Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10
On 07.11.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was reproduced by another setup as the orginal file tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW was deleted accicidentally. I think the contents of the two files are the same. Hmm, I guess that was an upgrade from an older version. What makes me wondering is that your postin of tetex-bin creates two LaTeX formats: fmtutil-sys: running `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `etex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex *latex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdftex -progname=pdftex pdftex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex pdflatex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex *pdflatex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfelatex -progname=pdfelatex *pdfelatex.ini' ... The contents of /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ are: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1364 2005-10-05 22:51 00tex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3704 2004-08-13 20:12 01tetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3091 2005-10-19 11:31 01tetex.cnf.dpkg-dist -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 21:05 40jadetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 565 2005-10-31 20:40 50cyrtexinfo.cnf Well, this is similar to #337945. You refused to write the 01tetex.cnf from the maintainer over your locally changed one (which is BTW the default) and hence teTeX used the old entries, we had in teTeX 2.0. I've no clue how to solve that problem in general. Nope Sorry, I was completely wrong! 01tetex.cnf was introduced in teTeX 3.0. That 01tetex.cnf visible here is equivalent to the old 00tetex.cnf from teTeX 2.0. It has the same size the 00tetex.cnf should have and a very old timestamp. In preinst we move the old 00tetex.cnf to 01tetex.cnf. At any time dpkg comes along and finds out, that 01tetex.cnf has been changed (as it differs from that one in the package). If the user now refuses to replace the local version by that one from the maint (which is the default) fmtutil now starts creating formats with the old configuration. --- *bamm* If you never touched 00tetex.cnf simply overwriting 01tetex.cnf by 01tetex.cnf.dpkg-dist should fix the problem. That renaming is probably a bad idea. I'll open another bug for that. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334613: [SPAM?]: Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In preinst we move the old 00tetex.cnf to 01tetex.cnf. At any time dpkg comes along and finds out, that 01tetex.cnf has been changed (as it differs from that one in the package). It's ucf-managed: $ grep fmt.d /var/lib/ucf/hashfile 757459dda86e1bd31e68dacbba9b422d /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf If the user now refuses to replace the local version by that one from the maint (which is the default) fmtutil now starts creating formats with the old configuration. --- *bamm* That's how it goes, live is hard, but because of ucf it will only happen if the user *has* changed the conffile. If you refuse to accept new maintainer's versions, or install noninteractively, you should investigate the conffiles before filing a bug. If you never touched 00tetex.cnf simply overwriting 01tetex.cnf by 01tetex.cnf.dpkg-dist should fix the problem. If he'd never touched 00tetex.cnf, ucf would know the old version and not ask at all, but simply overwrite. Except if the file already existed in woody; we don't have an old md5sum for woody versions. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#334613: [SPAM?]: Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10
On 10.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, If the user now refuses to replace the local version by that one from the maint (which is the default) fmtutil now starts creating formats with the old configuration. --- *bamm* That's how it goes, live is hard, but because of ucf it will only happen if the user *has* changed the conffile. If you refuse to accept new maintainer's versions, or install noninteractively, you should investigate the conffiles before filing a bug. Eddie: do you agree, that this is not really a bug? If you never touched 00tetex.cnf simply overwriting 01tetex.cnf by 01tetex.cnf.dpkg-dist should fix the problem. If he'd never touched 00tetex.cnf, ucf would know the old version and not ask at all, but simply overwrite. Except if the file already existed in woody; we don't have an old md5sum for woody versions. Therefore I could not reproduce that bug during upgrade using a non-changed 00tetex.cnf... Sorry forgot about ucf. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10
Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 07.11.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was reproduced by another setup as the orginal file tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW was deleted accicidentally. I think the contents of the two files are the same. Hmm, I guess that was an upgrade from an older version. What makes me wondering is that your postin of tetex-bin creates two LaTeX formats: fmtutil-sys: running `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `etex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex *latex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdftex -progname=pdftex pdftex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex pdflatex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex *pdflatex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfelatex -progname=pdfelatex *pdfelatex.ini' ... The contents of /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ are: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1364 2005-10-05 22:51 00tex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3704 2004-08-13 20:12 01tetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3091 2005-10-19 11:31 01tetex.cnf.dpkg-dist -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 21:05 40jadetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 565 2005-10-31 20:40 50cyrtexinfo.cnf Well, this is similar to #337945. You refused to write the 01tetex.cnf from the maintainer over your locally changed one (which is BTW the default) and hence teTeX used the old entries, we had in teTeX 2.0. I've no clue how to solve that problem in general. Nope Sorry, I was completely wrong! 01tetex.cnf was introduced in teTeX 3.0. That 01tetex.cnf visible here is equivalent to the old 00tetex.cnf from teTeX 2.0. It has the same size the 00tetex.cnf should have and a very old timestamp. In preinst we move the old 00tetex.cnf to 01tetex.cnf. At any time dpkg comes along and finds out, that 01tetex.cnf has been changed (as it differs from that one in the package). If the user now refuses to replace the local version by that one from the maint (which is the default) fmtutil now starts creating formats with the old configuration. --- *bamm* If you never touched 00tetex.cnf simply overwriting 01tetex.cnf by 01tetex.cnf.dpkg-dist should fix the problem. That renaming is probably a bad idea. I'll open another bug for that. H. Dear Hilmar I have followed your instructions in your email dated 7 Nov. The post-installation is sucessful. Regards Eddie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10
Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K?ster wrote: Eddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please include this file if you report a bug. Do you still have the file, or can you reproduce it, and send it to us? As requested, the relevant file is enclosed. fmtutil-sys: running `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini' ... This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) (INITEX) ---! /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt was written by tex (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied) I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was reproduced by another setup as the orginal file tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW was deleted accicidentally. I think the contents of the two files are the same. Hmm, I guess that was an upgrade from an older version. What makes me wondering is that your postin of tetex-bin creates two LaTeX formats: fmtutil-sys: running `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `etex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex *latex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdftex -progname=pdftex pdftex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex pdflatex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex *pdflatex.ini' ... fmtutil-sys: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfelatex -progname=pdfelatex *pdfelatex.ini' ... heavily snipped fmtutil-sys: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt installed. fmtutil-sys: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfelatex.fmt installed. fmtutil-sys: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt installed. fmtutil-sys: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex.fmt installed. . Please show us the content of /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ . Seems there is something left from teTeX 2.0. And please keep the bug in CC, when answering. Regards, Hilmar The contents of /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ are: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1364 2005-10-05 22:51 00tex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3704 2004-08-13 20:12 01tetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3091 2005-10-19 11:31 01tetex.cnf.dpkg-dist -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 21:05 40jadetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 565 2005-10-31 20:40 50cyrtexinfo.cnf Regards, Eddie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10
On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K?ster wrote: Eddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW ^^^ This filename differs from the name of the file you sent us (if I assume you didn't change it before attaching it). Please include this file if you report a bug. Do you still have the file, or can you reproduce it, and send it to us? Regards, Frank As requested, the relevant file is enclosed. snip fmtutil-sys: running `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini' ... This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) (INITEX) ---! /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt was written by tex (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied) H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10
Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Followup-For: Bug #334613 The bug#334613 seems remained as the upgrade still failed. fmtutil-sys: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully. Visit the log files in directory /var/lib/texmf/web2c for details. This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings: `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini' failed fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW Please include this file if you report a bug. dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=zh_TW, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 (charmap=BIG5) (ignored: LC_ALL set to zh_TW) Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.15 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1package maintenance system for Deb ii ed0.2-20 The classic unix line editor ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libkpathsea4 3.0-10.1 path search library for teTeX (run ii libpaper1 1.1.14-3 Library for handling paper charact ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libt1-5 5.1.0-2Type 1 font rasterizer library - r ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li ii libxaw8 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Athena widget set library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxmu6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxp66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System printing extension ii libxpm4 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X pixmap library ii libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii mime-support 3.35-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii perl 5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii sed 4.1.4-4The GNU sed stream editor ii tetex-base3.0-10 Basic library files of teTeX ii ucf 2.003 Update Configuration File: preserv ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries mii zlib1g1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime Versions of packages tetex-bin recommends: ii dialog1.0-20051005-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii libxml-parser-perl2.34-4 Perl module for parsing XML files ii perl-tk 1:800.025-2Perl module providing the Tk graph ii psutils 1.17-19A collection of PostScript documen ii whiptail 0.51.6-31 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe -- debconf information: tetex-bin/updmap-failed: * tetex-bin/hyphen: ngerman[=naustrian-neue_Rechtschreibung], french[=patois] tetex-bin/oldcfg: true tetex-bin/upd_map: true * tetex-bin/cnf_name: tetex-bin/fmtutil: true * tetex-bin/use_debconf: false tetex-bin/fmtutil-failed: * tetex-bin/texmf: false -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10
Eddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW Please include this file if you report a bug. Do you still have the file, or can you reproduce it, and send it to us? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
