liblzo1   1.08-3 data compression library (old vers
ii  libncurses5   5.5-5  Shared libraries for terminal hand

grub2 recommends no packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#358342: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RC Bug

[Jordi Mallach]

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:31:43PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
 we have an RC bug #358342 related to alsa-modules-i386. Any hints on
 how to close it? We do not maintain this package anymore, do we? It
 would decrease the number of RC-bugs. The target of maximum RC-bugs
 releasing etch is 80 but should be zero;)

As far as I know, we can safely ignore the bug. Kernel 2.4 won't be
maintained in etch, so this source package will go away.

This opens the question wether we want to migrate alsa-modules-i386 to
linux 2.6, and make it multiple archiecture capable.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#387709: [Pkg-freeciv-devel] Bug#387709: Fonts

[Jordi Mallach]

severity 387709 important
quit smoking today

On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:48:13AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
 Miguel, other people have more or less the same fonts installed and
 can't reproduce. Can you strace or gdb it and see if you find
 something else?

Miguel just gave me a clue on IRC: it won't crash with a
ca_ES.ISO-8859-1 locale, but only with UTF-8.

He didn't have transcoded fonts installed, and apparently xaw3d isn't
liking this. The client shouldn't crash, but this is not RC.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#387709: [Pkg-freeciv-devel] Bug#387709: Fonts

[Jordi Mallach]

tags 387709 + unreproducible
thank you

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:37:49PM +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
 The xfonts-* installed/non-installed in my system:

Miguel, other people have more or less the same fonts installed and
can't reproduce. Can you strace or gdb it and see if you find
something else?

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#363147: libxklavier10: Debian patch xorg_xkb_path.patch breaks libxklavier

[Jordi Mallach]

Hey Marcelo,

Wow, this is pretty embarrasing. I didn't have a fully upgraded box at
the time of the upload, so got 4 testers on IRC to check the package for
me. They said it was ok; my half upgraded system seemed ok as well, and
then I went for easter vacation until today.

It's weird nobody else has submitted this before, but thanks for the
analysis and patch.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#321644: Please apply the patch! anyone has time to NMU?

[Jordi Mallach]

On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote:
 Loic, you a time-slot NMU this? I am currently under 120% load, so I probably
 won't have time for it in the near future!

What's the correct patch to apply here? Build with -O instead of -O2, or
to try the bugzilla patch provided by Lionel?

I'll try to trick lool so we prepare a NMU in the next few days.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#338435: status of the ocaml 3.09.0 migration ...

[Jordi Mallach]

Hello!

On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 06:21:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
  syslog-ocaml has been updated in SVN to generate debian/control from
  debian/control.in, so it just needs a sponsored upload.
 Apparently, there's already been an NMU for this issue, without notifying
 the maintainers...

Oh damn, I forgot to send mail to the BTS.

Please excuse me! 

Eric, as I don't have SVN write access, yes, the only thing you need to
do is to merge the changelog. Sorry about the lack of interaction. At
that time I thought this package was the only one holding KDE out from
testing, so it seemed like pretty urgent to get it done, + the package
seemed to be ready for weeks already.

Thanks,
Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#344884: Should be removed from the archive

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: mlgtk
Severity: grave

Hello,

Looking at the ocaml transition, I've come across mlgtk, which seems to
be a bit obsolete: binds gtk1.2 + has no reverse dependencies.

Please, consider reassigning this bug to ftp.master.org, to get the
package removed from Debian.

Jordi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341989: Won't play audio cd

[Jordi Mallach]

reassign 341989 gnome-media
severity 341989 important
thanks

On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 09:27:10AM -0700, Joseph Michael Smidt wrote:
 I installed testing from the new install cd.  I put in an audio cd and
 it immeadiatly says:
 
 The Application gnome-cd has quit unexpectedly.
 
 
 
 It then asks me to run bug-buddy and gives this report:
 
 
 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-cd'
 
 (no debugging symbols found)
 Using host libthread_db library /lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1.
 (no debugging symbols found)
 `system-supplied DSO at 0xe000' has disappeared; keeping its
 symbols.
 (no debugging symbols found)
 (no debugging symbols found)
 ...
 [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
 [New Thread -1224209792 (LWP 8047)]
 (no debugging symbols found)
 (no debugging symbols found)
 ...
 0xb738120e in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
 #0  0xb738120e in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
 #1  0xb7d4eee3 in libgnomeui_module_info_get ()
 from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
 #2  signal handler called
 #3  0xb71ab7a7 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
 #4  0xb71ad04b in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
 #5  0xb72e7ddd in g_logv () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 #6  0xb72e7e0e in g_log () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 #7  0xb72e7e73 in g_assert_warning () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 #8  0x08057c13 in cd_display_get_pango_layout ()
 #9  0x0805866a in gst_cdparanoia_cdrom_get_type ()
 #10 0x08050b1d in gnome_cd_build_track_list_menu ()
 #11 0x0805201b in main ()
Thread 1 (Thread -1224209792 (LWP 8047)):
 #0  0xb738120e in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #1  0xb7d4eee3 in libgnomeui_module_info_get ()
 from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #2  signal handler called
 No symbol table info available.
 #3  0xb71ab7a7 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
 No symbol table info available.
 #4  0xb71ad04b in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
 No symbol table info available.
 #5  0xb72e7ddd in g_logv () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #6  0xb72e7e0e in g_log () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #7  0xb72e7e73 in g_assert_warning () from
 /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #8  0x08057c13 in cd_display_get_pango_layout ()
 No symbol table info available.
 #9  0x0805866a in gst_cdparanoia_cdrom_get_type ()
 No symbol table info available.
#10 0x08050b1d in gnome_cd_build_track_list_menu ()
 No symbol table info available.
 #11 0x0805201b in main ()
 No symbol table info available.
 #0  0xb738120e in __waitpid_nocancel () from
 /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
 
 
 
 
 The bug-buddy gives it a process ID 8047.
 
