Bug#1079477: plasma-mobile: FTBFS

2024-09-07 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi Marco,

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:51:23 +0200 Marco Mattiolo 
 wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> thank you for the note. I'm answering to the shell's bug, but the
> topic  is similar for the other 5 bugs of the packages I'm
> maintaining, as well.
> 
> I'm quite inclined to let it broken and then fix it with the Plasma6 
> upload to sid, if that will be possible in a reasonable amount of
> time: without making promises, do you think it's going to be matter of
> couple of weeks / a month / 2 months /... ? As a ballpark, plasma-
> mobile has the same build-deps like plasma-desktop.

We have 2 bugs left to fix and then we'd like to upload Plasma 6 to 
unstable. We also need to give users a heads-up and maintainers of 
reverse dependencies a final warning that stuff will break.

We don't have an ETA, but it's likely a matter of 2-4 weeks.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079483: spacebar: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: spacebar
Version: 23.01.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079477: plasma-mobile: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: plasma-mobile
Version: 5.27.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079480: qmlkonsole: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: qmlkonsole
Version: 23.08.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079479: plasma-settings: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: plasma-settings
Version: 23.01.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079478: plasma-phonebook: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: plasma-phonebook
Version: 23.01.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079476: plasma-dialer: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: plasma-dialer
Version: 23.01.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079472: krecorder: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: krecorder
Version: 23.08.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079470: kasts: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: kasts
Version: 23.08.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079471: kclock: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: kclock
Version: 23.08.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079469: angelfish: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Source: angelfish
Version: 23.04.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1079468: alligator: FTBFS

2024-08-23 Thread Patrick Franz
Package: alligator
Version: alligator
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package currently build-depends on "kirigami-addons-dev".
The version in unstable is Qt 5-based whereas a newer version in
experimental is Qt 6-based and will stay Qt 6-only.
Uploading said version to unstable would break all reverse dependencies.
Therefore we created a new source package "kirigami-addons5" which is
and will stay Qt 5-based. This package is already available in unstable.

Unfortunately, by uploading kirigami-addons5 to unstable, we accidently
broke kirigami-addons-dev and hence your package currently FTBFS.
We are sorry for this.

However, the fix for the build failure is quite trivial: Simply replace
the "kirigami-addons-dev" build-dependency with "kirigami-addons5-dev".
That will make your package build again.

Again sorry for the inconvenience.


-- 
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1076729: libwayland: breaks plasma desktop start after last upgrade to version 1.23.0-1

2024-07-24 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi,

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 18:22:02 + Jaycee Santos 
 wrote:
> According to [1], rebuilding kwin fixes the issue. 
> Will the auto-kwayland transition[2] handle this?

No, that transition is something else.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1074633: qt6-base: upgrading libqt6core6t64 removes qpdfview and wireshark instead of upgrading them

2024-07-03 Thread Patrick Franz
Hej Vincent,

Am Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2024, 01:02:28 CEST schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
[...]
> In particular, "apt install libqt6core6t64" wants to remove
> qt6-wayland, but if I try "apt install libqt6core6t64 qt6-wayland",
> then the upgrade is fine. So there seems to be really something
> wrong with the Qt package relationships.

The dependencies of Qt are fine, you just ended up in an unfortunate 
situation that makes it look as if the dependencies in Qt are wrong.

The upgrade from Qt 6.4 to 6.6 involves a number of Break+Replaces, but 
that doesn't mean anything is wrong.

In your first example, you only wanted to upgrade libqt6core6t64. The 
thing here is that there are multiple solutions about what to do with 
the reverse dependencies. Some solutions remove a lot of them and 
install as little as possible, others replace a bunch of libs and remove 
fewer packages.
You asked apt to upgrade libqt6core6t64 and that is exactly what apt 
did. The issue is that the proposed solution is correct, but it's just 
not your preferred one.
In your second example, removing all those libraries without replacing 
them is not a viable option, because that would make wireshark 
uninstallable. Therefore, apt installs a number of libs to satisfy the 
dependencies of wireshark.

