Your message dated Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:04:19 -0700
with message-id <873567yrho....@athena.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1031888: emacs-nox: bullseye-security update fails to
install on mips64el
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031888,
regarding emacs-nox: bullseye-security update fails to install on mips64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1031888: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031888
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: emacs
Version: 1:27.1+1-3.1+deb11u2
Severity: grave
Control: affects -1 + security.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ad...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Upgrading emacs-nox on a bullseye mips64el system to the latest
security update fails:
Setting up emacs-nox (1:27.1+1-3.1+deb11u2) ...
update-alternatives: using /usr/bin/emacs-nox to provide /usr/bin/emacs (emacs)
in auto mode
Install emacsen-common for emacs
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs
emacs: could not load dump file
"/usr/lib/emacs/27.1/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/emacs.pdmp": out of memory
ERROR: install script from emacsen-common package failed
dpkg: error processing package emacs-nox (--configure):
installed emacs-nox package post-installation script subprocess returned error
exit status 1
Downgrading to +deb11u1 on the same system works fine. Removing the
emacs packages and installing +deb11u2 directly fails in the same way.
This is reproducible on four debian.org buildds.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:28.2+1-11
Hello,
On Sun 26 Feb 2023 at 09:41PM +02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> While I suspect they are the same, there is no proof that this leak is
> actually the same as the mips64el installation issue.
Looks like it was.
--
Sean Whitton
--- End Message ---
