Bug#677146: python-uno uses file from libreoffice-core in preinst without declaring PreDepends
Package: python-uno Version: 1:3.5.3-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 during an upgrade, the python-uno preinst script calls: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg This file seems to come from the libreoffice-core pacakge. According to the policy: Pre-Depends are also required if the preinst script depends on the named package I found this when helping someone that was having trouble upgrading from squeeze to wheezy and was getting a preinst failure due to this file being missing. stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages python-uno depends on: ii libc6 2.13-32 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.0-10 ii libpython2.7 2.7.3~rc2-2.1 ii libreoffice-core 1:3.5.3-5 ii libstdc++64.7.0-10 ii python2.7.2-10 ii python2.7 2.7.3~rc2-2.1 ii uno-libs3 3.5.3-5 ii ure 3.5.3-5 python-uno recommends no packages. python-uno suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#658341: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:59:53 +0100, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote: In any case a multi-arch enabled dpkg will not miss wheezy.=20 Guillem, Are you really in a position to declare this? The release team as previously said [0] directly to you that they were looking for an upload in Octoboer in order to ensure this release goal was met. Forgive me if I've missed some other discussion about this, but since we are now months beyond this, are we expecting the freeze date to be moved to accomodate? Or has somehting else changed? stew [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2011/10/msg00050.html pgp0PvT0pdIj7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#625050: cannot reproduce
tags 625050 unreproducible thanks I'm unable to reprodue this bug on amd64. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? pgpyxuCTCDifg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#612562: unable to reproduce
Thomas, I'm unable to reproduce this. It also looks like there has been a new version of this package uploaded since your report was filed. Are you still able to reproduce this bug? stew pgpv5RoqsO69c.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#614527: unable to reproduce
I'm unable to reproduce this bug. Is anyone else able to reproduce this bug? stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#637622: dtc-common: places configuration files in /var/lib
Package: dtc-common Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.2 dtc seems to put lots of configuation files in /var/lib/dtc, contrary to policy. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#637501: dtc-common: modifies config files of other packages
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:31:19 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote: The goal of my software is to handle the configuration of the server. If we follow what you are saying, then an administrator would have to spend hours to setup his server manually for a single installation. Do you think that this is manageable? I don't care. This isn't a reason for your package to ignore debian policy. Note also that I've opened discussions about it, and that I'm trying to solve the issue, but the postfix maintainer (for example) didn't even bother to reply. Upstream said that a conf.d folder isn't even possible. What solution do I have here? The solution is to not modify the cofiguration files of other packages, obviously. My package doesn't at all fit with debian policy. My package cannot be made to follow policy isn't a sign that the policy needs to be changed or that the policies should be ignored. It is a sign that the package doesn't belong in debian. stew pgpovFoZiS6NL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#637622:
Thomas Goirand writes: I don't see any configuration file there. seriously? How about named.conf? How about vhosts.conf? root@testdtc:~# source /etc/apache2/envvars root@testdtc:/root# apache2 -S 192.168.122.137:* is a NameVirtualHost default server www.foo.com (/var/lib/dtc/etc/vhosts.conf:40) port 80 namevhost www.foo.com (/var/lib/dtc/etc/vhosts.conf:40) port 443 namevhost dtc.vireo.org (/var/lib/dtc/etc/vhosts.conf:76) port 80 namevhost dtc.vireo.org (/var/lib/dtc/etc/vhosts.conf:112) port 80 namevhost mx.vireo.org (/var/lib/dtc/etc/vhosts.conf:145) port 80 namevhost www.vireo.org (/var/lib/dtc/etc/vhosts.conf:180) Please reread the definition of a configuration file in the policy manual: A file that affects the operation of a program, or provides site- or host-specific information, or otherwise customizes the behavior of a program. I'd say that most of the files in here fit that description.. apache.pid does not, but it belongs in /var/run not /var/lib -stew p.s. please Cc: bug#-submit...@bugs.debian.org when following up to bugs when you solicit a response. pgp4fULYoTIzV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#637618: I don't understand your response.
I don't understand your response. I don't know what chrooted users have to do with this bug. The problem is that you are allowing the dtc user to run any program they wish as root. This means that any apache vulnerability easily becomes a remote root vulnerability. If your intention is to let dtc run any command as root (which I think is a very bad idea), then what is the point of having the dtc user at all? debian typically runs apache as the www-data user which has very few privileges for good reasons. stew p.s. please include bug#-submit...@bugs.debian.org in replies. pgpOwSdZaBuQR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#637618: dtc-common: giving sudo access to chrootuid is giving access to root
Package: dtc-common Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole the install script gives sudo access to the dtc user (the user that is running apache) unrestricted access to chrootuid, which essentially gives root access to the dtc account: root@testdtc:/var/lib/dtc/etc# su - dtc $ whoami dtc $ sudo chrootuid / root /bin/bash root@testdtc:/# whoami root root@testdtc:/# wc -l /etc/shadow 27 /etc/shadow rot@testdtc:/# grep dtc /etc/sudoers Defaults:dtc !set_logname dtc ALL= NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/chrootuid * -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#635084: php-html-common: inaccurate copyright file
Source: php-html-common Version: 1.2.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 debian/copyright refers to the php 2.02 license, but the source code refers to the 3.01 license. The copyright files claims that PHP Group is the copyright holder of this software. Where did that information come from? I don't find that in the upstream source. bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#635085: php-net-ping: please update copyright file
Source: php-net-ping Version: 2.4.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 The source code claims to be copyright by several of the upstream authors, but the source code itself doesn't have these copyright claims anyway. The sourcecode claims to be held by the the PHP Group. Please update debian/copyright. As I assume you know, since you have an override for the lintian error, there are questions about the distributability of code under php 2.x licenses for software which is not part of PHP itself. Since the upstream homepage [1] now seems to claim that this is distributable under the php 3.01 license, lets update debian/copyright to reflect that; stew [1] http://pear.php.net/package/Net_Ping/redirected -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633643: libnatpmp: missing license in copyright file
Source: libnatpmp Version: 20101211-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 Some of the source files carry a MIT like license which is not mentioned in the package copyright file bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633643: libnatpmp: missing license in copyright file
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:43:02 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote: On 07/12/2011 08:43 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote: Source: libnatpmp Version: 20101211-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 Some of the source files carry a MIT like license which is not mentioned in the package copyright file bye, stew Would you mind to be a little bit more specific? compare this text: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS AS IS AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. to this text: * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. * * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR * ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. */ They are quite different. bye, stew pgpQt0vs8z14M.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#633665: tumgreyspf: inaccurate copryight file
Source: tumgreyspf Version: 1.35-7 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 As discussed offline in email with maintainer, this package claims that the software is GPL-2+, when it seems that there is no reason to believe it is anything other than GPL-1 bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633665: tumgreyspf: inaccurate copryight file
anything other than GPL-1 Pardon me, that should read anything other than GPL-2 stew pgp2z1IzSCAwf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#633579: mlmmj: inadequate debian/copyright
Source: mlmmj Version: 1.2.17-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 find_email_adr.c is the source package is a 4-clause BSD license. This license is not documented in any of the copyright files. This needs to be documented, as does the copyright holder of this file. As an asside. Is there a reason not to put the copyright file in debian/copyright as recommended by policy 12.5? bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633580: dtc: inadequate debian/copyright
Source: dtc Version: 0.32.10-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 shared/gfx/xanjaxXHR.js appears to be distributed under the AGPL, but this license isn't mentioned in debian/copyright. (there are also several other copies of this same file) --- debian/copyright contains the following: License: PHP 2.02 This source file is subject to version 2.02 of the PHP license, that is bundled with this package in the file LICENSE, and is available at through the world-wide-web at http://www.php.net/license/2_02.txt. If you did not receive a copy of the PHP license and are unable to obtain it through the world-wide-web, please send a note to lice...@php.net so we can mail you a copy immediately. please include a verbatim copy of the license text. --- shared/gfx/skin/grayboard/css/slide.css is GPL-3, but this license is not mentioned in debian/copyright --- This package contains many minimized .js files for which there is no source. --- There might be other problems. I did not verify the accuracy of the statements in debian/copyright to see which files are under which licenses, but just looked to see if there were licenses which were un-documented. bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file
Source: nova Version: 2011.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 In reviewing this source package, I find several problems with the copyright file: tools/ajaxterm/sarissa* are LGPL, but this is not mentioned in debian/copyright. The rest of ajaxterm is public domain In the smoketests directory, i find: openwrt-x86-ext2.image openwrt-x86-vmlinuz one seems to be a kernel, the other an ext2 image with a kernel and grub. The licenses for these are not mentioned in debian/copyright, and I do not find source for these The license and copyright notice from nova/virt/xenapi/fake.py does not appear contrib/boto_v6 is under a MIT like license that is not mentioned in debian/copyright, nor are its copyright holders bin/nova-manage carries a BSD license which is not mentioned in debian/copyright, nor are its copyright holders bye, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#632142: reassign to emacs23
reassign 632142 emacs23 thanks So the problem here is really that cedet, speedbar, eieio are now implemented by emacs directly. These packages, which are no longer in testing/unstable, should not have targetted emacs23. But since that cat is already out of the bag, the easiest way to avoid this problem in the future would probably be for emacs23 to conflict with these older packages, which will help avoid this problem for people upgrading from squeeze to wheezy. Therefore, I'm reassigning this bug from ecb to emacs23. Thanks, stew pgpF6aFQEPa7X.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#632142: how is cedet installed?