So in both cases, apt proposes a solution that does exactly what you 
asked it for. In the first example, there are multiple solutions and apt 
happened to pick one that you don't want. Why it picked that one and not 
another one, I do not know. Maybe it found this solution quicker.
But all that doesn't mean that the dependencies in Qt are wrong. In 
fact, all the libs that apt wants to remove are not compatible with 
libqt6core6t64 6.6.2 and therefore removing them is correct.

I absolutely do not see that this is a problem with Qt's dependencies. 
It's just that apt gives you a correct solution that you don't like and 
hence have to adjust the upgrade command slightly. But nothing is wrong 
with Qt's dependencies.

You can either close this bug or you can re-assign the bug to apt and 
turn it into a wishlist item suggesting that apt give you more than 1 
solution in such cases.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1074633: qt6-base: upgrading libqt6core6t64 removes qpdfview and wireshark instead of upgrading them

2024-07-02 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi Vincent,

this seems more a problem of apt than of Qt.

For some reason, apt is not able to resolve the dependencies when you 
only want to upgrade libqt6core6t64, but is able to do so when you want 
to upgrade libqt6core6t64 and wireshark.

To me, that means that the dependencies in Qt are correct (that it wants 
to replace some libqt6...t64 packages with non-t64 versions is the 
correct solution).

Have you tried upgrading just libqt6core6t64 with aptitude ?

I'm inclined to reassign this bug to apt as the dependencies can clearly 
be resolved and IMO this is down to the resolver.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



debian-bugs-rc@lists.debian.org

2024-07-02 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi,

On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:39:27 +0200 Marco Mattiolo 
 wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
> 
> I'm the maintainer of plasma-mobile package in Debian, plus some of  
> the related apps. At the moment, the present bug keeps meta-plasma-
> mobile metapackage out of trixie, thus letting the building of Mobian 
> plasma-mobile images to fail [1]. As I wrote in the previous message, 
> looking into buildd and reproducible-builds, I thought this to be 
> solved, but from your attachment I see I shouldn't have assumed.
> 
> I'm not the maintainer of wacomtablet, so I'm not sure what to touch 
> if tests are still failing. I see in your attachment that the error
> message is always the same as in the original report, then I'd try
> e.g. [2] that I see is not implemented in d/rules for wacomtablet,
> but maybe it's just better to wait for the new version of wacomtablet
> (6.1.0-1 now in experimental) to be uploaded to sid and check how that
> new version behaves.

I don't have the resources to dig into why the tests are failing, but I 
could disable them for the time being if wacomtablet is a blocker for 
something right now.

We will definitely revisit this once the new version in exp (now part of 
Plasma 6) can be compiled there.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1073480: zstdTargets.cmake: missing targets zstd::libzstd_shared, zstd::libzstd_static, zstd::libzstd

2024-06-29 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi,

On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:01:44 +0900 yokota  wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I think this bug is not a libzstd's bug but qt6-base's bug.
> 
> Please check this QTBUG.
> > [#QTBUG-119469] Targets not yet defined: zstd::libzstd_static
> > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-119469
> 
> The QTBUG said this bug was fixed in Qt 6.7.2, so update Qt to 6.7.2
> will fixes the problem.
> 
> Or, back port QTBUG-119469 fix from git commits.
> https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/log/?qt=grep&q=QTBUG-119469
> 
> PS:
> Arch Linux also have this bug.
> > https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/qt6-doc/-/
issues/1

Backporting these commits does not solve the issue for me. Maybe I am 
doing something wrong, but I still get the error in qt6-tools.

If anybody else wants to take a crack a it, go ahead. Because I cannot 
spend any more time on this.

Short of updating Qt to 6.7.2 or completely disabling zstd support in 
Qt, I'm kinda out of options. I cannot judge the consequence of removing 
zstd support and updating Qt will take several weeks at least.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1074264: marked as pending in kdecoration

2024-06-25 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1074264 in kdecoration reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/kdecoration/-/commit/7732fcfd78ad10402ad8a60b302db7aac300e558


Add missing Breaks+Replaces for libkdecorations2-6 against libkdecorations2-5v5 
(Closes: #1074264).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1074264



Bug#1074165: marked as pending in kscreenlocker

2024-06-24 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1074165 in kscreenlocker reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/kscreenlocker/-/commit/162ac2ad16ae8167a59793dcf8921898788f846c


Add missing Breaks+Replaces for libkscreenlocker6 against libkscreenlocker5 
(Closes: #1074165).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1074165



Bug#1074227: goldencheetah: Unsatisfiable build-dependencies

2024-06-24 Thread Patrick Franz
Package: goldencheetah
Version: 1:3.5-5
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package has unsatisfiable build-dependencies, specifically
libqt5widgets5 and libqt5concurrent5.
These packages have been superseded by libqt5widgets5t64 and
libqt5concurrent5t64 respectively.

