Bug#1029250: meson: FTBFS: ./b 52a78b9866/../test cases/failing build/2 hidden symbol/bobuser.c:4: undefined reference to `hidden_function'

2023-01-22 Thread Jussi Pakkanen 
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 13:06, Lucas Nussbaum  wrote:

> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > /usr/bin/ld: bobuser.p/bobuser.c.o: in function `main':
> > ./b 52a78b9866/../test cases/failing build/2 hidden symbol/bobuser.c:4: 
> > undefined reference to `hidden_function'
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

This is the umpteenth time this has been reported and the error
message is as wrong as always. The actual error has to do with TAP
parsing. It should be fixed by this, which will be in the next point
release:

https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/pull/11324

Bug#1029250: meson: FTBFS: ./b 52a78b9866/../test cases/failing build/2 hidden symbol/bobuser.c:4: undefined reference to `hidden_function'

2023-01-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
Source: meson
Version: 1.0.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230120 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: bobuser.p/bobuser.c.o: in function `main':
> ./b 52a78b9866/../test cases/failing build/2 hidden symbol/bobuser.c:4: 
> undefined reference to `hidden_function'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/20/meson_1.0.0-1.1_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230120;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=ftbfs-20230120=lu...@debian.org=1=1=1=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.