When you say Installing ecb results in a broken package due to several errors regarding missing libs from CEDET (though all such packages are installed) What packages do you mean? CEDET is part of emacs, so there should be no additional packages. Do you have cedet packages installed From stable or oldstable? Perhaps I need to Conflict with those. Do you have a cedet directory in /usr/share/emacs23/site-lisp ? Thanks, stew pgp41e16aDU0F.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#632652: Invalid maintainer email address
Source: gecko-mediaplayer Severity: serious Justification: 3.3 Trying to email the maintainer of this package results in: 550 5.1.1 norse...@ubuntu.com: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table A valid email address is required by policy 3.3. bye, stew pgpMqZv6Iehpe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#632262: Invalid maintainer address
Source: upse Justification: 3.3 Severity: serious The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this domain is unusable: stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled by 5 ifrit.dereferenced.org. stew@tang:~ $ telnet ifrit.dereferenced.org 25 Trying 66.212.21.15... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host A valid email address is required by policy 3.3. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#632263: Invalid maintainer address
Source: qpopper Justification: 3.3 Severity: serious The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this domain is unusable: stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled by 5 ifrit.dereferenced.org. stew@tang:~ $ telnet ifrit.dereferenced.org 25 Trying 66.212.21.15... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host A valid email address is required by policy 3.3. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#632264: Invalid maintainer address
Source: pidgin-mpris Justification: 3.3 Severity: serious The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this domain is unusable: stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled by 5 ifrit.dereferenced.org. stew@tang:~ $ telnet ifrit.dereferenced.org 25 Trying 66.212.21.15... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host A valid email address is required by policy 3.3. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#632265: Invalid maintainer address
Source: pidgin-audacious Justification: 3.3 Severity: serious The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this domain is unusable: stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled by 5 ifrit.dereferenced.org. stew@tang:~ $ telnet ifrit.dereferenced.org 25 Trying 66.212.21.15... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host A valid email address is required by policy 3.3. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#632266: Invalid maintainer address
Source: gtkglext Justification: 3.3 Severity: serious The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this domain is unusable: stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled by 5 ifrit.dereferenced.org. stew@tang:~ $ telnet ifrit.dereferenced.org 25 Trying 66.212.21.15... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host A valid email address is required by policy 3.3. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#630818: Invalid Maintainer
Package: diff-ext Version: 0.3.2-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 The listed maintainer of this package is: Maintainer: Andrea Veri andrea.ver...@gmail.com However, attempting to email this address results in: andrea.ver...@gmail.com SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:andrea.ver...@gmail.com: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [74.125.91.27]: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1 http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6596 e3si7091155qcs.29 bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#630830: xorg: licenses / copyright statements missing from copyright file
Source: xorg Version: 1:7.6+7 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 The debian/copyright for this package is confusing to me. It seems to try to indicate that the copyright holder of this software changes depending on whether this is a debian or a ubuntu package? Can this be clarified? There are licenses in the source code which are not present in debian/copyright. For example, much of the software is GPL-2 licensed, but there is no mention of the GPL-2. There seem to be many copyright holders which should be listed in debian/copyright which are not. xsf-docs/COPYING specifies a copyright holder which MUST be mentioned in debian/copyright in order to comply with the distribution license: © 2010-2011 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#617303: pending hijack
tags 617303 +pending tags 617303 +fixed-upstream tags 548854 +pending thanks Since the maintainer of this package seems MIA, and hasn't responded to any of the bugs in this package in the last few years, I intend to hijack this package. I've sent the maintainer a private email, and I uploaded a fix to delayed/3. http://git.vireo.org/ecb.git has my git repository of the package I've uploaded. stew pgpLzPgyhrMwR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#624457: rkhunter: invalid maintainer address
Package: rkhunter Version: 1.3.8-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 The 1.3.8-3 upload of rkhunter had the Maintainer listed as: Maintainer: Debian Forensics forensic-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org However, emailing that address results in: SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:forensic-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org: host lists.alioth.debian.org [217.196.43.134]: 550 Unrouteable address I believe you wanted forensics-devel instead of forensic-devel. bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624464: rsakeyfind: invalid maintainer address
Package: rsakeyfind Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 the rsakeyfind packages lists this as Maintainer: Debian Forensics forensic-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org however, emailing that address results in: SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:forensic-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org: host lists.alioth.debian.org [217.196.43.134]: 550 Unrouteable address I believe you want forensics-devel instead of forensic-devel. bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624463: unhide.rb: invalid maintainer address
Package: unhide.rb Version: 12-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 the unhide.rb packages lists this as Maintainer: Debian Forensics forensic-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org however, emailing that address results in: SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:forensic-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org: host lists.alioth.debian.org [217.196.43.134]: 550 Unrouteable address I believe you want forensics-devel instead of forensic-devel. bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#617688: b43-fwcutter: debian/copyright lists incorrect license, missing copyright holders
Source: b43-fwcutter Version: 1:013-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 debian/copyright states that this package is GPL, however, it appears to have a 2 clause BSD license, and some code in the public domain. The BSD license requires that copyright holders be listed, and they are not all listed in debian/copyright. thanks, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610257: Bug#610300: dropbox 1.0.17 distribution now complies to copyright complaints
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:37:34 -0800, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: As promised earlier, I've re-packaged Dropbox (based off of Ivan's work) and have tried to address the licensing issues in the packaging. I would be grateful if any Debian developers/maintainers could look through my packaging and help me resolve any further licensing issues that I missed, and perhaps even sponsor my package. Thank you! The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/d/dropbox - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/d/dropbox/dropbox_1.0.20-1.dsc Best regards, ~ Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com As mentioned previously, without a distribution license for this software. we cannot distribute it. Please get upstream to clarify what the terms are for distributing their software. Their README and ACKNOLOEGEMENTS files talk about the licenses for distributing the software they agregate, but not for the software for which they claim copyright. stew pgpnWNtrGNnDh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#610257: Bug#610300: dropbox 1.0.17 distribution now complies to copyright complaints
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:41:47 -0800 (PST), Rian Hunter r...@dropbox.com wrote: hi all we recently released a distribution of dropbox that corrects all the complains listed in these debian bug reports. thanks for the feedback, please let me know if there is anything i can do to make dropbox comply to any more possible copyright requirements. get the new build at: http://forums.dropbox.com/topic.php?id=31870 check the README or ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS files included in the distribution for the required copyright notices. thanks a lot! rian Rian, I don't see a license for dropbox in either the README nor ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. I only see licenses for 3rd party software you agregated. I also don't find source code for this release. Forgive me if I'm overlooking something obvious. thanks, stew pgpDdW8NzwCyq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#610338: psi-plus: contains non-free icons; inadequate copyright file
Source: psi-plus Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1, Policy 12.5 There are many files which are LGPL-2.1+ and many files which are GPL2+, your debian/copyight is not accurate about this saying only that the software is LGPL-2+ and pointing to GPL instead of the LGPL -- I noticed that many of the icons in in the iconsets-psi-plus directory appear to be taken from non-free from various websites. For example, the icondef.xml file inside iconsets-psi-plus/affiliations/vista-halloween-affiliations.jisp reads: Based on Vista halloween Icons by Icons Land. This appears to be http://icons-land.com/vista-style-halloween-pumpkin-emoticons.php The icons look to be identical copies which have been resized. Other icon sets appear to be creative commons licensed, for example, smileys-affiliations/icondef.xml refers to http://p.yusukekamiyamane.com/ as the source, and this site is claiming the icons to be under creative commons which is not mentioned in debian/copyright I worry about the lack of a license for the icons which just claim to have been found on iconfinder.com, as that site constains many non-free icons. iconsets-psi-plus/emoticons/Android.jisp contains icons from the android project which is apache licensed, but this license isn't mentioned in debian/copyright iconsets-psi-plus/emoticons/kolobok* is non-free. There is a copyright file inside the .jisp files which is clearly non-free, and is also not included in debian/copyright At this point I stopped looking at licenses of the iconsets. It is quite clear that many of them are taking from non-free sources. Some might be redistributable and free, but with licenses not mentioned in debian/copyright. --- iris/src/jdns is MIT licensed, but this isn't mentioned in debian/copyright --- src/tools/crash/crash_sigsev* contains a license not mentioned in debian/copyright --- third-party/qca/qca/src/botantools contains multiple licenses not mentioned in debian/copyright --- I stop at this point. I didn't fully audit the source code, but it is clearly needed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610338: only checked testing/unstable