 Steps to reproduce the crash:
 1. Install Etch from testing install CD
 2. Put in audio cd
 3.

FYI, GNOME 2.12, which will get to testing some day, doesn't rely on
gnome-cd for audio reproduction, so you won't have this problem at all.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#331634: Clean upgrade fails

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: libpt-dev
Severity: serious

S'està desempaquetant el reemplaçament de libpt-dev ...
dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar 
/net/mirror/debian/pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-dev_1.8.7-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 s'està intentant sobreescriure «/usr/lib/libpt.so.1», que també està en el 
paquet libpt-1.8.3c2

Pretty straight forward: it seems a replaces is missing somewhere.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Bug#325142: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#325142: Don't understand, seems like circular issue

[Jordi Mallach]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:20:52AM -0400, Steve Strong wrote:
 udev 0.060 and to some extent greater depends on kernel 2.6.12 or
 greater. Not sure whether something up to .068 fixed this or not.
 
 kernel-source 2.6.11 is unstable and 2.6.8 is testing.

linux-2.6 2.6.12 (source) and linux-image-2.6.12 is in unstable. Watch
out, package names have changed.

 Looking at the udev .068 package in unstable, it looks like there are
 plenty of problems that'll make it quite some time before it is moved to
 testing.
 
 About 585 other packages in testing seem to depend on the testing
 version of udev. This seems to be the only package in testing that
 requires an unstable version of a tool that would break dependencies of
 so many other packages.

This is because it slipped into testing. If we had noticed, we would
have prevented this with a dummy RC bug, but it's late now.

glibc should enter testing, hopefully, in a week or so. We can only wait
for that at this point.

 If nothing, could this be rebuilt for testing with the testing version
 of udev (.056-3)? At least until udev resolves their many issues and
 get's a newer version into testing...

Maybe the easiest is to rebuild current udev in a testing box, and
install the new kernel from unstable (that won't have any dependency
problem).

That, or wait. We're really focused on ALSA 1.0.10, so we'd like to keep
going. When new versions of glibc get stuck, testing suffers in many
ways. This is one of them. :(

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#319632: Syntax error in kernel rules file

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: kernel-package
Version: 9.003
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi,

Compiling the official 2.6.12 Debian release, I found the following
syntax error  that prevents succesful builds on powerpc.

Thanks,
Jordi


--- rules.orig  2005-07-23 18:08:04.0 +0200
+++ rules   2005-07-23 18:10:27.0 +0200
@@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@
 ifeq ($(strip $(NEED_IMAGE_POST_PROCESSING)),YES)
if test grep $(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_TARGET) 
$(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_DIR)/Makefile 21 /dev/null; then \
$(MAKE) INSTALL_MKVMLINUZ=$(INSTALL_MKVMLINUZ_PATH)\
-   ARCH=$(KERNEL_ARCH) -C $(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_DIR) 
$(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_TARGET\
+   ARCH=$(KERNEL_ARCH) -C $(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_DIR) 
$(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_TARGET;\
fi
 endif
 ifneq ($(strip $(image_clean_hook)),)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages kernel-package depends on:
ii  bcc [c-compiler] 0.16.14-1.2 16-bit x86 C compiler
ii  dpkg 1.13.10 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  dpkg-dev 1.13.10 Package building tools for Debian
ii  gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.0.0-2   The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-2.95 [c-compiler]1:2.95.4-22 The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.2 [c-compiler] 1:3.2.3-9   The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.6-7   The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.0 [c-compiler] 4.0.1-2 The GNU C compiler
ii  make 3.80-9  The GNU version of the make util
ii  perl 5.8.7-4 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages kernel-package recommends:
ii  bzip2   1.0.2-7  high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Development Librari

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312406: Think this is related

[Jordi Mallach]

Jim,

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:39:20PM -0400, Jim Wiggs wrote:
 I just discovered this bug report at bugs.debian.org.  Sunday night
 I did an apt-get upgrade; apt-get dist-upgrade on my Sid box.  Gnome
 is now utterly and completely broken.  It starts up, and the gnome-panel
 application begins to crash and restart repeatedly, popping up the App
 has quit unexpectedly window every time.  Clicking the button to notify
 the developers brings up bug-buddy, which then begins crashing and
 restarting as well.  Eventually a ctrl-alt-backspace is required to kill X and
 restart it.  I was hoping this was a temporary problem and would be fixed
 right away, but it's 2 days later, I did another apt-get update, upgrade,
 and dist-upgrade, got a new gnome-core, and it's still broken.  It is not
 related to the previous configuration files.  I created an entirely new test
 user account with an empty home directory, logged in, and got the same
 problem with that account.
 
Sent from my gmail account because I can't get into Evolution now...

Try stopping the HAL daemon, and if that helps, you either:
- need to upgrade to Linux 2.6, or
- need to upgrade to the libc6 in experimental, which will be uploaded
  soon to unstable (we hope)

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#312406: gnome-core does install on my system!

[Jordi Mallach]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:05:59PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
 I very recently upgraded my sid system with apt-get and gnome-core (as
 well as gnome-panel etc.) is upgraded.
 
 Does this mean that the transition is complete or is it still ongoing and
 can there be similar bugs?

No, gnome-core will be upgraded again maybe today, maybe tomorrow, when
the last few packages (just three pending) enter unstable.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature