Bug#1014306: crun - seriously out of date
On Friday, 22 July 2022 11:43:56 PM AEST Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Dmitry, are you still working on this package? I noticed that it's under > the debian group in Salsa -- would you be OK if someone else made an > upload? I'm not ready to abandon the package yet but can't spare any time for it at the moment, unfortunately... Of course it would be awesome if anyone could help, provided they preserve the current repository layout. > @Faidon, I suppose it would be fine to NMU and put it into DELAYED/10 > atleast till we have time for an ACK. This is triggering a bunch of > auto-rm and hence it is prudent. > Do consider doing so if you agree. Nilesh, of course NMU is OK but it would be nice if changes could be committed to repository... Note that Reinhard already uploaded 0.17+dfsg-1.1 which is committed to branch "bug.997225" which is due to be merged into "master" branch. Thank you all for your help. -- Regards, Dmitry Smirnov GPG key : 4096R/52B6BBD953968D1B --- It is impossible to imagine Goethe or Beethoven being good at billiards or golf. -- H. L. Mencken --- The Face Mask Folly in Retrospect https://swprs.org/the-face-mask-folly-in-retrospect/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1014306: crun - seriously out of date
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:43:56 +0200 Faidon Liambotis wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 09:20:37PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > crun was not uploaded since before the release of Debian 11. It is now > > seriously out of date and even fails hard as root, see #1012053. > > I built 1.4.5 using the existing Debian packaging and with no changes > other than dropping all d/patches as they are now merged upstream. The > package is fully functional with my testing. > > 1.5 was released 2 days ago as well, but I haven't tried to build that > yet. > > Dmitry, are you still working on this package? I noticed that it's under > the debian group in Salsa -- would you be OK if someone else made an > upload? CC'ing @Dmitry explicitly in case that helps. @Faidon, I suppose it would be fine to NMU and put it into DELAYED/10 atleast till we have time for an ACK. This is triggering a bunch of auto-rm and hence it is prudent. Do consider doing so if you agree. -- Best, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1014306: crun - seriously out of date
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 09:20:37PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > crun was not uploaded since before the release of Debian 11. It is now > seriously out of date and even fails hard as root, see #1012053. I built 1.4.5 using the existing Debian packaging and with no changes other than dropping all d/patches as they are now merged upstream. The package is fully functional with my testing. 1.5 was released 2 days ago as well, but I haven't tried to build that yet. Dmitry, are you still working on this package? I noticed that it's under the debian group in Salsa -- would you be OK if someone else made an upload? Thanks! Faidon
Bug#1014306: crun - seriously out of date
Package: crun Version: 0.17+dfsg-1.1+b1 Severity: serious Moin crun was not uploaded since before the release of Debian 11. It is now seriously out of date and even fails hard as root, see #1012053. Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages crun depends on: ii libc62.33-7 ii libcap2 1:2.44-1 ii libseccomp2 2.5.4-1 ii libsystemd0 251.2-7 ii libyajl2 2.1.0-3 crun recommends no packages. crun suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
