Hi Paul, On Sun, 2022-01-02 at 16:30 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > .. > > Moreover CGE upstream think we should abandon armel (and other non > > widely used architectures) as a target for CGE, but I think myself it is > > a good test for the compiler and tend to think we should keep it. > > I agree with you. However, as a Release Team member, I also want to > prevent packages from being out-of-sync for too long. So, what I suggest > in this case is to temporarily disable the test on armel until we have > figured out how to fix the situation. That way the package can migrate > to testing, without making the situation much worse there. Can you please review [1] before upload?
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/pascal-team/castle-game-engine/-/commit/d9b628c179bb53868e3d0bf9adc0b271969a613b -- Cheers, Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