found 610338 0.15~svn3447 thanks Have you seen updated packages? No, I only looked at the version in testint/unstable. Marking the bug accordingly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609691: libtextcat: invalid maintainer address
Source: libtextcat Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 The maintainer of this package is listed as: Daniele Favara no...@dsslive.org, however the dsslive.org domain doesn't accept email. A working email address is required by policy 3.3 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609612: bgoffice-computer-terms: invalid maintainer address
Package: bgoffice-computer-terms Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 debian-addons-bg-maintain...@openfmi.net is not a valid email address, since its only listed MX server does not allow SMTP connections. This was discovered when dinstall tried to send email to the maintainers, which bounced. Subsequent emails from other machines also failed stew -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609613: bgoffice-dict-downloader: invalid maintainer address
Package: bgoffice-dict-downloader Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 the domain name of the Maintainer address does not accept email. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#608969: docbookwiki: modified /etc/sudoers in the maintainer scripts
Package: docbookwiki Version: 0.9.1cvs-11 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.4 the maintainer scripts directly modify /etc/sudoers which is a conffile of the sudo package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages docbookwiki depends on: ii adduser 3.112+nmu2 add and remove users and groups ii apache2-mpm-prefork [http 2.2.16-4 Apache HTTP Server - traditional n pn dblatex none (no description available) ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.37 Debian configuration management sy pn docbook-dsssl none (no description available) pn docbook-utils none (no description available) ii docbook-xml 4.5-7 standard XML documentation system ii docbook-xsl 1.75.2+dfsg-5 stylesheets for processing DocBook ii gawk 1:3.1.7.dfsg-5 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr pn jadetex none (no description available) ii libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.3-6server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii libxml2-utils 2.7.8.dfsg-2 XML utilities ii mysql-server 5.1.49-3 MySQL database server (metapackage ii mysql-server-5.1 [mysql-s 5.1.49-3 MySQL database server binaries and ii openssl 0.9.8o-4 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii php5-cli 5.3.3-6command-line interpreter for the p ii php5-mysql5.3.3-6MySQL module for php5 ii subversion1.6.12dfsg-2 Advanced version control system ii sudo 1.7.4p4-5 Provide limited super user privile pn swish-e none (no description available) pn xmltexnone (no description available) ii xmlto 0.0.23-2 XML-to-any converter ii xsltproc 1.1.26-6 XSLT 1.0 command line processor docbookwiki recommends no packages. docbookwiki suggests no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#608970: docbookwiki: copyright file is incomplete
Package: docbookwiki Version: 0.9.1cvs-15 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 There are many files in the tarball which are GFDL licensed some with and some without invariant sections, this license is not, however, mentioned in the copyright file -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages docbookwiki depends on: ii adduser 3.112+nmu2 add and remove users and groups ii apache2-mpm-prefork [http 2.2.16-4 Apache HTTP Server - traditional n pn dblatex none (no description available) ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.37 Debian configuration management sy pn docbook-dsssl none (no description available) pn docbook-utils none (no description available) ii docbook-xml 4.5-7 standard XML documentation system ii docbook-xsl 1.75.2+dfsg-5 stylesheets for processing DocBook ii gawk 1:3.1.7.dfsg-5 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr pn jadetex none (no description available) ii libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.3-6server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii libxml2-utils 2.7.8.dfsg-2 XML utilities ii mysql-server 5.1.49-3 MySQL database server (metapackage ii mysql-server-5.1 [mysql-s 5.1.49-3 MySQL database server binaries and ii openssl 0.9.8o-4 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii php5-cli 5.3.3-6command-line interpreter for the p ii php5-mysql5.3.3-6MySQL module for php5 ii subversion1.6.12dfsg-2 Advanced version control system ii sudo 1.7.4p4-5 Provide limited super user privile pn swish-e none (no description available) pn xmltexnone (no description available) ii xmlto 0.0.23-2 XML-to-any converter ii xsltproc 1.1.26-6 XSLT 1.0 command line processor docbookwiki recommends no packages. docbookwiki suggests no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#602932: tilecache: Invalid maintainer address
Package: tilecache Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 Trying to send email to the maintainer address of this package caused the following DSN: This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: crschm...@metacarta.com SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:crschm...@metacarta.com: host mail2.metacarta.com [72.9.52.52]: 550 No such user (crschm...@metacarta.com) stew -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#602869: gadmin-openvpn-server: puts logfile in /etc instead of /var/log
Package: gadmin-openvpn-server Version: 0.1.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 The configuration created by gadmin-openvpn-server contains these two lines: log/etc/gadmin-openvpn/server/openvpn-server.log status /etc/gadmin-openvpn/server/openvpn-server-status.log I don't see any way to change this from a client perspective. Logfiles should be placed in /var/log by the FHS. stew -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages gadmin-openvpn-server depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.30.0-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.11.2-6Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcairo21.8.10-6The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.4.2-2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.24.2-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.20.1-1+b1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-01.28.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii menu 2.1.44 generates programs menu for all me ii openvpn 2.1.3-1 virtual private network daemon gadmin-openvpn-server recommends no packages. gadmin-openvpn-server suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#594519: More info
retitle 594519 multiple copyright problems make software non-redistributable as currently packaged thanks I encouraged the submitter to submit this bug after he raised concerns on IRC about some of software in this package. I thought that I'd better take a closer look at this source myself, and I immediately found multiple problems related to the licenses/copyrights of this software package. The problem originally reported by the submitter appears to be a valid concern for upstream. There are also errors in the debian/copyright file which should be addressed by the maintainers with the next upload. I found many instances where copyright holders were missing from debian/copyright when the BSD like license requires that they be present. There are multiple flavors of the BSD license which should be explicitly present in debian/copyright. There were files which were GPL v2 only and files which were GPL v3 only where debian/copyright simply said GPL. I haven't closely enough to determine if software from these two incompatible licenses is beiong used in such a way as to produce non-redistributable binaries. I don't have time to make a full source code audit of this source package immediately, but one needs to be done. Thanks, stew pgpoaqMBgw15L.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#588019: uploaded to DELAYED/3
forcemerge 588019 592077 tags 588019 +pending thanks I've uploaded the patch from Jakub Wilk from 592077 to DELAYED/3. It fixes both bugs. Thanks Jakub. interdiff attached stew pgpX7Wczs0ZUV.pgp Description: PGP signature message/external-body; name*=us-ascii''%2ftmp%2fblueman_1.21-4_blueman_1.21-4.1.interdiff; access-type=local-file: Unrecognized
Bug#542476: downgrade, only a documentation bug
tags 542476 +pending minor 542476 minor thanks Downgrading this bug as it is only a documentation bug. The software works fine when invoked correctly. (require gnuserv-compate) instead of (require gnuserv) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#591505: python-gobject now includes python-gi
According to this: http://live.gnome.org/PyGI PyGI have been merged in PyGObject. Looking at the sources of each, it does appear that the source of pygi is now included in the pygobject source package, making pygi obsolete. stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#592570: python-gobject: copyright file misses distribution license of some files
Package: python-gobject Version: 2.21.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 Version 2.22.4 included the pygi sources. Some files from that source contain distribution licenses not mentioned in debian/copyright. From the pygi source packages's copyright file: Licence: (gi/pygi-foreign-cairo.c, gi/pygi-foreign-cairo.h, gi/pygi-foreign.c, gi/pygi-foreign.h) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the Software), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages python-gobject depends on: ii libc62.11.2-2Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libffi5 3.0.9-2 Foreign Function Interface library ii libgirepository1.0-0 0.6.14-1+b1 Library for handling GObject intro ii libglib2.0-0 2.24.1-1The GLib library of C routines ii python 2.6.5-8 interactive high-level object-orie ii python-support 1.0.9 automated rebuilding support for P Versions of packages python-gobject recommends: ii python-gobject-cairo 2.21.4-1 Python Cairo bindings for the GObj Versions of packages python-gobject suggests: pn python-gobject-dbgnone (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#547960: unneeded dependencies?
tags 547960 patch thanks It seems like neither python-numeric nor python-numpy dependencies are needed here. I looked through the code and find nowhere that it is importing from either package. When I built the package without the dependencies, the game still seemed functional. Are any of the maintainers of this package looking into this bug? thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#537244: unable to reproduce.
I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Are you still able to? If you move your ~/.jppyrc so that a new default config, does the problem still occur? Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#520982: kdelibs: win subdirectory of sourcecode contains undistributable mix of GPL/BSD licenses
reassign 520982 src:kdelibs
thanks
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 07:18:41AM +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 06:27:12 Mike O'Connor wrote:
Package: kdelibs
Version: 3.5.10.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: dfsg #1
in the orig.tar.gz, the win subdirectory contains in.h which is licensed
GPL2+ and pwd.h which is 4-clause BSD. This combination is well known to
not be distributable.
readdir.{h,c} is ASL 1.1 which is also not compatible with the GPL.
Hopefully, since this sourcecode all seems to be related to running KDE on
windows, it could be removed from the upstream tarball.
as the we aren't actually compiling those sources, it is just files in a
directory, all under licenses acceptable for main.
I don't see this being any different as gpl code that *can* link to openssl,
but where we don't in debian distribute the compiled work.
if we were building and distributing the result, I would agree that it is a
issue, but this is not the case here.
Sorry, in this case I was not talking about the kdelibs binary package,
but the kdelibs source package. I'm reassigning it.
This is not just like code that could be compiled against openssl, in
that case, you aren't redistributing an unacceptable mix of licenses.
This is more like if you had GPL code that EMBEDDED a copy of openssl.
stew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#520977: kdelibs: no distribution license for several files
Package: kdelibs
Version: 3.5.10.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: dfsg #1
While working on #520485, I noticed that we are distributing several files for
while we don't seem to have a distribution license.
kio/kssl/kssl/{cert_bundle,certbundle_Makefile} say:
Copyright (c) 1998 Ralf S. Engelschall, All Rights Reserved.
If all rights are reserved and there is no other indication of a license to
distribute, we should not be distributing these files.
cert_extract.c also looks suspicious, and someone needs to verify its origin.
bye,
stew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages kdelibs depends on:
ii kdelibs-data4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-1core shared data for all KDE appli
ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-1+b1 core libraries and binaries for al
kdelibs recommends no packages.
kdelibs suggests no packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520982: kdelibs: win subdirectory of sourcecode contains undistributable mix of GPL/BSD licenses
Package: kdelibs
Version: 3.5.10.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: dfsg #1
in the orig.tar.gz, the win subdirectory contains in.h which is licensed GPL2+
and pwd.h which is 4-clause BSD. This combination is well known to not be
distributable.
readdir.{h,c} is ASL 1.1 which is also not compatible with the GPL.
Hopefully, since this sourcecode all seems to be related to running KDE on
windows, it could be removed from the upstream tarball.
bye,
stew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages kdelibs depends on:
ii kdelibs-data4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-1core shared data for all KDE appli
ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-1+b1 core libraries and binaries for al
kdelibs recommends no packages.
kdelibs suggests no packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520485: kdelibs: inadequate copyright file prevents binary packages from being legally distributable
Package: kdelibs Version: 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 Sune suggested I look at kde packages to see if they have adequate debian/copyright. I'm sorry but they don't seem to. Although I only did a very brief check, I see several problems right away. Below are some of the problems I immediately spotted. I didn't do a full scan of the source for other license problems, but that clearly needs to be done. ./kio/kio/ksambashare.cpp: This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. There are many files like this one that are GPLv2 only. The copyright file refers to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL which is GPL3+ -- kdelibs-3.5.10/kinit/setproctitle* are distributed under a license not mentioned in debian/copyright. -- many files are under a BSD license which explicitly states: Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright but the above copyright isn't duplicated in the binary packages. oThese copyright statemnts must appear in debian/copyright --- several files in kdecore/network contain a license not mentioned in debian/copyright: * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining * a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the * Software), to deal in the Software without restriction, including * without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, * distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to * permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to * the following conditions: * * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included * in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. and the copyright holders are not listed as in the binary packages as is required for distribution. --- bye, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages kdelibs depends on: ii kdelibs-data4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-1core shared data for all KDE appli ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-1+b1 core libraries and binaries for al kdelibs recommends no packages. kdelibs suggests no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#516277: NMU?
Ian, The attched patch does seem to get this package buliding again. Would you like this to be NMUed? Do you inted to upload a fix? stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#516057: NMU?
Maintainer, The attached patch does indeed seem to get this package building again. Do you intend to make an uplaod soon? Would you like to have this bug NMUed? thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#507211: NMU?
Maintainer, The patch attached to this bug seems to get this package building again. Do you intend to upload a fix soon? Would you like this fix to be NMUed? thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#516057: diff for NMU
Attached is the interdiff for 20061109-0.2
thanks,
stew
diff -u acpica-unix-20061109/debian/patches/series
acpica-unix-20061109/debian/patches/series
--- acpica-unix-20061109/debian/patches/series
+++ acpica-unix-20061109/debian/patches/series
@@ -4,0 +5 @@
+fix-bison-ftbfs
diff -u acpica-unix-20061109/debian/changelog
acpica-unix-20061109/debian/changelog
--- acpica-unix-20061109/debian/changelog
+++ acpica-unix-20061109/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+acpica-unix (20061109-0.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload with permission of the maintainer.
+ * Apply patch to fix bison error (Thanks Matt Kraai) (Closes: 516057)
+ * Change incorrect GPL pointer from GPL to GPL-2
+
+ -- Mike O'Connor s...@debian.org Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:46:45 -0400
+
acpica-unix (20061109-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload with permission of the maintainer.
diff -u acpica-unix-20061109/debian/copyright
acpica-unix-20061109/debian/copyright
--- acpica-unix-20061109/debian/copyright
+++ acpica-unix-20061109/debian/copyright
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
- Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
+ Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'.
