Bug#560238: bindv6only again
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:46:48PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: - as explained in #560238, it is still not the time to make a choice Not sure what you mean here. Anyway, is there a reason that #560238 isn't blocked by #560044 given it breaks that package or are you not bothered about breaking non-free software? Simon. -- Just another wannabie | I get mail; therefore I am. | Just another fool --+ - Dilbert+--- This message was brought to you by the letter H and the number 20. htag.pl 0.0.24 -- http://www.earth.li/projectpurple/progs/htag.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#519181: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#519181: xfce4-sensors-plugin: Reported upstream; fix in the works
forwarded 519181 http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4690 thanks On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:21:40PM -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote: I created an account at bugzilla.xfce.org and reported the bug upstream. A developer there has acknowledged the bug, and says that a fix for it will be applied to their subversion repository. Sorry that I don't know how to tag this bug report with the upstream tag, or even whether ordinary users have permissions to do so. Could someone who knows how apply such a tag for me? The thread on the XFCE bugzilla is here: http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4690 Of course. You can send commands to the BTS via cont...@bugs.debian.org (which I've Bcc'd). You can see how to do so at http://bugs.debian.org/ Thanks for all your work on this bug. It really is appreciated. I haven't had much time to take a look at this myself but I appreciate your efforts to fix it. -- Simon [ hug...@earth.li ] *\ 'blitz mais g la productivité \** ** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\ d'une endive :)' #parinux \* ** [ Htag.pl 0.0.24 ] ***\\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#498770: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#498770: xfce4-mpc-plugin: Segfaults on mouseover after song change
Please don't send additional information to -quiet it's useful to see it here. At some point you wrote: It may be because I'm using authentication to another computer rather than local (which one is supposed to be able to do, but I know I didn't have problem before when I was using mpd on the same machine). I can't reproduce this from a remote machine using a password either I'm afraid (I thought it being remote might be the clue we needed). I've put an i386 debug package at: http://the.earth.li/~huggie/xfce4-mpc-plugin-debug/ Can you install that package and then also please install: libglib2.0-0-dbg libgtk2.0-0-dbg libxfce4util4-dbg libxfcegui4-4-dbg xfce4-panel-dbg Then if you restart the panel and send us the trace then hopefully we can start to track this down. Thanks. -- ,--huggie-at-earth-dot-listuff-thing-stuff--DF5CE2B4--. _| Do you think they would have taken me more seriously if I had|_ |worn the grey suit? - Mulder| ` http://www.earth.li/~huggie/ ---' signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#497297: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#497297: gdm starts gnome-settings-manager which block mcs and xfce4 won't start
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:11:26PM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: If you install the xfce task, you can't start xfce4 because gdm depends on gnome-session which pulls in gnome-settings-manager, which block mcs and therefore xfce4 can't start. I didn't get a chance to look at this yet from an xfce side and it looks like noone else has either. Does gdm start gnome-session and gnome-settings-manager in the Xfce session? That sounds like a bug in gdm to be honest but I haven't had any time to actually test any of this. -- Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ Rule six: There is no... rule \** ** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\ six. - Monty Python \* ** [ Htag.pl 0.0.24 ] ***\\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#493407: Sorry, part of this isn't fixed.
reopen 493407 found 493407 3.2-17 thanks Whilst your fix may well fix dash it doesn't solve the issue I reported with set -e scripts. I did dgkg-source -x for each of the lsbs and moved them into 3.2-blah then created a simple test: #!/bin/sh -e echo Importing $1/init-functions . $1/init-functions log_warning_msg Only a warning echo OK! i.e. it should output a warning and then OK! if it's working. The results are: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/lsb]$ ./lsb-test.sh lsb-3.2-15 Importing lsb-3.2-15/init-functions Only a warning OK! [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/lsb]$ ./lsb-test.sh lsb-3.2-16 Importing lsb-3.2-16/init-functions Only a warning (warning). [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/lsb]$ ./lsb-test.sh lsb-3.2-17 Importing lsb-3.2-17/init-functions Only a warning (warning). [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/lsb]$ This is because the functions need to return 0 on success and anything else on failure. This is still going to break my (and other people's) networking on reboot. Chaning log_end_msg to return 0 and not return $retval would fix it I believe. Simon. -- oOoOo CATS. CATS ARE NICE. - Death, Sourcery oOoOo oOoOooOoOo oOoOo oOoOo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#493407: marked as done (lsb-base: bashism in init-functions + kills networking on reboot on systems where /bin/sh = /bin/bash)
Hi Chris, Sorry to be a pain but I'm still not entirely sure this is all fixed now. It fixes the case I saw in /etc/init.d/networking but log_failure_msg still returns a failure code. Is that by design? It didn't use to be the case in -15. If I extend the lsb-test.sh to add: log_success_msg Success log_failure_msg Failure then I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/lsb]$ ./lsb-test.sh lsb-3.2-18 Importing lsb-3.2-18/init-functions Only a warning (warning). Success. Failure failed! [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/lsb]$ ./lsb-test.sh lsb-3.2-15 Importing lsb-3.2-15/init-functions Only a warning Success Failure OK! [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/lsb]$ I think you probably want all three of them to return 0 no matter what was passed unless there was an error producing the message somehow (is that possible?). That way they'll be safe in any script with set -e. You might want to publicise to a wider audience your changelog about not using these functions though if they aren't meant to be used. I hadn't noticed that -17 was ok if the terminal was colour (I was testing under screen so something must have confused it into thinking it wasn't colour capable). Simon. -- Just another wannabie | Did someone say they wanted | Just another fool --+ toast? -- Talkie Toaster+--- This message was brought to you by the letter L and the number 3. htag.pl 0.0.24 -- http://www.earth.li/projectpurple/progs/htag.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#493407: networking initscript no-longer brings up interfaces if /etc/network/options exists due to new upload of lsb
retitle 493407 lsb-base: bashism in init-functions + kills networking on reboot
on systems where /bin/sh = /bin/bash
thanks
Aha, just found this bug. This is actually bad for people using bash as
/bin/sh too with -e set.
