Bug#318926: gettext-base package not renamed for C++ ABI change

2005-07-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: gettext-base
Version: 0.14.5-2
Severity: serious

the libasprintf library contained in gettext-base is built for the new
C++ ABI. IMO you cannot use the same package name.

Maybe a correct solution is to split the library into a separate
libasprintf0c2 package and keep the -dev files in the gettext-base
package.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#318926: gettext-base package not renamed for C++ ABI change

2005-07-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Santiago Vila writes:
 On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
 
  Package: gettext-base
  Version: 0.14.5-2
  Severity: serious
  
  the libasprintf library contained in gettext-base is built for the new
  C++ ABI. IMO you cannot use the same package name.
 
 Yes, I can, because packages linked to libasprintf depend (via the
 dpkg-shlibdeps mechanism) on the library provided by gettext-base,
 *not* on gettext-base itself, and I have renamed the library provided
 by gettext-base and modified accordingly the shlibs file.

ok, I see it now.

 I fully agree that it would be a serious bug if packages linked to
 libasprintf just had a Depends: gettext-base, but that's not the case.
 
 Moreover, AFAIK, there is not a single package in Debian using this
 library yet.

The latter one is not a valid reason on its own, as there may be
packages outside the Debian repository.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]