[Looked briefly into this, since this is a RC bug]
* Otto Kekäläinen [Sat Mar 19, 2022 at 09:04:21AM -0700]:
> Thanks for looking into this. Can you elaborate why you filed this on
> 26.4.8 and not latest 26.4.10?
>
> Builds are passing. Thus tests indicate that there is no issue. What is the
> broken thing exactly and since tests are passing, how will we verify that
> the broken thing is fixed or still broken?
The problems seems to to present also in version 26.4.11-1+b1:
| Running suite(s): gu::asio
| terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gu::Exception'
| what(): error opening datagram socketudp://127.0.0.1:0: 1 (Operation not
permitted)
| at ./galerautils/src/gu_asio_datagram.cpp:resolve_and_open():107
| terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gu::Exception'
| what(): error opening datagram socketudp://127.0.0.1:0: 1 (Operation not
permitted)
| at ./galerautils/src/gu_asio_datagram.cpp:resolve_and_open():107
| terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gu::Exception'
| what(): error opening datagram socketudp://127.0.0.1:0: 1 (Operation not
permitted)
| at ./galerautils/src/gu_asio_datagram.cpp:resolve_and_open():107
| terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gu::Exception'
| what(): error opening datagram socketudp://127.0.0.1:0: 1 (Operation not
permitted)
| at ./galerautils/src/gu_asio_datagram.cpp:resolve_and_open():107
| 94%: Checks: 77, Failures: 0, Errors: 4
|
./galerautils/tests/gu_asio_test.cpp:1811:E:test_datagram_open:test_datagram_open:0:
(after this point) Received signal 6 (Aborted)
|
./galerautils/tests/gu_asio_test.cpp:1820:E:test_datagram_connect:test_datagram_connect:0:
(after this point) Received signal 6 (Aborted)
|
./galerautils/tests/gu_asio_test.cpp:1829:E:test_datagram_open_connect:test_datagram_open_connect:0:
(after this point) Received signal 6 (Aborted)
|
./galerautils/tests/gu_asio_test.cpp:1894:E:test_datagram_send_to_and_async_read:test_datagram_send_to_and_async_read:0:
(after this point) Received signal 6 (Aborted)
| Running suite(s): gu::DeqMap
| 100%: Checks: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0
| Total tests failed: 4
--
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=galera-4=amd64=26.4.11-1%2Bb1=1652901726=0
Looking at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=galera-4=amd64 it
seems to be failing always at the x86-conova-01 builders, which
means that it seems to be environment specific. AFAICS x86-conova-01
is IPv6 only, and this is also what "FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds" in
the original bug report was about.
Possibly useful for further information/reproducing:
* https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/07/msg00070.html
* https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952740
HTH && regards
-mika-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