Your innocent looking changes to the logging system include:
log_warning_msg () {
-if log_use_fancy_output; then
-YELLOW=`$TPUT setaf 3`
-NORMAL=`$TPUT op`
-/bin/echo -e ${YELLOW}*${NORMAL} $@
-else
-echo $@
+if [ -n ${1:-} ]; then
+log_begin_msg $@
fi
+log_end_msg -1
}
/etc/init.d/netbase is run with:
#!/bin/sh -e
and then does:
process_options() {
[ -e /etc/network/options ] || return 0
log_warning_msg /etc/network/options still exists and it will be IGNORED! R
ead README.Debian of netbase.
}
This finds the file on my system (yes I should have removed it ages ago)
and then that function returns with -1 here and the script exits without
bringing up interfaces breaking unrelated software.
Adding
|| /bin/true
to the end of log_warning_msg line works around this in netbase but what
else has this broken? :(
Simon.
--
Just another wannabie | To infinity and beyond!| Just another fool
--++---
This message was brought to you by the letter R and the number 10.
htag.pl 0.0.24 -- http://www.earth.li/projectpurple/progs/htag.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437454: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#437454: Bug#437454: Bug#437454: fix for Etch still missing
Security team, any news?
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:28:28PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:10:38PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 17:11:04 +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
what is the status of this bug regarding Etch? The Etch version is
affected, too, and the fix should also apply to the Etch version.
I have untested packages for stable at:
http://the.earth.li/~huggie/xfce4-terminal-fix/
If you have an amd64 box you can just install the deb. Otherwise if you
rebuild it from that .dsc/.diff.gz/.orig.tar.gz on your machine and can
let me know that you can reproduce the bug on the old one but not the
new that would be useful.
I need to test it myself tonight.
I can build it myself if I need them, but I don't use xfce4-terminal
from Etch. I just wondered why a security related bug that is fixed for
nearly 2 weeks in Sid is still not fixed in Etch.
Because no one has picked this up and looked into it I guess.
I've tested the packages above in a stable chroot now.
Debdiff is:
Depends: libatk1.0-0 (= 1.12.2), libc6 (= 2.3.5-1),
[-libdbus-1-3,-] {+libdbus-1-3 (= 0.94),+}
libdbus-1-3 is 1.0.2-1 in stable.
libdbus-glib-1-2 (= 0.71),
libexo-0.3-0 (= [-0.3.1.10rc1-1),-] {+0.3.1.12rc2-1),+}
0.3.1.12rc2-1 is current in stable.
libglib2.0-0 (= 2.12.0), libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.8.0),
libstartup-notification0 (= 0.8-1), libvte4 (= 1:0.12.1),
libx11-6, libxfce4util4 (= [-4.3.99.1)-] {+4.3.99.2)+}
4.3.99.2 is in stable.
Version: [-0.2.5.6rc1-2-] {+0.2.5.6rc1-2etch1+}
Security team, the packages above from
http://the.earth.li/~huggie/xfce4-terminal-fix/
are confirmed working and hopefully have the right distribution
(stable-security) and priority (high).
Can I upload them somewhere?
Simon.
--
[ If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried. ]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437454: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#437454: fix for Etch still missing
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: what is the status of this bug regarding Etch? The Etch version is affected, too, and the fix should also apply to the Etch version. I have untested packages for stable at: http://the.earth.li/~huggie/xfce4-terminal-fix/ If you have an amd64 box you can just install the deb. Otherwise if you rebuild it from that .dsc/.diff.gz/.orig.tar.gz on your machine and can let me know that you can reproduce the bug on the old one but not the new that would be useful. I need to test it myself tonight. -- _[EMAIL PROTECTED] -+*+- fou, con et anglais _ (_) No, the radio works. You don't - Basil, Fawlty Towers (_) (_) (_) \______/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#437454: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#437454: Bug#437454: fix for Etch still missing
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:10:38PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 17:11:04 +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
what is the status of this bug regarding Etch? The Etch version is
affected, too, and the fix should also apply to the Etch version.
I have untested packages for stable at:
http://the.earth.li/~huggie/xfce4-terminal-fix/
If you have an amd64 box you can just install the deb. Otherwise if you
rebuild it from that .dsc/.diff.gz/.orig.tar.gz on your machine and can
let me know that you can reproduce the bug on the old one but not the
new that would be useful.
I need to test it myself tonight.
I can build it myself if I need them, but I don't use xfce4-terminal
from Etch. I just wondered why a security related bug that is fixed for
nearly 2 weeks in Sid is still not fixed in Etch.
Because no one has picked this up and looked into it I guess.
I've tested the packages above in a stable chroot now.
Debdiff is:
Depends: libatk1.0-0 (= 1.12.2), libc6 (= 2.3.5-1),
[-libdbus-1-3,-] {+libdbus-1-3 (= 0.94),+}
libdbus-1-3 is 1.0.2-1 in stable.
libdbus-glib-1-2 (= 0.71),
libexo-0.3-0 (= [-0.3.1.10rc1-1),-] {+0.3.1.12rc2-1),+}
0.3.1.12rc2-1 is current in stable.
libglib2.0-0 (= 2.12.0), libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.8.0),
libstartup-notification0 (= 0.8-1), libvte4 (= 1:0.12.1),
libx11-6, libxfce4util4 (= [-4.3.99.1)-] {+4.3.99.2)+}
4.3.99.2 is in stable.
