Bug#1064920: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures

2024-04-24 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Status update: the previous pull request would create version
2.0.20+debian-2 but it only includes the fix for armhf. i386 needs to
be fixed as well
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=rshim-user-space=i386
. I will make another merge request to include the fix for i386. -tai

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 8:00 PM Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)  
wrote:
>
> I created a pull request to fix the build issue. Please review
> https://salsa.debian.org/bluefield-team/rshim-user-space/-/merge_requests/11
> -tai
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 7:27 PM dann frazier  wrote:
> >
> > Source: rshim-user-space
> > Version: 2.0.12+debian-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the 
> > past)
> >
> > The switch to fuse3 appears to have introduced a build issue for 32-bit
> > architectures such as armhf:
> >
> > From 
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rshim-user-space=armhf=2.0.20%2Bdebian-1=1709056732=0
> >  :
> >
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..  -Wall -DHAVE_RSHIM_NET 
> > -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0  -DHAVE_RSHIM_USB 
> > -I/usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf  -DHAVE_RSHIM_PCIE -I/usr/include/fuse3  
> > -DHAVE_RSHIM_FUSE -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DFUSE_USE_VERSION=30 
> > -DDEFAULT_RSHIM_CONFIG_FILE='"/etc/rshim.conf"'  -g -O2 
> > -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> > -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o 
> > rshim-rshim_fuse.o `test -f 'rshim_fuse.c' || echo './'`rshim_fuse.c
> > In file included from /usr/include/fuse3/fuse_lowlevel.h:25,
> >  from /usr/include/fuse3/cuse_lowlevel.h:19,
> >  from rshim_fuse.c:23:
> > /usr/include/fuse3/fuse_common.h:928:1: error: static assertion failed: 
> > "fuse: off_t must be 64bit"
> >   928 | _Static_assert(sizeof(off_t) == 8, "fuse: off_t must be 64bit");
> >   | ^~
> > rshim_pcie.c: In function ‘rshim_pcie_mmap_vfio’:
> > rshim_pcie.c:52:37: warning: overflow in conversion from ‘long long 
> > unsigned int’ to ‘__off_t’ {aka ‘long int’} changes value from 
> > ‘7696581394436’ to ‘4’ [-Woverflow]
> >52 | #define VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(x) ((uint64_t) x << 40ULL)
> >   | ^
> > rshim_pcie.c:634:18: note: in expansion of macro ‘VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR’
> >   634 |  VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(VFIO_PCI_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX) 
> > +
> >   |  ^~~~
> > rshim_pcie.c:52:37: warning: overflow in conversion from ‘long long 
> > unsigned int’ to ‘__off_t’ {aka ‘long int’} changes value from 
> > ‘7696581394436’ to ‘4’ [-Woverflow]
> >52 | #define VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(x) ((uint64_t) x << 40ULL)
> >   | ^
> > rshim_pcie.c:643:19: note: in expansion of macro ‘VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR’
> >   643 |   
> > VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(VFIO_PCI_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX) +
> >   |   ^~~~
> > rshim_fuse.c: In function ‘rshim_fuse_misc_read’:
> > rshim_fuse.c:713:36: warning: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long 
> > int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int’} 
> > [-Wformat=]
> >   713 |   n = snprintf(p, len, "%-16s%ld(s)\n", "UP_TIME", 
> > value/BF3_REF_CLK_IN_HZ);
> >   |  ~~^
> >   ||
> >   |long int
> >   |  %lld
> > rshim_fuse.c: In function ‘rshim_fuse_misc_write’:
> > rshim_fuse.c:954:25: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long 
> > unsigned int *’, but argument 3 has type ‘uint64_t *’ {aka ‘long long 
> > unsigned int *’} [-Wformat=]
> >   954 | if (sscanf(p, " 0x%lx", ) != 1)
> >   |   ~~^   ~~
> >   | |   |
> >   | |   uint64_t * {aka long long unsigned int 
> > *}
> >   | long unsigned int *
> >   |   %llx
> > make[3]: *** [Makefile:524: rshim-rshim_fuse.o] Error 1
> >
> >
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: trixie/sid
> >   APT prefers unstable-debug
> >   APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), 
> > (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
> > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> > Foreign Architectures: i386
> >
> > Kernel: Linux 6.6.15-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
> > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
> > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE 
> > not set
> > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
> > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> > LSM: AppArmor: enabled



Bug#1064920: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures

2024-04-22 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
I created a pull request to fix the build issue. Please review
https://salsa.debian.org/bluefield-team/rshim-user-space/-/merge_requests/11
-tai