Build-depending on them is neither necessary nor recommended as the
corresponding packages are pulled automatically by qtbase5-dev.


--
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1074226: sonic-visualiser: FTBFS on armel/armhf

2024-06-24 Thread Patrick Franz
Package: sonic-visualiser
Version: 4.5.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package FTBFS on armel/armhf is therefore stuck on unsatisfiable
dependencies. See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sonic-visualiser&arch=armel&ver=4.5.2-2%2Bb3&stamp=1713251413&raw=0
and
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sonic-visualiser&arch=armhf&ver=4.5.2-2%2Bb3&stamp=1713249425&raw=0


--
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1026957: (no subject)

2024-06-24 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi,

I'm raising the severity to serious as the explicit dependency to
libqt6core6 causes the package to have unsatisfiable dependencies.

The package libqt6core6 has been superseded by libqt6core6t64. And as 
already mentioned, these explicit dependencies to the Qt libraries 
should not be needed.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1074221: morph-browser: FTBFS on mips64el

2024-06-24 Thread Patrick Franz
Package: morph-browser
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package fails to build on mips64el and can therefore not migrate
to testing. See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=morph-browser&arch=mips64el&ver=1.1.0%2Bdfsg-2&stamp=1716667926&raw=0


--
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1074219: eln: Build-Depends on unsatisfiable dependencies on armel/mips64el/ppc64el/s390x

2024-06-24 Thread Patrick Franz
Package: eln
Version: 1.5.4-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

your package build-depends on qt6-pdf-dev, 
qml6-module-qtwebengine-controlsdelegates
and qml6-module-qtwebengine on armel/mips64el/ppc64el/s390x.
However, these packages only exist on amd64/arm64/armhf/i386.

This prevents the packages from being built on these architectures and thus from
migrating to testing.


--
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1074218: dogecoin: FTBFS because of symbol errors

2024-06-24 Thread Patrick Franz
Package: dogecoin
Version: 1.14.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

the package FTBFS on amd64 due to symbol errors. See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dogecoin&arch=amd64&ver=1.14.7-1&stamp=1716846348&raw=0

--
Regards

Patrick Franz



Bug#1074071: marked as pending in libkscreen

2024-06-22 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1074071 in libkscreen reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/libkscreen/-/commit/db2b3255dd90db720fbb5512dc195394327ebf9e


Add missing Breaks+Replaces for libkf6screen-bin against libkf5screen-bin 
(Closes: #1074071).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1074071



Bug#1073394: ktextaddons: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libkf6archive-dev (>= 6.0.0~), libkf6configwidgets-dev (>= 6.0.0~), libkf6coreaddons-dev (>= 6.0.0~), libkf6i18n-dev (>= 6.0.0~), lib

2024-06-18 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi,

the package was accidentally uploaded to unstable instead of 
experimental and therefore has unsatisfiable build-dependencies.

This will be solved once the KDE Frameworks 6 are uploaded to unstable. 
But since ktextaddons currently does not have any reverse dependencies 
in Debian, I'll leave it at that.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#998197: kdeconnectd: should not listen on all interfaces by default

2024-05-09 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: severity -1 important

Hi Witold,

On Tue, 07 May 2024 02:36:46 + Witold Baryluk 
 wrote:
[...]
> Elevating severity, because it looks like I didn't even installed this
> package (I did inspect all apt-get install invokations since system
> creation), and it kdeconnect could only be installed due to some
> suggests / recommends, not due to any dependency or direct request.

How the package was installed on your system, I don't know, but as you 
suspect it was likely a recommendation of another package.