Version: [-0.2.5.6rc1-2-] {+0.2.5.6rc1-2etch1+}
Security team, the packages above from
http://the.earth.li/~huggie/xfce4-terminal-fix/
are confirmed working and hopefully have the right distribution
(stable-security) and priority (high).
Can I upload them somewhere?
--
_[EMAIL PROTECTED] -+*+- fou, con et anglais _
(_) benj[w0rK] naoko: ca marche parfaitement ... quand on a (_)
(_) une carte QUI FONCTIONNE ! (_)
\___benj[w0rK] alors camembert :) ___/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#436732: Segfaults when config file points to non-existant files
Package: ufraw Severity: grave Version: 0.11-2 I set up ufraw with a few preferred directories and so on. Then I ran out of space on /home/huggie and moved things elsewhere. ufraw started segfaulting when trying to get the colour profile I'd defined. i.e. if I have: InputProfile Current='yes'Nkx_D80_5_1691_06_000_434 File/home/huggie/Photos/Nkx_D80_5_1691_06_000_434.icm/File ProductNameNikon D80 for NEF Mode5 v2.0.0.3000/ProductName /InputProfile and then that file doesn't exist I get: open(/home/huggie/Photos/Nkx_D80_5_1691_06_000_434.icm, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ Process 1926 detached If I change the .ufrawrc to point to /data/Photos/blah where the file now is it all works. Ideally ufraw should error nicely in this case. Simon. -- oOoOo I'm Beverly..., I'm Geordi..., We are Hugh... oOoOo oOoOooOoOo oOoOo oOoOo htag.pl 0.0.22 ::: http://www.earth.li/~huggie/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#431706: statoverride issue
found 431706 0.6.18-1 thanks I first corrected the user - passwd in the getent call but that wasn't enough. I think this is now failing to upgrade because of the dpkg-statoverride hence the No override found error above. If I add a || true on the dpkg-statoverride line then it all works as expected. Simon. -- oOoOo A l'attaque par Junon Aoh! Choquant. Ce ne sont pas oOoOo oOoOo des gentils hommes -- Astérix chez les Bretons. oOoOo oOoOo oOoOo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#422455: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#422455: I was able to reproduce this
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:18:22AM -0600, Andrew Robinson wrote: I was able to reproduce this, but I am not sure if I can do it consistently. It happened if I performed a reboot from inside of an xterm without shutting xfce down properly (so I didn't use the xfce logout/shutdown/reboot functionality). The next time I reboot xfwm4 did not start automatically. Going into the desktop settings, I had to re-check the Allow Xfce to manage the desktop. Are you absolutely sure you mean xfwm4 here and not say xfdesktop4 which manages the desktop and runs the menu? i.e. were you just missing window decorations? I think your case might be unrelated to the original problem. Simon. -- [ If at first you don't succeed, skydiving isn't for you. ] Black Cat Networks. http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#422455: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#422455: xfce4: xfwm4 doesn't start automatically
tags 422455 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 06:01:43AM +0200, Gaetano Guerriero wrote: When I start xfce4, xfwm4 doesn't start with it, and I am left with no window manager ( no window borders, unmovable windows ). If I manually start xfwm4 in a terminal within xfce4, the problem is corrected. xfwm4 has always started for me. Was this the first time that you had installed xfce4 that xfwm4 didn't start? If not did you upgrade from a previous version of xfce4/xfwm4? Which? How did you start it? (gdm, kdm, xdm or something like startx etc) Can you give me the results of: ls -l /etc/alternatives/x-session-manager If you have a .config/xfce4-session/xfce4-session.rc please send it to this bug report likewise please send your /etc/xdg/xfce4-session/xfce4-session.rc Is it possible that somehow you managed to save the session without the window manager running? Is there anything strange about your system that you should tell us? Simon. -- * Even if it does matter, does it matter that it matters? - * | Marvin| * * Brought to you by the letter J and the number 26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#420759: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#420759: orageclock plugin leaks memory
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:50:07PM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote: Your patch seems to work fine. Builds and runs w/ no problems. After about 24 hours, memory use (vsize) has remained around 1MB. Hmm, do I really need to keep it running that long to notice? I ran it for a short period in a stable chroot (the old version) and didn't notice any change in memory usage in ps or top. I can see from the code that the bug should exist but I'm wondering about your config. Do you have anything special in .config/xfce4/orage/oragerc ? -- _[EMAIL PROTECTED] -+*+- fou, con et anglais _ (_) I'm gonna eat you, little fishy! - The Cat (_) (_) (_) \______/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#420759: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#420759: orageclock plugin leaks memory
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 09:28:42AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:50:07PM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
Your patch seems to work fine. Builds and runs w/ no problems. After
about 24 hours, memory use (vsize) has remained around 1MB.
Hmm, do I really need to keep it running that long to notice?
Never mind, got it :)
With the current version in etch:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ date ps aux|grep orage\\clock
Sat Apr 28 08:32:59 UTC 2007
huggie 19601 0.0 0.4 61184 8432 tty1 S08:31 0:00
/usr/lib/orage/xfce4/panel-plugins/orageclock socket_id 10485825 name
orageclock id 11777089370 display_name Orage Clock size 36 screen_position 11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ date ps aux|grep orage\\clock
Sat Apr 28 09:23:45 UTC 2007
huggie 19601 0.0 0.4 62208 9452 tty1 S08:31 0:00
/usr/lib/orage/xfce4/panel-plugins/orageclock socket_id 10485825 name
orageclock id 11777089370 display_name Orage Clock size 36 screen_position 11
So 61184 - 62208 in 50 minutes.
(nothing else happened on the machine in the mean time)
With my patched version:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ date ps aux|grep orage\\clock
Sat Apr 28 10:53:57 UTC 2007
huggie6388 0.2 0.4 61188 8428 tty1 S10:53 0:00
/usr/lib/orage/xfce4/panel-plugins/orageclock socket_id 12582977 name
orageclock id 11777575670 display_name Orage Clock size 36 screen_position 11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ date ps aux|grep orage\\clock
Sat Apr 28 13:31:16 UTC 2007
huggie6388 0.0 0.4 61188 8428 tty1 S10:53 0:00
/usr/lib/orage/xfce4/panel-plugins/orageclock socket_id 12582977 name
orageclock id 11777575670 display_name Orage Clock size 36 screen_position 11
61188 - 61188
For reference the full diff in this version is (from debdiff):
diff -u orage-4.3.99.1/debian/changelog orage-4.3.99.1/debian/changelog
--- orage-4.3.99.1/debian/changelog
+++ orage-4.3.99.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+orage (4.3.99.1-2) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix memory leak due to not freeing values returned from
+g_locale_from_utf8 (thanks Jason Kraftcheck)closes: #420759
+
+ -- Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:31:34 +0100
+
orage (4.3.99.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- orage-4.3.99.1.orig/panel-plugin/orageclock.c
+++ orage-4.3.99.1/panel-plugin/orageclock.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
{
char date_s[255];
char *utf8date = NULL;
+char *tmp;
/* TRANSLATORS: Use format characters from strftime(3)
* to get the proper string for your locale.
@@ -59,9 +60,11 @@
* %Y : four digit year
* %V : ISO week number
*/
+tmp = g_locale_from_utf8( _(%A %d %B %Y/%V), -1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
strftime(date_s, 255
-, g_locale_from_utf8( _(%A %d %B %Y/%V), -1, NULL, NULL, NULL)
+, tmp
, clock-now);
+g_free(tmp);
/* Conversion to utf8 */
if (!g_utf8_validate(date_s, -1, NULL)) {
@@ -89,6 +92,7 @@
int i;
static gint mday = -1;
ClockLine *line;
+char *tmp;
time(t);
localtime_r(t, clock-now);
@@ -96,9 +100,11 @@
for (i = 0; i OC_MAX_LINES; i++) {
line = clock-line[i];
if (line-show) {
+tmp = g_locale_from_utf8(line-data-str, -1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
strftime(time_s, sizeof(time_s)
-, g_locale_from_utf8(line-data-str, -1, NULL, NULL, NULL)
+, tmp
, clock-now);
+g_free(tmp);
if (!g_utf8_validate(time_s, -1, NULL)) {
utf8time_s = g_locale_to_utf8(time_s, -1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (utf8time_s) {
I'll go away and talk to debian-release about including it in the next
point release of stable.
For other people experiencing this but I've put the debs at:
http://the.earth.li/~huggie/etch-orage-fix/
Simon.
--
oOoOo Go not unto the Usenet for advice, for you will be toldoOoOo
oOoOo both yea and nay (and quite a few things that just have oOoOo
oOoOo nothing at all to do with the question) oOoOo
htag.pl 0.0.22 ::: http://www.earth.li/~huggie/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#420872: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#420872: xfdesktop4: segfaults in libc.so.6
tags 420872 = confirmed thanks On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:26:59AM +0200, David Paleino wrote: Simon Huggins ha scritto: Can you also send us /etc/xdg/xfce4/desktop/menudefs.hook from before any of the tests below please. Here you find attached the files. [..] Maybe you have a slight idea of what's happening here now (with the LANG=C fix)... ;-) Ah, balls. Yes I can reproduce this now. I'm just playing with the source to see if I can get a proper trace to track it down. Simon. -- [ RobL mint aeros will fix everything. ] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#420872: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#420872: xfdesktop4: segfaults in libc.so.6
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:41:51AM +0200, David Paleino wrote: Simon Huggins ha scritto: Ah, balls. Yes I can reproduce this now. I'm just playing with the source to see if I can get a proper trace to track it down. Thanks for working on this. I downloaded the source (apt-get source), and I'm playing with it as well. I'll report here if I have something. Right, for some strange reason for the Italian (it) locale both menu.xml.it and xfce-registered-categories.xml.it have two copies of the content in each file Can you please remove both of these extra copies i.e. delete from the second ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? down to the end of the file. They are in /etc/xdg/xfce4/desktop/menu.xml.it and /etc/xdg/xfce4/desktop/xfce-registered-categories.xml.it. It seems to be the xfce-registered-categories one that is killing it for me. If you can confirm that this fixes it for you I'll upload a fix shortly and file a bug with upstream too as obviously it shouldn't die on random input. You may need to clear out .cache/xfce4/desktop/* before you test it. Let me know. -- Simon Huggins \ blitz c'est à coup de petits Ko qu'on fait les gros \ lags :) http://www.earth.li/~huggie/htag.pl 0.0.22 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#420759: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#420759: orageclock plugin leaks memory
fixed 420759 4.4.1-1
tags 420759 patch
thanks
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:27:41AM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
orageclock panel plugin in Debian stable leaks memory every time
it updates the time.