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 7:27 PM dann frazier  wrote:
>
> Source: rshim-user-space
> Version: 2.0.12+debian-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> The switch to fuse3 appears to have introduced a build issue for 32-bit
> architectures such as armhf:
>
> From 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rshim-user-space=armhf=2.0.20%2Bdebian-1=1709056732=0
>  :
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..  -Wall -DHAVE_RSHIM_NET 
> -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0  -DHAVE_RSHIM_USB 
> -I/usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf  -DHAVE_RSHIM_PCIE -I/usr/include/fuse3  
> -DHAVE_RSHIM_FUSE -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DFUSE_USE_VERSION=30 
> -DDEFAULT_RSHIM_CONFIG_FILE='"/etc/rshim.conf"'  -g -O2 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o 
> rshim-rshim_fuse.o `test -f 'rshim_fuse.c' || echo './'`rshim_fuse.c
> In file included from /usr/include/fuse3/fuse_lowlevel.h:25,
>  from /usr/include/fuse3/cuse_lowlevel.h:19,
>  from rshim_fuse.c:23:
> /usr/include/fuse3/fuse_common.h:928:1: error: static assertion failed: 
> "fuse: off_t must be 64bit"
>   928 | _Static_assert(sizeof(off_t) == 8, "fuse: off_t must be 64bit");
>   | ^~
> rshim_pcie.c: In function ‘rshim_pcie_mmap_vfio’:
> rshim_pcie.c:52:37: warning: overflow in conversion from ‘long long unsigned 
> int’ to ‘__off_t’ {aka ‘long int’} changes value from ‘7696581394436’ to ‘4’ 
> [-Woverflow]
>52 | #define VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(x) ((uint64_t) x << 40ULL)
>   | ^
> rshim_pcie.c:634:18: note: in expansion of macro ‘VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR’
>   634 |  VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(VFIO_PCI_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX) +
>   |  ^~~~
> rshim_pcie.c:52:37: warning: overflow in conversion from ‘long long unsigned 
> int’ to ‘__off_t’ {aka ‘long int’} changes value from ‘7696581394436’ to ‘4’ 
> [-Woverflow]
>52 | #define VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(x) ((uint64_t) x << 40ULL)
>   | ^
> rshim_pcie.c:643:19: note: in expansion of macro ‘VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR’
>   643 |   VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(VFIO_PCI_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX) +
>   |   ^~~~
> rshim_fuse.c: In function ‘rshim_fuse_misc_read’:
> rshim_fuse.c:713:36: warning: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long 
> int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int’} 
> [-Wformat=]
>   713 |   n = snprintf(p, len, "%-16s%ld(s)\n", "UP_TIME", 
> value/BF3_REF_CLK_IN_HZ);
>   |  ~~^
>   ||
>   |long int
>   |  %lld
> rshim_fuse.c: In function ‘rshim_fuse_misc_write’:
> rshim_fuse.c:954:25: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long 
> unsigned int *’, but argument 3 has type ‘uint64_t *’ {aka ‘long long 
> unsigned int *’} [-Wformat=]
>   954 | if (sscanf(p, " 0x%lx", ) != 1)
>   |   ~~^   ~~
>   | |   |
>   | |   uint64_t * {aka long long unsigned int *}
>   | long unsigned int *
>   |   %llx
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:524: rshim-rshim_fuse.o] Error 1
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: trixie/sid
>   APT prefers unstable-debug
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), 
> (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 6.6.15-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
> Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not 
> set
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled



Bug#1059484: rasdaemon: autopkgtest failure: cannot access '/var/lib/rasdaemon/ras-mc_event.db'

2024-01-08 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
I am enlightened by Paul
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ci/2024/01/msg0.html and Simon
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ci/2024/01/msg4.html . I will try
to resolve this issue by introducing iso-machine and more portable
tests. -tai

On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 9:46 PM Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)  
wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for reporting the issue. I will take a look.
>
> -tai
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 7:09 PM Paul Gevers  wrote:
> >
> > Source: rasdaemon
> > Version: 0.8.0-1
> > Severity: serious
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: fails-always
> >
> > Dear maintainer(s),
> >
> > You recently added an autopkgtest to your package rasdaemon, great.
> > However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the migration to
> > testing [1]. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it?
> >
> > I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.
> >
> > More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
> > https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rasdaemon
> >
> > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/rasdaemon/40156577/log.gz
> >
> >   34s ls: cannot access '/var/lib/rasdaemon/ras-mc_event.db': No such
> > file or directory
> >   34s autopkgtest [11:52:08]: test ras-mc-ctl



Bug#1059484: rasdaemon: autopkgtest failure: cannot access '/var/lib/rasdaemon/ras-mc_event.db'

2023-12-27 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi Paul,

Thanks for reporting the issue. I will take a look.

-tai

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 7:09 PM Paul Gevers  wrote:
>
> Source: rasdaemon
> Version: 0.8.0-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: fails-always
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> You recently added an autopkgtest to your package rasdaemon, great.
> However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the migration to
> testing [1]. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it?
>
> I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.
>
> More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
> https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
>
> Paul
>
> [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rasdaemon
>
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/rasdaemon/40156577/log.gz
>
>   34s ls: cannot access '/var/lib/rasdaemon/ras-mc_event.db': No such
> file or directory
>   34s autopkgtest [11:52:08]: test ras-mc-ctl