For the ACPICA Licence:
---
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- acpica-unix-20061109.orig/debian/patches/fix-bison-ftbfs
+++ acpica-unix-20061109/debian/patches/fix-bison-ftbfs
@@ -0,0 +1,1094 @@
+Index: acpica-unix-20061109/compiler/aslcompiler.y
+===
+--- acpica-unix-20061109.orig/compiler/aslcompiler.y 2009-03-18
23:06:39.0 -0400
acpica-unix-20061109/compiler/aslcompiler.y2009-03-18
23:06:48.0 -0400
+@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@
+ ;
+
+ DefinitionBlockTerm
+-: PARSEOP_DEFINITIONBLOCK '(' {$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_DEFINITIONBLOCK);}
++: PARSEOP_DEFINITIONBLOCK '(' {$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_DEFINITIONBLOCK);}
+ String ','
+ String ','
+ ByteConst ','
+@@ -,8 +,8 @@
+ ;
+
+ IncludeTerm
+-: PARSEOP_INCLUDE '(' {$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_INCLUDE);}
+-String ')' {$$ = TrLinkChildren
($n3,1,$4);FlOpenIncludeFile ($4);}
++: PARSEOP_INCLUDE '(' {$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_INCLUDE);}
++String ')' {$n$ = TrLinkChildren
($n3,1,$4);FlOpenIncludeFile ($4);}
+ TermList
+ IncludeEndTerm {$$ = TrLinkPeerNodes (3,$n3,$7,$8);}
+ ;
+@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@
+
+
+ BankFieldTerm
+-: PARSEOP_BANKFIELD '(' {$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_BANKFIELD);}
++: PARSEOP_BANKFIELD '(' {$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_BANKFIELD);}
+ NameString
+ NameStringItem
+ TermArgItem
+@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@
+ ;
+
+ CreateBitFieldTerm
+-: PARSEOP_CREATEBITFIELD '(' {$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEBITFIELD);}
++: PARSEOP_CREATEBITFIELD '(' {$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEBITFIELD);}
+ TermArg
+ TermArgItem
+ NameStringItem
+@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@
+ ;
+
+ CreateByteFieldTerm
+-: PARSEOP_CREATEBYTEFIELD '(' {$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEBYTEFIELD);}
++: PARSEOP_CREATEBYTEFIELD '(' {$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEBYTEFIELD);}
+ TermArg
+ TermArgItem
+ NameStringItem
+@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@
+ ;
+
+ CreateDWordFieldTerm
+-: PARSEOP_CREATEDWORDFIELD '('{$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEDWORDFIELD);}
++: PARSEOP_CREATEDWORDFIELD '('{$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEDWORDFIELD);}
+ TermArg
+ TermArgItem
+ NameStringItem
+@@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@
+ ;
+
+ CreateFieldTerm
+-: PARSEOP_CREATEFIELD '(' {$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEFIELD);}
++: PARSEOP_CREATEFIELD '(' {$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEFIELD);}
+ TermArg
+ TermArgItem
+ TermArgItem
+@@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@
+ ;
+
+ CreateQWordFieldTerm
+-: PARSEOP_CREATEQWORDFIELD '('{$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEQWORDFIELD);}
++: PARSEOP_CREATEQWORDFIELD '('{$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEQWORDFIELD);}
+ TermArg
+ TermArgItem
+ NameStringItem
+@@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@
+ ;
+
+ CreateWordFieldTerm
+-: PARSEOP_CREATEWORDFIELD '(' {$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEWORDFIELD);}
++: PARSEOP_CREATEWORDFIELD '(' {$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_CREATEWORDFIELD);}
+ TermArg
+ TermArgItem
+ NameStringItem
+@@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@
+ ;
+
+ DataRegionTerm
+-: PARSEOP_DATATABLEREGION '(' {$$ = TrCreateLeafNode
(PARSEOP_DATATABLEREGION);}
++: PARSEOP_DATATABLEREGION '(' {$n$ = TrCreateLeafNode
Bug#518489: debian/copyright is missing information, and contains incorrect information
Package: src: libcitadel
Version: 7.37-4
Severity: serious
Justification: 12.5
I was asked to review this source package in NEW, and found problems
with this package which caused me to reject the package. It appears
that the problems with this source also exist in the packages in stable,
testing, and unstable.
- Forwarded message from Mike O'Connor ftpmas...@debian.org -
From: Mike O'Connor ftpmas...@debian.org
To: Michael Meskes mes...@debian.org,
Debian Citadel Team pkg-citadel-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Cc: Debian Installer instal...@ftp-master.debian.org
Subject: libcitadel_7.42-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:54:26 +
Hi Maintainer,
REJECT: fix debian/copyright
I'm sorry, but I must reject this package at this time. I found several
problems with the debian/copyright file.
./lib/xdgmime contains code from many copyright holders not mentioned
in debian/copyright. Some examples:
./lib/xdgmime/xdgmimemagic.{c,h}
* Copyright (C) 2003 Jonathan Blandford j...@alum.mit.edu
./lib/xdgmime/{xdgmimeparent,xdgmimealias}.c:
* Copyright (C) 2004 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
possibly others.
---
Why is there no verbatim copy of the Academic Free License?
---
./lib/mime_parser.c says:
* This code is distributed under the GNU General Public License v3.
however debian/copyright states (at your option) any later version
which doesn't seem to be true for this file, at least
---
README.txt says:
This program is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public
License, version 3.
with no implication that (at your option) any later version applies.
This is also reiterated in COPYING, which says:
LibCitadel is distributed under the GPL V3.
with no mention of any later version.
--
Less important things that should be fixed.
README.txt says:
Copyright (c) 1987-2009 by the citadel.org development team.