--- orage-4.3.99.1/panel-plugin/orageclock.c 2006-09-02 10:55:11.0
-0500
+++ orage-mod/panel-plugin/orageclock.c 2007-04-18 15:59:20.0
-0500
@@ -96,9 +96,9 @@
for (i = 0; i OC_MAX_LINES; i++) {
line = clock-line[i];
if (line-show) {
-strftime(time_s, sizeof(time_s)
-, g_locale_from_utf8(line-data-str, -1, NULL, NULL,
NULL)
-, clock-now);
+gchar* locstr = g_locale_from_utf8(line-data-str, -1, NULL,
NULL, NULL);
+strftime(time_s, sizeof(time_s), locstr, clock-now);
+g_free(locstr);
if (!g_utf8_validate(time_s, -1, NULL)) {
utf8time_s = g_locale_to_utf8(time_s, -1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (utf8time_s) {
Upstream fixed this back in October in SVN. We'll have to prepare a
version for proposed-updates I guess.
There is another use of g_locale_from_utf8 in a similarly bogus way just
before.
I've added this one in and used char *s as that's what future versions
of orage have used.
I end up with:
--- orage-4.3.99.1/panel-plugin/orageclock.c2006-09-02 16:55:11.0
+0100
+++ orage-4.3.99.1-mod/panel-plugin/orageclock.c2007-04-26
15:30:13.0 +0100
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
{
char date_s[255];
char *utf8date = NULL;
+char *tmp;
/* TRANSLATORS: Use format characters from strftime(3)
* to get the proper string for your locale.
@@ -59,9 +60,11 @@
* %Y : four digit year
* %V : ISO week number
*/
+tmp = g_locale_from_utf8( _(%A %d %B %Y/%V), -1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
strftime(date_s, 255
-, g_locale_from_utf8( _(%A %d %B %Y/%V), -1, NULL, NULL, NULL)
+, tmp
, clock-now);
+g_free(tmp);
/* Conversion to utf8 */
if (!g_utf8_validate(date_s, -1, NULL)) {
@@ -89,6 +92,7 @@
int i;
static gint mday = -1;
ClockLine *line;
+char *tmp;
time(t);
localtime_r(t, clock-now);
@@ -96,9 +100,11 @@
for (i = 0; i OC_MAX_LINES; i++) {
line = clock-line[i];
if (line-show) {
+tmp = g_locale_from_utf8(line-data-str, -1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
strftime(time_s, sizeof(time_s)
-, g_locale_from_utf8(line-data-str, -1, NULL, NULL, NULL)
+, tmp
, clock-now);
+g_free(tmp);
if (!g_utf8_validate(time_s, -1, NULL)) {
utf8time_s = g_locale_to_utf8(time_s, -1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (utf8time_s) {
Does that look sane to you?
It builds at least. I need to create a stable chroot and a stable
pbuilder environment to properly test it yet but if you could test it as
well that would help.
Simon
--
... I know what I wrote Mulder. I also know that the laws of physics would
permit the theoretical possibility of time travel but the limits of
human endurance would prevent such a trip from ever happening
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#420872: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#420872: xfdesktop4: segfaults in libc.so.6
tags 420872 moreinfo help thanks On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:24:09AM +0200, David Paleino wrote: Xfdesktop just segfaults. Here is a trace from gdb: [..] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1211976000 (LWP 6671)] 0xb7cf79d0 in ?? () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) Please contact me if you need further information. If you install libc6-dbg does that give you more information with the backtrace in gdb? If you mv .config/xfce4 elsewhere briefly and then try to start xfdesktop4 does it die in a similar way? We've not seen anyone else report it dying in this way yet. Simon. -- * You speak German? Oh, German! I thought there was something * | wrong with you. Of course, the Germans - Basil, Fawlty Towers | * * Brought to you by the letter Z and the number 26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#420872: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#420872: xfdesktop4: segfaults in libc.so.6
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:38:41PM +0200, David Paleino wrote: I've recompiled the xfdesktop4 package, after having added the --enable-debug option at the ./configure script. gdb tells the same things as before, the only news is that xfdesktop writes lots of things in the console. But, IMHO, they're totally useless to the problem: I'm attaching the log here (`xfdesktop log4`) Can you also send us /etc/xdg/xfce4/desktop/menudefs.hook from before any of the tests below please. Oh, I know we talked about moving .config/xfce4 out of the way earlier but I didn't mention .cache/xfce4 out of the way too and trying it after that then moving it back. Can you try: LANG=C xfdesktop and see if that happens to fix it? Also try as root: LANG=C update-menus and then try running it and see if that fixes it (if it doesn't you'll want to run update-menus without the LANG=C before it afterwards to reset your menu). Do you have menu installed? Can you try removing the menu package, dpkg --purge xfdesktop4 and then installing xfdesktop4 again too? See if it works in that configuration. If it does, try installing menu again and see if it works then. I don't quite know what's happening here but if you can try some of these ideas we might get closer. I am somewhat clutching at straws here though :( Simon. -- Black Cat Networks-( Ah. So you're a waffle man! - )- UK domain, email and web hosting -( Talkie Toaster)- http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk -( )- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#419981: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#419981: xfce4-panel: Cannot be installed on Sid
severity 419981 normal thanks On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:16:34AM +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: When I attempt to install it, there is a message about unmet dependencies: Welcome to unstable! The following packages have unmet dependencies. xfce4-panel: Depends: libxfcegui4-4 (= 4.3.99.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libexo-0.3-0 (= 0.3.1.12rc2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: mousepad but it is not going to be installed However, the list below shows that correct versions of these packages are installed. Yes, but the libs no longer exist in the archive at that version so I think apt is getting a little confused. Basically be patient. i386 hasn't built the whole of the new xfce 4.4.1 yet. You can track its status at: http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?email=pkg-xfce-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.orgpackages=arches= Please consider running testing if you want to always have satisfied dependencies or are unsure why this happens. Simon. -- oOoOo Do they teach lawyers to apologise, because you suck at oOoOo oOoOo it? -- Erin Brockovich. oOoOo oOoOo oOoOo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#389414: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#389414: thunar_0.4.0rc1-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing define