Regarding the issue at hand:
I can see why you consider this a problem. But unfortunately, there is 
no way of changing that behaviour, I suspect the behaviour might be 
intentional. People have requested this feature upstream (https://
bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432378) and even asked for ways to disable 
kdeconnectd (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417615). The latter 
bug report could give you ideas how to achieve that.

If this issue poses a serious problem for you, you can remove kdeconnect 
from your system. That might also give you a hint why it was installed 
in the first place. Upstream KDE actually recommends installing 
kdeconnect as part of the Plasma installation. Whether that 
recommendation fits the Debian's recommendation, is yet to be determined 
and we might have to see over the recommendation.

However, I do disagree about the severity of this. I don't think that 
this issue warrants the removal of kdeconnect from Debian and hence, I'm 
lowering it to important.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1070254: ktp-text-ui FTBFS: undefined reference to `snappy::RawCompress(char const*, unsigned long, char*, unsigned long*)'

2024-05-02 Thread Patrick Franz
Hej,

Am Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2024, 15:24:07 CEST schrieb Helmut Grohne:
> Source: ktp-text-ui
> Version: 22.12.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in
> the past)
> 
> ktp-text-ui fails to build from source in unstable on amd64. The

[...] 

> | /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5.15.10 /usr/bin/ld:
> | /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5.15.15: undefined
> | reference to `snappy::RawCompress(char const*, unsigned long,
> | char*, unsigned long*)' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

That looks like it's https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
bug=1070254 for which a fix has been uploaded.

I guess trying to rebuild it tomorrow will fix this build error.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1067657: marked as pending in frameworkintegration

2024-03-25 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1067657 in frameworkintegration reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/frameworkintegration/-/commit/04bff0539332af222a4b818c9caf0eab9f5f35c6


Depend on libqt5widgets5t64 instead of libqt5widgets5 (Closes: #1067657).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1067657



Bug#1000115: marked as pending in kjs

2024-03-18 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1000115 in kjs reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/kjs/-/commit/8feb0197184521eb7c6952af95d7abe5812f22e8


Port to PCRE2, thx to Yavor Doganov (Closes: #1000112, #1000115).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1000115



Bug#1000112: marked as pending in kjs

2024-03-18 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1000112 in kjs reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/kjs/-/commit/8feb0197184521eb7c6952af95d7abe5812f22e8


Port to PCRE2, thx to Yavor Doganov (Closes: #1000112, #1000115).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1000112



Bug#1061205: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-02-04 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi,

I have a patch that makes qt6-tools build with llvm-toolchain-17.

However, qt6-tools in affected by the ongoing 64bit time_t transition 
and I don't want to interfere with that.

I can upload the patch once qt6-tools has been uploaded to unstable for 
the transition.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1042018: qt6-declarative: FTBFS on hppa - Segmentation fault in /usr/lib/qt6/bin/qsb

2023-07-25 Thread Patrick Franz
severity -1 normal
thanks

Hi,

since hppa is not an officially supported architecture, I'm downgrading 
the severity.

Due to the lack of resources, it's unlikely we'll even investigate this. 
However, if you have a patch, I'm happy to apply it.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1035732: libkscreenlocker5: Endless loop when using PAM

2023-05-13 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi Andreas,

On Mon, 8 May 2023 14:15:17 +0200 "Poenicke, Andreas (TKM)" 
 wrote:
> Package: libkscreenlocker5
> Version: 5.20.5-1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: patch upstream
> Justification: breaks the whole system
[...]
> Please include the short patch
> https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kscreenlocker/-/commit/fca315cf72826f93eda7a026016b33818b9d1f39
> to kscreenlocker-5.20.5 in bullseye.