so the years covered in the copyright notice in debian/copyright
should be extended
bye,
stew
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
- End forwarded message -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#518500: GPLv2/GPLv3 mix makes source undistributable
Package: webcit Version: 7.37-dfsg-6 Severity: serious Justification: 12.5 I was asked to review this source package in NEW, and found problems with this package which caused me to reject the package. It appears that some of the problems with this source also exist in the packages in stable, testing, and unstable. ./po/da.po, README.txt say: This program is released under the terms of the GNU General Public License v3 however debian/copyright is not referring to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3. None of the lcense texts in debian/copyright refer to GPL v3. he references to the gpl in debian/copyright refer to version 2 or later. -- ./static/BubbleTooltips.js says: * version is distributed as part of the Citadel system * under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2. This is a problem in that GPLv3 is not compatible with GPLv2. If this is GPLv2 and we have code which is GPLv3 or GPLv3+, this is not redistributable. Also, this file being GPLv2 only is not mentioned in debian/copyright -- ./static/dragdrop.js says: // (c) 2005-2007 Sammi Williams (http://www.oriontransfer.co.nz, sa...@oriontransfer.co.nz) but Sammi Williams is not mentioned in debian/copyright -- ./static/datepicker-dev.js says: * (c) 2007 Mathieu Jondet math...@eulerian.com * DatePicker is freely distributable under the same terms as Prototype. Mathieu Jondet is not mentioned in debian/copyright -- ./static/slider.js says: // Copyright (c) 2005-2007 Marty Haught, Thomas Fuchs but Marty Haught is not mentioned in debian/copyright -- ./static/controls.js says: // (c) 2005-2007 Ivan Krstic (http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ivan) // (c) 2005-2007 Jon Tirsen (http://www.tirsen.com) neither of these copyright holders is mentioned in debian/copyright. -- More minor things: ./static/scriptaculous.js says: // Copyright (c) 2005-2007 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us) so the copyright notice in debian/copyright should expand the years covered for Thomas Fuchs. --- upstream should be notified of the mistakes in many of the po files: # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package. They probably mean Citadel package or webcit package, or something similar. bye, stew - End forwarded message - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#516191: axiom: Incorrect maintainer address. email bounces
Package: axiom Version: 20081101-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 mail sent to the maintainer address for this package bounces with the following message: Dr. Camm Maguire is no longer employed by INTECH. Please email him at c...@maguirefamily.org instead. thanks, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages axiom depends on: pn axiom-databases none (no description available) ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgmp3c2 2:4.2.2+dfsg-3 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.7+20090105-1 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline5 5.2-3 GNU readline and history libraries ii libsm62:1.0.3-2 X11 Session Management library ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library ii libxaw7 2:1.0.4-2 X11 Athena Widget library ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxt61:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library Versions of packages axiom recommends: pn axiom-doc none (no description available) pn axiom-graphicsnone (no description available) pn axiom-hypertexnone (no description available) pn axiom-source none (no description available) Versions of packages axiom suggests: pn axiom-testnone (no description available) pn axiom-tex none (no description available) pn nowebmnone (no description available) pn texmacs none (no description available) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510782: python-excelerator: debian/copyright fails to mention copyright for antlr.py
Package: python-excelerator Version: 0.6.3a-3.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 python-excelerator contains an outdated copy of antlr.py from the antlr package, however the copyright file for python-excelerator doesn't contain the required attribution to the ANTLR project, the license for this file, nor does it mention the copyright for this file. I'd recommend not embedding an outdated copy of antlr.py and to depend on the antlr package instead. stew -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages python-excelerator depends on: ii python2.5.2-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-central0.6.8 register and build utility for Pyt python-excelerator recommends no packages. python-excelerator suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#495211: #495211 - libatomic-ops FTBFS on powerpc
OK, I've uploaded 1.2-4+lenny1 to testing-proposed-updates. Below is the interdiff between 1.2-4 and 1.2.4+lenny1: diff -u libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch --- libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch +++ libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ /* tried the y constraint.*/ __asm__ __volatile__ ( -lwz %0,%1\n -+lwz%X1 %0,%1\n ++lwz%U1%X1 %0,%1\n cmpw cr7,%0,%0\n bne- cr7,1f\n 1: isync\n diff -u libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/changelog libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/changelog --- libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/changelog +++ libatomic-ops-1.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +libatomic-ops (1.2-4+lenny1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * fixed debian/patches/05_powerpc_asm.patch to get it building on ppc again +(Closes: 495211) + * Uploading to testing-proposed-updates to fix the bug for lenny, becuase +the cvs version in unstable isn't a valid candidate for a freeze +exception. + + -- Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:26:06 -0400 + libatomic-ops (1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low * Closes: #463390 -- Add 06_double.patch to fix some issues with double signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#495211: #495211 - libatomic-ops FTBFS on powerpc
Release managers, This bug was fixed in sid by uploading a new cvs pull of the upstream source, which HE as noted, was not acceptable for a freeze exception. I have prepared and tested a minimal fix of this bug to the version of this package in lenny, which consists of a one line change to a file in debian/patches. I asked the maintainer if he plans to upload a fix to T-P-U and have not heard from him. May I NMU my fix to T-P-U to fix this bug? Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#498770: Unable to reproduce
tags 498770 unreproducible tags 498770 moreinfo thanks I'm also unable to reproduce this bug, Daniel, Can you still reproduce it? Can you rebuild the package with debugging info to get a better stacktrace? If you need help doing so, please ask. Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#493169: I can reproduce.
I can reprocude and get the same stacktrace on AMD64 iff I run both jackd and winecfg as root. when running them as a non-privileged user, i only get test-failed. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#498770: Unable to reproduce
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: Yes, I need help. I know how to get the source files and dependencies but I haven't worked out out to get dpkg-buildpackage to generate a debugging package. I've been trying to get a chance to read policy since the information is probably in there, but there's a lot of info. Here's a good set of instructions on getting a backtrace. Let me know if you still have problems: http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#495211: t-p-u upload?
Ian, In looking over outstanding RC bugs in lenny, I noticed #495211 which is still outstanding in lenny. Marc Brockschmidt has noted that the CVS pull that you uploaded in order to fix this bug in sid is not appropriate for a freeze exception to move to lenny. Do you have plans to try to make a patch to the lenny version which could be uploaded to t-p-u? Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#498145: wget: incomplete debian/copyright fails to mention GFDL
Package: wget Version: 1.11.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 12.5 The wget(1) manpage and the wget info page are both distributed under the terms of the GFDL, however /usr/share/doc/wget/copyright does not mention the GFDL. Here is a patch: diff -ruN wget-1.11.4.orig/debian/copyright wget-1.11.4/debian/copyright --- wget-1.11.4.orig/debian/copyright 2008-09-07 10:32:50.0 -0400 +++ wget-1.11.4/debian/copyright2008-09-07 10:38:14.0 -0400 @@ -25,3 +25,6 @@ file, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your version. +The wget(1) manpage and the wget info page are distributed under the +terms of the GNU Free Documentation License ; see +/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages wget depends on: ii libc6 2.7-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-13 SSL shared libraries wget recommends no packages. wget suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#497703: python-happydoc: Incomplete debian/copyright
Package: python-happydoc Version: 2.1-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 many of the files distributed in the python-happydoc package have Copyright statements in them which aren't reflected in /usr/share/doc/python-happydoc/copyright. For example: /usr/share/pyshared/happydoclib/docstring/StructuredText/ClassicDocumentClass.py contains: # Copyright (c) 2001 Zope Corporation and Contributors. All Rights # Reserved. # # This software is subject to the provisions of the Zope Public License, # Version 2.0 (ZPL). A copy of the ZPL should accompany this # distribution. /usr/share/pyshared/happydoclib/docset/mstruct_const.py contains: Copyright (C) 2001 by wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Other files which are copyrighted by the copyright holder mentioned in the copyright file are copyrighted in years other than 2000. Thanks, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages python-happydoc depends on: ii python2.5.2-1An interactive high-level object-o ii python-central0.6.8 register and build utility for Pyt python-happydoc recommends no packages. Versions of packages python-happydoc suggests: pn python-happydoc-doc none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494296: reassigning
retitle 494296 kdebase-bin: Uninstallable in Sid tag 494296 unreproducible reassign 494296 kdebase-bin thanks I cannot reproduce this bug either, marking it as unreproducible, but since this is a problem installing kdebase-bin not rosegarden, I'm reassigning. Can you please show us the output of apt-cache policy kdebase-bin and tell us what happens if you try to install kdebase-bin directly? stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#482223: patch
tags 482223 patch
Well this package got RMed before I was able to patch, but I'm sending a
patch anyway in case someone wants to pick this package back up.
Below is a dpatch which can be dropped into debian/patches and
debian/patches/00-list which gets libinstrudeo building again. I didn't
bother to test the resulting binaries.