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:28:29AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thunar-vfs-io-local-xfer.c:206: error: 'POSIX_MADV_SEQUENTIAL' undeclared (first use in this function) On hppa, bits/mman.h doesn't declare this. #381294 against libc6-dev is a similar bug for mips (and arm) and indeed mips and arm are fixed upstream: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-ports/2006-05/msg5.html As in fact is hppa: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/bits/mman.h?rev=1.6content-type=text/plaincvsroot=glibc I suspect this is too late to go into glibc for etch though. I guess we'll have to patch thunar locally to work around this for hppa which sucks somewhat but hey. Lamont, any other hppa porters, please chase the libc guys about this. Simon. -- oOoOo 'blitz pasque toutes les erreurs possible je crois que oOoOo oOoOoj'y ai eu droit :)' #parinuxoOoOo oOoOo oOoOo htag.pl 0.0.22 ::: http://www.earth.li/~huggie/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#375677: apt-proxy entirely broken
Chris apparently has new code but it's not in unstable yet. Given apt-proxy is entirely broken it's perhaps worth mentioning that apt-cacher does a similar job but it works in today's unstable. I installed it today and once I added a sane path_map it worked fine and in a similar way to apt-proxy. Simon. -- Black Cat Networks-( Rule six: There is no... rule )- UK domain, email and web hosting -(six. - Monty Python )- http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk -( )- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376135: closed by Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#376135: xfce4-systray: uninstallable in sid)
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:01:23PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 06:33:57AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 14:44 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: xfce4-systray Version: 4.2.3-1 Severity: serious Hello Debian Xfce Maintainers, xfce4-systray is uninstallable in sid: xfce4-systray: Depends: libxfce4util-1 (= 4.2.0) xfce4-systray doesnt need to be installed anymore. It has been replaced by xfce4-panel. xfce4-systray will be removed from unstable, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=37 Why not keep this bug open until the package is actually removed ? At least it let people know about the problem and the fix. If they didn't get the hint from the Conflicts:/Replaces: on xfce4-panel is there really much hope that they'll check bugs.d.o ? ;) I'm not really bothered either way to be honest. I think a better thing would be for the BTS to report ftp.d.o bugs on the package pages as well and will file a bug for that. Can I ask why you wanted it installed or how you got into a situation where your apt frontend tried to install it? Simon. -- UK based domain, email and web hosting ***/ And what have they ever /* http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ **/ given us in return? The /** [EMAIL PROTECTED] */ aqueduct? /*** Black Cat Networks / / -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#373232: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#373232: xfce4-showdesktop-plugin: FTBFS: No package 'xfce4-panel-1.0' found
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 08:45:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Your package is failing to build with the following error: This has been moved into xfce4-panel now and we've even filed for removal. See #370005 Please don't rebuild random packages just for the fun of it and then not check removal requests. Thanks. -- Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ Her name is Bambi? - Scully \** ** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\\* ** [ Htag.pl 0.0.22 ] ***\\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372871: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#372871: xfce4-notes-plugin - FTBFS: Package xfce4-panel-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path
tags 372871 +upstream retitle 372871 FTBFS on new panel merge 372871 370111 thanks On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:51:55AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of xfce4-notes-plugin_0.10.0-2+b1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: autotools-dev, cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1), libgtk2.0-dev, libxfcegui4-dev, xfce4-panel-dev, libxml2-dev, libtool, automake1.8, autoconf [...] checking for xfce4-panel-1.0 = 4.1.90... Package xfce4-panel-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `xfce4-panel-1.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'xfce4-panel-1.0' found configure: error: Library requirements (xfce4-panel-1.0 = 4.1.90) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060612-1049 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Indeed. We know about this. We'll either ask for its removal or someone will port the plugin to the new panel. A FTBFS bug was already filed. Simon. -- [ Everybody, everybody's dead, everybody's dead Dave. - Holly] Black Cat Networks. http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372082: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#372082: xfwm4: many (most?) keybindings broken
tags 372082 +unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:35:40AM -0600, Bert wrote: Ctl+Alt+arrow_keys doesn't cycle through workspaces KP_Del (not Alt_Del) deletes workspace KP_Ins (not alt_Ins) adds workspace (and so on) and to me, the most serious breakage is from Tab (not Alt_Tab) brings up a cycle windows window which won't let me choose any window. For instance, while working in a terminal window, using Tab for tab completion completely destroys usability of system, requireing a restart of X, since, although the cycle windows window comes up, I am unable to get anything else to happen. Repeated tabs cycles through the choices, but none can be chosen. Tab is the only key that does anything, and this is only to move the choice of windows through the chooser dialog box. X can be restarted with Ctl+Alt+Backspace. In my use of the X window system I find Tab to be a key that I use often in many applications. It is very annoying (to the point of making many apps unusable) to have the system rendered useless by the use of this key, and to necessitate a restart of X because of the use of this habitually used key. Hmm, we don't see this. Do you have some odd custom theme? What happens if you move any keythemerc file from .themes ? (and send us a copy if you find one which breaks it). What happens if you run xfce-settings-show and look at the window manager key settings? Can you tell us what's there and try choosing the default keytheme? Are you running any other apps which might be grabbing keys? Do you have any errors in .xsession-errors? Let us know. Simon. -- Just another wannabie | Le doute est le commencement | Just another fool --+ de la sagesse. +--- This message was brought to you by the letter O and the number 25. htag.pl 0.0.22 -- http://www.earth.li/projectpurple/progs/htag.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372082: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#372082: xfwm4: many (most?) keybindings broken