Thanks for reporting this. I have applied the patch onto the version
in bullseye and uploaded it here: 

https://people.debian.org/~deltaone/kscreenlocker/

Could be so kind and install it ? If you can confirm it fixes your issue,
I'll prepare the upload for stable.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1032240: akonadi server fails to start since it cannot connect to mysql database

2023-03-10 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi,

the issue is connected to MariaDB when upgrading after the shutdown was 
not clean, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
bug=1032047#40

We are trying to find a solution for this.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1027474: marked as pending in qbs

2023-01-01 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1027474 in qbs reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qbs/-/commit/94c6a1ac0a137fc74c39904c03f21b920ca5ee7e


Update symbols from buildlogs (Closes: #1027474).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1027474



Bug#1000955: libkf5globalaccel-bin: /usr/bin/kglobalaccel5 eats up huge amount of CPU after suspend

2022-11-10 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi Filippo,

I have noticed a similar behaviour. However, the behaviour has improved 
significantly (at least for me) and in recent versions of 
libkf5globalaccel-bin the CPU bursts after connecting e.g. a mouse with 
a USB connector are only relatively short (a couple of seconds maybe 
depending on your machine).

Could you try to run a recent KDE stack with testing or unstable and see 
if the issue is still as bad ?

For some people, the issue was apparently caused by ~/.Xmodmap. Can you 
check whether you have such a file ? Thank you.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1019712: marked as pending in zanshin

2022-09-13 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1019712 in zanshin reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/zanshin/-/commit/318e97a7575956907c7f43e80178b12043686815


New upstream release (Closes: #1019712).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1019712



Bug#1017591: libkf5service5: missing symbols in library

2022-08-18 Thread Patrick Franz
control: severity -1 important

Hi Oswald,

On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 07:04:32 +0200 Oswald Buddenhagen 
 wrote:
> Package: libkf5service5
> Version: 5.97.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> /usr/bin/startplasma-x11: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/libKF5Service.so.5: undefined symbol: _ZN8KSandbox9isFlatpakEv

That looks like as if you're using an old version of libkf5coreaddons5 
(5.95 or older). Have you compiled that on your own and loaded that one 
instead ?

Can you please post the output of "ldd -r /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/
libKF5Service.so.5" ?


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1014022: kalendar segfaults immediately on start

2022-07-31 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: severity -1 important
Control: reassign -1 akonadi
thanks

Hi,

I cannot reproduce this. When I start kalendar with a fresh user on a 
default installation, it starts as expected for me.

Looking at the output, it seems like an akonadiserver issue rather than 
a kalendar issue, reassigning it therefore.


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#1002721: okular: segfaults when trying to open a signed PDF

2022-02-21 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: 1002721 severity important
thanks

Hi Pablo,

can you point to a PDF document available on the web that causes Okular 
to segfault for you such that I can try to reproduce it ?


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#998205: plasma-desktop: unable to log into Plasma desktop

2021-11-01 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi Gary,

KDE Plasma is currently broken in testing. Do you have a mixed Plasma, 
e.g. some packages from 5.21.5 and some from 5.23.0 ?

If yes, then please see the following bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996726


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#996761: kwin-x11: KWin crashes and doesn't start

2021-10-18 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi,

I assume you're using testing. Unfortunately, Plasma is broken in 
testing at the moment if you have upgraded libkdecorations2-5v5 to 5.23. 
Could you check that ?

If this is the case, I wrote about a possible solution here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996726#10


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#993071: kmail: symbol lookup error: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5Libkleo.so.5: undefined symbol: _ZN5GpgME6UserID9SignatureltERKS1_

2021-08-27 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi Johannes,

I cannot reproduce the issue on an up-to-date unstable.
kmail starts as expected.

Do you maybe still have an older version of some package running that 
causes the error ?


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz



Bug#911067: chromium: Conflict with chrome-gnome-shell /etc/chromium

2018-10-15 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:28:05 +0200  wrote:
> Package: chromium
> Version: 70.0.3538.54-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 10.7.4
> 
> dpkg: erreur de traitement de l'archive /var/cache/apt/archives/
chromium_70.0.3538.54-2_amd64.deb (--unpack) :
>  tentative de remplacement du répertoire « /etc/chromium » dans le 
paquet chrome-gnome-shell 10.1-1 avec un élément de type différent

In my case, it conflicts with plasma-browser-integration, but I think 
it's the same error:

dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs /var/cache/apt/archives/
chromium_70.0.3538.54-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 Versuch, Verzeichnis »/etc/chromium« in Paket plasma-browser-
integration 5.13.5-1 mit Nichtverzeichnis zu überschreiben


Essentially it says, that it tries to override /etc/chromium in the 
package plasma-browser-integration with a "non-directory".


-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz