Bug#1024852: nvidia-driver in bullseye (470.141.03-1~deb11u1) and bullseye-backports (470.103.01-1~bpo11+1) do not support Linux kernel 6.0 or later

2022-11-27 Thread Alex Relis

So what is the proposal there?


The proposal is to include an updated nvidia-driver in backports so that 
it works with the backported Linux 6.0 kernel.



Just do not install 6.0 kernel from backports if you need nvidia driver?


Well, what if there is a scenario where the user needed 6.0 and the 
newer nvidia-driver? But even still, the fact of the matter is that an 
unknowing user who has a backported kernel and nvidia-driver will update 
their packages and then lose their nvidia-driver. Luckily my friend had 
integrated graphics to fall back on, but if he had one of those AMD APUs 
without an iGPU he would be left with a system without graphics.



Why are you
a) filing a bug which is already fixed in Debian, and


Has the bug been fixed? I believe there is a misunderstanding. From what 
I can tell by previous bug reports for this package, the bug hasn't been 
fixed, is reproducible, and still happening. The Phoronix article is 
talking about a newer version of nvidia-driver that has not been 
packaged in bullseye or bullseye-backports (although newer versions are 
in bookworm and sid).



b) why are you filing it against the bpo version of the package?


Because a) I don't know how to file the bug report for both versions 
other than submitting two bug reports, which seems redundant and b) 
because I'd imagine the backports team would have more leeway to update 
the package compared to the stable branch, and c) I'd imagine that if a 
user needs a newer kernel, they are also likely to have newer hardware 
as a whole which would necessitate a newer, backported nvidia-driver as 
well.



It is a very questionable bug report, and for me as a maintainer
(not of this package though) it discourages me from doing more
backports (just a personal opinion/feeling).


I hope my bug report didn't dissuade you from contributing to Debian. At 
the same time, I am not seeing what's the problem as there is a 
dependency conflict and I am simply reporting that conflict so that the 
maintainers are aware of it. There is nothing personal about this. 
Ultimately I was just trying to help.


--
Alex Relis


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1024852: nvidia-driver in bullseye (470.141.03-1~deb11u1) and bullseye-backports (470.103.01-1~bpo11+1) do not support Linux kernel 6.0 or later

2022-11-26 Thread Michael Tokarev

On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 12:43:12 -0800 Alex Relis  wrote:

Package: nvidia-driver
Version: 470.103.01-1~bpo11+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

About a week ago, linux-image-6.0.0-0.deb11.2-amd64 was introduced in 
bullseye-backports. The problem is that the nvidia-driver version in both 
bullseye (470.141.03-1~deb11u1) and bullseye-backports (470.103.01-1~bpo11+1) 
(for some reason, the version in bullseye is newer which is strange) DO NOT 
support Linux kernel 6.0.
When a user who uses a backported linux kernel and nvidia-driver upgrades their 
system, they will get an error message that looks like this 
https://imgur.com/sEVx1vc (sorry if I couldn't give you the text output; I am 
reporting this on behalf of a friend)

This issue is reproducable and happened on two of my friends' machines. We found a current 
workaround that involves booting to kernel 5.1x in the Grub menu, running sudo apt purge 
linux-image-6.0.0-0.deb11.2-amd64 && sudo apt install -t bullseye-backports 
nvidia-driver && sudo reboot now.


So what is the proposal there?

Just do not install 6.0 kernel from backports if you need nvidia driver?


According to this Phoronix article ( 
https://www.phoronix.com/news/NVIDIA-515.76-Linux-Driver ), nvidia-driver 
515.76 or newer support Linux kernel 6.0. I believe the solution is to upgrade 
nvidia-driver to 515.76 or newer in bullseye-backports so that users can use 
their graphics card on kernel 6.0.


As you state yourself, this bug is already fixed in the more recent version
of the package.

Why are you
a) filing a bug which is already fixed in Debian, and
b) why are you filing it against the bpo version of the package?

It is like installing this version of driver breaks system.
(especially since apt will not install this version, since a more
recent version is available in bullseye already).

It is a very questionable bug report, and for me as a maintainer
(not of this package though) it discourages me from doing more
backports (just a personal opinion/feeling).

/mjt



Bug#1024852: nvidia-driver in bullseye (470.141.03-1~deb11u1) and bullseye-backports (470.103.01-1~bpo11+1) do not support Linux kernel 6.0 or later

2022-11-26 Thread Alex Relis
Package: nvidia-driver
Version: 470.103.01-1~bpo11+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

About a week ago, linux-image-6.0.0-0.deb11.2-amd64 was introduced in 
bullseye-backports. The problem is that the nvidia-driver version in both 
bullseye (470.141.03-1~deb11u1) and bullseye-backports (470.103.01-1~bpo11+1) 
(for some reason, the version in bullseye is newer which is strange) DO NOT 
support Linux kernel 6.0.
When a user who uses a backported linux kernel and nvidia-driver upgrades their 
system, they will get an error message that looks like this 
https://imgur.com/sEVx1vc (sorry if I couldn't give you the text output; I am 
reporting this on behalf of a friend)

This issue is reproducable and happened on two of my friends' machines. We 
found a current workaround that involves booting to kernel 5.1x in the Grub 
menu, running sudo apt purge linux-image-6.0.0-0.deb11.2-amd64 && sudo apt 
install -t bullseye-backports nvidia-driver && sudo reboot now.

According to this Phoronix article ( 
https://www.phoronix.com/news/NVIDIA-515.76-Linux-Driver ), nvidia-driver 
515.76 or newer support Linux kernel 6.0. I believe the solution is to upgrade 
nvidia-driver to 515.76 or newer in bullseye-backports so that users can use 
their graphics card on kernel 6.0.

Thank you for reading my bug report and I hope you guys have a great day!

--
Alex Relis