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:53:42AM -0600, Bert Riding wrote: On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:44:31 +0100 Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happens if you run xfce-settings-show and look at the window manager key settings? Can you tell us what's there and try choosing the default keytheme? Strangely xfce-settings-show is not found. I can run the settings dialog from the root menu. The Default keybindings is the only one that is shown. If I try to create a new one, the directory appears in .themes but the keybinding won't change. It always reverts to what's in Default. No, that's cos I misspelt it *sigh* It's xfce-setting-show but not important now. I'm surprised you can't create a new theme though. On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:06:01AM -0600, Bert Riding wrote: I just moved .config and .themes out of the way and restarted xfce4. The normal behavior of Tab and Ctl+Alt+left-right have returned. I'll start reconfiguring xfce as I like it and see if anything in particular breaks this. I can tar up the old .themes and .config if you like and send it to you. Yes, we'd love to see a tar of the old settings so we can try to break it ourselves and report it upstream. Simon -- ... forc3 zsh je trouve ke tu passes plus de temps a faire la conf k'a l'utiliser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370111: FTBFS with new xfce4-panel pending new upstream version
Package: xfce4-notes-plugin Version: 0.10.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream This plugin no longer builds against the new 4.4 panel. At some point we hope upstream will port it to the new panel or an enthusiastic user might but until then this bug is here to record this and make sure we don't release etch with it. -- Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ Zelfs een blinde kip vindt wel eens \** ** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\een korrel \* ** [ Htag.pl 0.0.22 ] ***\\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370114: FTBFS with new xfce4-panel pending new upstream version
Package: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin Version: 0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream This plugin no longer builds against the new 4.4 panel. At some point we hope upstream will port it to the new panel or an enthusiastic user might but until then this bug is here to record this and make sure we don't release etch with it. -- Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ Zelfs een blinde kip vindt wel eens \** ** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\een korrel \* ** [ Htag.pl 0.0.22 ] ***\\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370113: FTBFS with new xfce4-panel pending new upstream version
Package: xfce4-datetime-plugin Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream This plugin no longer builds against the new 4.4 panel. At some point we hope upstream will port it to the new panel or an enthusiastic user might but until then this bug is here to record this and make sure we don't release etch with it. -- Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ Zelfs een blinde kip vindt wel eens \** ** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\een korrel \* ** [ Htag.pl 0.0.22 ] ***\\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369837: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#369837: FTBFS: #error Only libxfce4util/libxfce4util.h can be included directly
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:06:52PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: /usr/include/xfce4/libxfce4util/i18n.h:24:2: error: #error Only libxfce4util/libxfce4util.h can be included directly, this file may disappear or change contents Again this is probably going to be removed in favour of thunar but we're going to discuss this first. Simon. -- Oops, yes, we now return you to your regularly scheduled kgcc wars. -- Malcolm Beattie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369838: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#369838: FTBFS: #error Only libxfce4util/libxfce4util.h can be included directly
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:06:56PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: In file included from support.c:16: /usr/include/xfce4/libxfce4util/i18n.h:24:2: error: #error Only libxfce4util/libxfce4util.h can be included directly, this file may disappear or change contents Yeah sorry this package is to be removed. I've just filed the removal request as 370004. Thanks for the report though. -- _[EMAIL PROTECTED] -+*+- fou, con et anglais _ (_) I'm Beverly..., I'm Geordi..., We are Hugh... (_) (_) (_) \______/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#361365: Your xfce4-mixer bug
Firstly, I'm really sorry that you filed this bug 52 days ago. One of the problems with using a list as a Maintainer is that this got held for moderation (I assume or rejected out right) because of the size of the attachments. And the list admin is AWOL and hasn't been doing work on xfce for a while. Sorry, we'll get this sorted out. None of us have seen this behaviour in 4.2.3.2 though and we've not seen other reports. Does alsa work correctly on your system? e.g. can you try alsamixer? Simon. -- UK based domain, email and web hosting ***/To infinity and beyond! /* http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ **/ /** [EMAIL PROTECTED] */ /*** Black Cat Networks / / -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362918: Trivial patch
'ello Matthias On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 02:26:46AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Simon Huggins writes: I've built the packages this way and it works fine for me to run apt-proxy with it on amd64. I'd like to NMU with this if you don't have time to fix it but I want to check with you first. please go ahead and consider making this change in the other twisted-* packages as well. Here's the complete NMU diff: diff -urN orig/twisted-runner-0.1.0/debian/changelog new/twisted-runner-0.1.0/debian/changelog --- orig/twisted-runner-0.1.0/debian/changelog 2006-05-14 18:48:21.0 +0100 +++ new/twisted-runner-0.1.0/debian/changelog 2006-05-15 10:38:29.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +twisted-runner (0.1.0-3.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer Upload (with permission). + * Build-Depend on -twisted-core instead of -twisted (closes: #362918). + + -- Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 15 May 2006 10:20:25 +0100 + twisted-runner (0.1.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * Depend on -core packages instead of -twisted packages (closes: #351210). diff -urN orig/twisted-runner-0.1.0/debian/control new/twisted-runner-0.1.0/debian/control --- orig/twisted-runner-0.1.0/debian/control2006-05-14 18:48:21.0 +0100 +++ new/twisted-runner-0.1.0/debian/control 2006-05-14 18:07:34.0 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: python Priority: optional Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.2), python2.4-dev, python2.3-dev, python2.4-twisted (= 2.0.1), python2.3-twisted (= 2.0.1), python, patch +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.2), python2.4-dev, python2.3-dev, python2.4-twisted-core (= 2.0.1), python2.3-twisted-core (= 2.0.1), python, patch Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: python-twisted-runner -- Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ That's why we like you, Mulder; \** ** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\ your ideas are weirder than ours. - \* ** [ Htag.pl 0.0.22 ] ***\ Byers \ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347745: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#347745: xfmedia - FTBFS: build-depends against removed package
