Bug#329459: still failing

2005-09-27 Thread Jérôme Marant
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Perhaps the ppc64 detection is broken, and so something wrong is

 The ppc64 detection is not broken. It has been tested by the
 ppc64 porters. 

 It sounded to me like Thomas was just suggesting that the ppc64 patch
 might be causing configure to accidentally return a false positive on
 ppc32 machines, not that it was doing anything wrong on ppc64
 machines, or is that how you read him too?

OK.

 In any case, it seems like trying to build on a ppc32 host with the
 ppc64 patch temporarily omitted will at least let us know if that
 alleviates the segfault.

I'll take care of this. I have the necessary hardware for testing.

Cheers,

-- 
Jérôme Marant



Bug#329459: still failing

2005-09-27 Thread Rob Browning
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 In any case, it seems like trying to build on a ppc32 host with the
 ppc64 patch temporarily omitted will at least let us know if that
 alleviates the segfault.

 I'll take care of this. I have the necessary hardware for testing.

Oh, that's great.  I was attempting it on voltaire, but it doesn't
have the build deps installed, and so I had to ask debian-admin to add
them.  However, if you can handle the testing, then we won't have to
wait on them to respond.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4



Bug#329459: still failing

2005-09-26 Thread Rob Browning
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This emacs21 bug is still around, blocking some other packages too.
 Since version 21.4a-1 works just fine on powerpc, perhaps the
 following change in 21.4a-2 might just be the problem?  It does rather
 stand out.

  * Apply patch supporting the ppc64 architecture. This is a slightly
  modified patch derived from the Emacs CVS mainline.
  (closes: #300368) [Jérôme Marant]
  - debian/patches/arch-ppc64.patch: new file.
  - debian/00list: updated.

 Perhaps the ppc64 detection is broken, and so something wrong is
 happening on ppc32.  Perhaps drop this patch and see if that causes
 the regression to vanish?  

That seems likely.  I should get a chance to test today or tomorrow.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4



Bug#329459: still failing

2005-09-26 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 That seems likely.  I should get a chance to test today or tomorrow.

Sweet. :)  Let me know if there's anything I can do to help.

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329459: still failing

2005-09-26 Thread Jérôme Marant
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This emacs21 bug is still around, blocking some other packages too.
 Since version 21.4a-1 works just fine on powerpc, perhaps the
 following change in 21.4a-2 might just be the problem?  It does rather
 stand out.

  * Apply patch supporting the ppc64 architecture. This is a slightly
  modified patch derived from the Emacs CVS mainline.
  (closes: #300368) [Jérôme Marant]
  - debian/patches/arch-ppc64.patch: new file.
  - debian/00list: updated.

 Perhaps the ppc64 detection is broken, and so something wrong is

The ppc64 detection is not broken. It has been tested by the
ppc64 porters. 

 happening on ppc32.  Perhaps drop this patch and see if that causes
 the regression to vanish?  

One must double check with the CVS trunk then.

-- 
Jérôme Marant



Bug#329459: still failing

2005-09-26 Thread Rob Browning
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Perhaps the ppc64 detection is broken, and so something wrong is

 The ppc64 detection is not broken. It has been tested by the
 ppc64 porters. 

It sounded to me like Thomas was just suggesting that the ppc64 patch
might be causing configure to accidentally return a false positive on
ppc32 machines, not that it was doing anything wrong on ppc64
machines, or is that how you read him too?

In any case, it seems like trying to build on a ppc32 host with the
ppc64 patch temporarily omitted will at least let us know if that
alleviates the segfault.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4