thanks,
stew
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 04-fix-482223.dpatch by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
## DP: fix for http://bugs.debian.org/482223
@DPATCH@
diff -urNad libinstrudeo-0.1.4~/src/libinstrudeo/isdffmpegexporter.cpp
libinstrudeo-0.1.4/src/libinstrudeo/isdffmpegexporter.cpp
--- libinstrudeo-0.1.4~/src/libinstrudeo/isdffmpegexporter.cpp 2008-06-07
10:54:10.0 -0400
+++ libinstrudeo-0.1.4/src/libinstrudeo/isdffmpegexporter.cpp 2008-06-07
10:54:11.0 -0400
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@
av_freep(outputContext-streams[i]);
}
//close file
-url_fclose (outputContext-pb);
+url_fclose (outputContext-pb);
//free format context
av_free (outputContext);
diff -urNad libinstrudeo-0.1.4~/src/libinstrudeo/isdffmpegexporter.h
libinstrudeo-0.1.4/src/libinstrudeo/isdffmpegexporter.h
--- libinstrudeo-0.1.4~/src/libinstrudeo/isdffmpegexporter.h2007-01-10
07:31:39.0 -0500
+++ libinstrudeo-0.1.4/src/libinstrudeo/isdffmpegexporter.h 2008-06-07
10:55:21.0 -0400
@@ -47,8 +47,10 @@
#include libinstrudeo/isdexporter.h
-#include ffmpeg/avcodec.h
-#include ffmpeg/avformat.h
+extern C {
+#include ffmpeg/avcodec.h
+#include ffmpeg/avformat.h
+}
using namespace std;
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#484230: Fixed Upstream
tag 484230 fixed-upstream thanks This problem goes away when I use the newer freecycle-0.6.1.1alpha from upstream. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#484230: freecycle: segfaults when opening any .wav file
Package: freecycle Version: 0.6.1alpha-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable if I start freecycle as freecycle /path/to/wav or by starting it with no arguments or if start freecycle then use Open Wave from the File menu, freecycle segfaults. here's a stacktrace: (gdb) bt #0 0x2b74049ee117 in memcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x0044c7ce in SoundManager::applyEnvelope (this=0xe973d0, forceRedraw=false) at soundmanager.cpp:1863 #2 0x0044fbd2 in SoundManager::loadFile (this=0xe973d0) at soundmanager.cpp:884 #3 0x0042d282 in Freecycle::load (this=0xe2abb0, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at freecycle.cpp:654 #4 0x00433725 in main (argc=2, argv=value optimized out) at main.cpp:64 ) It doesn't seem to matter which wav I used. I also tried creating a wav with 1 second silence with: dd if=/dev/zero bs=16000 count=12 | sox -r 16000 -b -c 1 -t .raw -s - /tmp/silence.wav thanks, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages freecycle depends on: ii libasound2 1.0.16-2 ALSA library ii libaubio2 0.3.2-2+b2a library for audio segmentation ii libc6 2.7-10GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfftw3-3 3.1.2-3 library for computing Fast Fourier ii libfontconfig1 2.5.0-2 generic font configuration library ii libgcc11:4.3.0-3 GCC support library ii libice62:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjack0 0.109.2-1.1 JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii libjpeg62 6b-14 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.27-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.8b-5Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-1+b1 X11 Session Management library ii libsndfile11.0.17-4 Library for reading/writing audio ii libsoundtouch1c2 1.3.1-2 sound stretching library ii libstdc++6 4.3.0-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-7 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime freecycle recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#483320: patch
tags 483320 patch thanks below is a patch which gets maint-guide building again. thanks, stew diff -ru maint-guide-1.2.12+nmu1.orig/debian/rules maint-guide-1.2.12+nmu1/debian/rules --- maint-guide-1.2.12+nmu1.orig/debian/rules 2008-06-03 11:21:47.0 -0400 +++ maint-guide-1.2.12+nmu1/debian/rules2008-06-03 11:21:00.0 -0400 @@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ build: stamp-build stamp-build: $(name).sgml dh_testdir - $(MAKE) BUILD_TYPE=$(BUILD_TYPE) validate all + $(MAKE) MANUAL=maint-guide BUILD_TYPE=$(BUILD_TYPE) validate all touch $@ clean: dh_testdir dh_testroot - $(MAKE) BUILD_TYPE=$(BUILD_TYPE) clean + $(MAKE) MANUAL=maint-guide BUILD_TYPE=$(BUILD_TYPE) clean # Remove unbuild sources for now dh_clean stamp-build debian/$(name)-*.p* signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#478484: (no subject)
notfixed 478484 0.4.5-7 thanks oops. -7 failed to fix this issue. It is fixed by -8 instead. sorry. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#481261: recordmydesktop expects .ogv
tags 481261 pending thanks The problem here is that recordmydesktop expects to be recording to a file ending in .ogv, when krecordmydesktop requests to record to a file ending in .tmp, recordmydesktop actually records to .tmp.ogv. I'll prepare a qa upload to address this bug. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#477454: this bug is not RC
tag 477454 upstream severity 477454 minor thanks Although this abuse is unfortunate, I fail to see what makes this bug release critical. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#476999: patch
tags 476999 patch Attached is a patch which fixes this bug. thanks, stew diff -ruN gnupg2-2.0.9.orig/keyserver/gpgkeys_curl.c gnupg2-2.0.9/keyserver/gpgkeys_curl.c --- gnupg2-2.0.9.orig/keyserver/gpgkeys_curl.c 2008-04-21 23:24:29.0 -0400 +++ gnupg2-2.0.9/keyserver/gpgkeys_curl.c 2008-04-21 23:26:12.0 -0400 @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ curl_easy_setopt(curl,CURLOPT_VERBOSE,1); } - curl_easy_setopt(curl,CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER,opt-flags.check_cert); + curl_easy_setopt(curl,CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER,(long)opt-flags.check_cert); curl_easy_setopt(curl,CURLOPT_CAINFO,opt-ca_cert_file); if(proxy) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#476169: pending NMU
tags 476169 pending thanks I'm planning to NMU this package with the aforementioned patch on April 21st unless someone beats me to it. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#476169: patch
tags 476169 patch thanks Attached is a patch which fixes this bug. thanks, stew diff -ruN capisuite-0.4.5.orig/debian/patches/python2.5-fix-build.diff capisuite-0.4.5/debian/patches/python2.5-fix-build.diff --- capisuite-0.4.5.orig/debian/patches/python2.5-fix-build.diff 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500 +++ capisuite-0.4.5/debian/patches/python2.5-fix-build.diff 2008-04-17 09:41:44.0 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +--- src/application/pythonscript.cpp.orig 2008-04-17 09:33:52.0 -0400 src/application/pythonscript.cpp 2008-04-17 09:35:07.0 -0400 +@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ + if ( !(py_traceback=cStringIO-cgetvalue(catch_stderr)) ) + throw ApplicationError(unable to get traceback,PythonScript::run()); + +- int length; ++ Py_ssize_t length; + char *traceback; + if (PyString_AsStringAndSize(py_traceback, traceback, length)) + throw ApplicationError(unable to convert traceback to char*,PythonScript::run()); signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#474855: patch
tag 474855 patch
thanks
Attached is a patch which fixes this bug.
Thanks,
stew
diff -ru pearpc-0.4.0.orig/src/cpu/cpu_jitc_x86/x86asm.h pearpc-0.4.0/src/cpu/cpu_jitc_x86/x86asm.h
--- pearpc-0.4.0.orig/src/cpu/cpu_jitc_x86/x86asm.h 2008-04-15 02:51:52.0 -0400
+++ pearpc-0.4.0/src/cpu/cpu_jitc_x86/x86asm.h 2008-04-15 02:52:39.0 -0400
@@ -384,8 +384,8 @@
void FASTCALL jitcClobberClientRegisterForFloat(int creg);
void FASTCALL jitcInvalidateClientRegisterForFloat(int creg);
JitcFloatReg FASTCALL jitcGetClientFloatRegisterMapping(int creg);
-JitcFloatReg FASTCALL jitcGetClientFloatRegister(int creg, JitcFloatReg hint1=JITC_FLOAT_REG_NONE, JitcFloatReg hint1=JITC_FLOAT_REG_NONE);
-JitcFloatReg FASTCALL jitcGetClientFloatRegisterUnmapped(int creg, JitcFloatReg hint1=JITC_FLOAT_REG_NONE, JitcFloatReg hint1=JITC_FLOAT_REG_NONE);
+JitcFloatReg FASTCALL jitcGetClientFloatRegister(int creg, JitcFloatReg hint1=JITC_FLOAT_REG_NONE, JitcFloatReg hint2=JITC_FLOAT_REG_NONE);
+JitcFloatReg FASTCALL jitcGetClientFloatRegisterUnmapped(int creg, JitcFloatReg hint1=JITC_FLOAT_REG_NONE, JitcFloatReg hint2=JITC_FLOAT_REG_NONE);
JitcFloatReg FASTCALL jitcMapClientFloatRegisterDirty(int creg, JitcFloatReg freg=JITC_FLOAT_REG_NONE);
enum X86FloatFlagTest {
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#474809: fixed-upstream
tags 474809 fixed-upstream thanks This bug is fixed upstream, there is a 0.8.0 release of gxneur to go with the 0.8.0 release of xneur: http://xneur.ru/wiki/Downloads since this newer release of neur changed public structs, this SHOULD have been an soname bump in libxnconfig9, right? stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#476224: gxneur: missing source files
Package: gxneur Version: 0.6.2-2 Severity: serious The following files: src/interface.c src/interface.h src/support.c src/support.h contain the header: /* * DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - it is generated by Glade. */ There are no glade source files included in the .orig.tar.gz from which these files can be generated. The license under which we are distributing this software (GPL V2) requires that source code be made available for this software and defines source code as the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. Checking the upstream svn repository with: svn ls svn://xneur.ru:3690/xneur/gxneur I see that the glade source files are available from upstream. Thanks, stew -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#476224: gxneur: missing source files
Do you think, we need to provide such files in debian source package? Absolutely, it is required by the license, since this is the preferred form for modification. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#476017: patch
tags 476017 patch thanks attached is a patch which fixes this error. Thanks, stew diff -ru zimpl-2.05.ds2.orig/debian/rules zimpl-2.05.ds2/debian/rules --- zimpl-2.05.ds2.orig/debian/rules 2008-04-14 23:03:38.0 -0400 +++ zimpl-2.05.ds2/debian/rules 2008-04-14 23:06:38.0 -0400 @@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ build: build-stamp build-stamp: patch-stamp dh_testdir - CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CPPFLAGS=$(CPPFLAGS) $(MAKE) + CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CPPFLAGS=$(CPPFLAGS) $(MAKE) ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE), $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)) - CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CPPFLAGS=$(CPPFLAGS) $(MAKE) check + CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CPPFLAGS=$(CPPFLAGS) $(MAKE) check endif touch $@ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#476026: (no subject)
tags 476026 patch
thanks
attached is a patch which fixes this bug.