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:38:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: However the following packages replace it: libdbus-1-dev E: Package dbus-1-dev has no installation candidate dbus-1-dev was removed from the archive. Yeah we have patches for new dbus in SVN but couldn't upload as we'd just FTBFS on the xine packages that were depending on xlibs-dev. We'll upload shortly though, never fear :) -- _[EMAIL PROTECTED] -+*+- fou, con et anglais _ (_) Keybuk grr, where's Kinnison when you need a guinea pig? (_) (_) (_) \______/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344523: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
severity 344523 normal thanks On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:42:27PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: xfmedia depends (and build-depends) on libexo-0.3-0, but that package is not in Debian. The Debian package is called libex0.3-0. Thus xfmedia is uninstallable in unstable. The new exo package is in NEW. Once it trickles through NEW it'll all work out. Thanks for your concern. Simon. -- * But what if Sarris survives? - Mathesar * | Oh, I don't think so. I gave him both barrels. - Jason| * Galaxy Quest. * Brought to you by the letter Z and the number 20 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344524: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
severity 344524 normal thanks On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:44:28PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: xfce4-terminal depends on libexo-0.3-0, which is the wrong package name for libexo in Debian. The package is named libexo0.3-0 (without the 2nd dash). Thus xfce4-terminal is uninstallable. The new exo package is in NEW. Once it trickles through NEW it'll all work out. Thanks for your concern. -- --( A lie, Mr. Mulder, is most convincingly hidden )-- --(between two truths - Deep Throat )-- Simon ( ) Nomis Htag.pl 0.0.22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315327: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#315327: xfce4-mcs-manager: don't launch the xfce-mcs-manager
severity 315327 important retitle 315327 Don't die when .config is not a directory thanks On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:57:49PM +0200, Cyril Mougel wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote: Cyril Mougel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (22/06/2005): (xfce-mcs-manager:5371): libxfce4util-WARNING **: Invalid XDG_CONFIG_HOME directory `/home/shingara/.config', program may behave incorrectly. ** (xfce-mcs-manager:5371): CRITICAL **: backdrop_settings.c: Unable to migrate settings/backdrop.xml to new location (error opening target file for writing) zsh: segmentation fault xfce-mcs-manager It shouldn't segfault certainly but I don't agree that this is RC. since .config is a file in the present case, and not a directory, it causes different troubles as mentionned above. I then suggest that: * check the type of files with a `test`-like function: regular files, symlinks, directory... * be more explicit in the second message. Example: tell the (full) location of the target file, which could help finding out the problem. And indicate the error number/description could help too (then no more use playing with strace ;-)). I found with Cyril Brulebois where the problem was. In fact my file .config is my kernel config. This name is the default name of a kernel config. Since it's a hidden file, it can easily be forgotten in the home directory. I moved this file and my problem was then closed, a directory .config/ made with the xfce file's configuration. This problem can be frequent, and I agree with Cyril Brulebois's proposition. I'll forward this upstream later today. Thanks for the report. Simon -- ... debian-legal consensus is worth approximately all of the lint currently residing in my belly button. -- Brian Nelson signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#309145: libxfcegui4-dev: Should depend on libstartup-notification0-dev.
tags 309145 pending thanks On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:54:47PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.la references the /usr/lib/libstartup-notification-1.la file (atleast on i386) and libxfcegui4-dev does not have a dependency on libstartup-notification0-dev which provides it. This means that packages using libtool linking against libxfcegui4 will try to use that file and fail to build. You should add a dependency on libstartup-notification0-dev. PS: It doesn't seem to be linked against libstartup-notification on atleast amd64, didn't check the other arches. Maybe it should instead be rebuild without it. Or maybe it's a missing build dependency for libxfcegui4 too? No, it should be a build dependency here too. I've fixed this in SVN too. Thanks for this report. Simon. -- UK based domain, email and web hosting ***/ Just wait. My crystal ball /* http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ **/ is infallible. -- Linus /** [EMAIL PROTECTED] */ /*** Black Cat Networks / / -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309144: Bug#309180: xfce4-appfinder: FTBFS: xfce-appmenuitem.h:72: error: syntax error before '*' token
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 01:05:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 11:46:49AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Please add a versioned dependency from libxfcegui4-dev to libxfce4util-dev to get the correct version. Thanks for finding that. I think this is what caused 309144 for you as well. If libxfcegui4 is linked to libxfce4util, dh_shlibdeps should make sure it's pulling in the correct version, so I suspect libxfce4util isn't properly declaring the version requirement. Please take a look at dh_makeshlibs and the -V option. Yes, that's a cunning plan. I've put a = 4.2.0 shlibs in libxfce4util-1. Thanks for all your help today. -- --( RobL mint aeros will fix everything. )-- --( )-- Simon ( ) Nomis Htag.pl 0.0.22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