Thanks,
stew
diff -ru survex-1.0.39.1.orig/debian/rules survex-1.0.39.1/debian/rules
--- survex-1.0.39.1.orig/debian/rules 2008-04-14 23:18:24.0 -0400
+++ survex-1.0.39.1/debian/rules 2008-04-14 23:18:45.0 -0400
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
build-stamp:
dh_testdir
- ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man --enable-docdir=\$${prefix}/share/doc/survex CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CXXFLAGS=$(CXXFLAGS) STRIP=$(STRIP)
+ ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man --enable-docdir=\$${prefix}/share/doc/survex CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CXXFLAGS=$(CXXFLAGS) STRIP=$(STRIP)
$(MAKE)
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE))
$(MAKE) check
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#441720: interdiff for NMU
attached is an interdiff for an NMU for this bug. diff -u multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/changelog multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/changelog --- multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/changelog +++ multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +multisync0.90 (0.91.0-4.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Make sure .deb contains the same files when built twice (Closes: #441720) + + -- Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:12:30 -0500 + multisync0.90 (0.91.0-4) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/05_fix_desktop_file.patch: New file, fixes binary diff -u multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/rules multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/rules --- multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/rules +++ multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/rules @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ clean: unpatch dh_testdir dh_testroot - rm -f configure-stamp build-stamp patch-stamp tarballs-stamp + rm -f configure-stamp build-stamp patch-stamp tarballs-stamp install-stamp -rm -r build-tree dh_clean signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#427834: any progress?
Has any progress been made on fixing this bug? I'm interested in seeing this package be included in lenny. If there has not yet been any effort into making this package installable on ia64, or to make it compliant with the new python policy, I'd be happy to work on getting it there. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#444718: (no subject)
retitle 444718 RM: sope -- RoQA; NPOASR; RC-Buggy reassign 444718 ftp.debian.org severity 444718 normal thanks sope was never released upstream. It is currently buggy, unmaintained, and has never been part of a stable release. I think it therefore makes a good candidate for removal. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#441711: another patch
Here is an interdiff of the NMU I have failed to find a sponsor for. it is a one line fix to debian/rules and a missing build-dep on gettext. I continue to look for a sponsor. thanks, stew diff -u kanatest-0.4.2/debian/rules kanatest-0.4.2/debian/rules --- kanatest-0.4.2/debian/rules +++ kanatest-0.4.2/debian/rules @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ build-stamp: config.status dh_testdir $(MAKE) + $(MAKE) -C po update-po touch build-stamp clean: diff -u kanatest-0.4.2/debian/changelog kanatest-0.4.2/debian/changelog --- kanatest-0.4.2/debian/changelog +++ kanatest-0.4.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +kanatest (0.4.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * make sure docs/*.pmo are built (Closes: #441711) + * add missing build-depends on gettext + + -- Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:24:35 -0400 + kanatest (0.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: diff -u kanatest-0.4.2/debian/control kanatest-0.4.2/debian/control --- kanatest-0.4.2/debian/control +++ kanatest-0.4.2/debian/control @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Games Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0), quilt, libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.0), libxml2-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0), quilt, libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.0), libxml2-dev, gettext Standards-Version: 3.7.2 XS-Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-games/packages/trunk/kanatest XS-Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-games/packages/trunk/kanatest/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#441711: Info received (another patch)
tags 441711 pending thanks I got bdefreese-guest to commit the patch to the debian-games svn repository, however he is not able to upload. Marking the bug as pending until a sponsor can be found. thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441720: patch
tags 441720 patch thanks The fix for this bug is to make sure the clean target also removes install-stamp. below is a patch. thanks, stew diff -ruN multisync0.90-0.91.0.orig/debian/rules multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/rules --- multisync0.90-0.91.0.orig/debian/rules 2007-11-05 07:57:46.0 -0500 +++ multisync0.90-0.91.0/debian/rules 2007-11-05 07:58:04.0 -0500 @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ clean: unpatch dh_testdir dh_testroot - rm -f configure-stamp build-stamp patch-stamp tarballs-stamp + rm -f configure-stamp build-stamp patch-stamp tarballs-stamp install-stamp -rm -r build-tree dh_clean signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#441727: remove test.d entirely?
I don't see the utility of installing the test.d directory in examples in the first place. Perhaps the fix for this would be to remove test.d from debian/examples. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#441715: patch: typo in debian/rules
tags 441715 patch thanks This is due to a typo in the debian/rules script. Below is a patch which fixes this bug. thanks, stew -- diff -ruN libscalar-properties-perl-0.12.orig/debian/rules libscalar-properties-perl-0.12/debian/rules --- libscalar-properties-perl-0.12.orig/debian/rules2007-11-04 09:22:46.0 -0500 +++ libscalar-properties-perl-0.12/debian/rules 2007-11-04 09:23:00.0 -0500 @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ clean: dh_testdir dh_testroot - rm -f build-stamp install_stamp + rm -f build-stamp install-stamp [ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) realclean dh_clean signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#441711: patch
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:57:43AM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: Do you also need to add dependencies (such as gettext) to the package? Jens gettext was being pulled in by the dependency on quilt. But since we are calling a binary in gettext, I agree, we should build-depend on gettext. Attached is an updated patch. I'll prepare to NMU this. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#441711: patch
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:57:43AM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:07:57AM -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote: tags 441711 patch thanks Here is a simple fix to this bug that ensures .pmo files are rebuit. thanks, stew diff -ruN kanatest-0.4.2.orig/debian/rules kanatest-0.4.2/debian/rules --- kanatest-0.4.2.orig/debian/rules2007-11-01 00:02:23.0 -0400 +++ kanatest-0.4.2/debian/rules 2007-11-01 00:02:40.0 -0400 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ build-stamp: config.status dh_testdir $(MAKE) + $(MAKE) -C po update-po touch build-stamp Do you also need to add dependencies (such as gettext) to the package? Jens It builds fine under pbuilder as it is now. I'll look into how gettext is being pulled in later today. Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#443053: block by 428060
block 443053 by 428060 thanks There are many other similar FTBFS bugs which are the result of new ghcs6 being recompiled by gcc4.2 with its new optimizations. Once they settle on the right set of optimiztions to turn off when compiling ghcs6, this bug should go away. Please refer to #428060 for more information. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
