Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
reopen 368883 thanks * debian/patches/17_alpha_ice.dpatch: new patch from Steve Langasek to fix FTBFS on alpha (Closes: #368883) (urgency set to high for that fix). sigh Except that, by adding in the new upstream release at the same time, qt4-x11 is now hitting the same error in a different part of the code... [...] g++ -c -pipe -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/postgresql -g -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_SHARED -DQT_BUILD_OPENGL_LIB -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQT3_SUPPORT -DQT_MOC_COMPAT -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -I../../mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I../../include/QtCore -I../../include/QtGui -I../../include -I../../include/QtOpenGL -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.moc/debug-shared -I. -o .obj/debug-shared/qgl.o qgl.cpp ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/thread/qthreadstorage.h: In constructor 'QThreadStorageT::QThreadStorage() [with T = QGLThreadContext*]': ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/thread/qthreadstorage.h:116: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs. make[4]: *** [.obj/debug-shared/qgl.o] Error 1 [...] So, reopening. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Hi, Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no less than 83 packages. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 368883 + pending Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha Tags were: patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
tag 368883 + pending thanks Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 10:57, Samuel Thibault a écrit : Hi, Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no less than 83 packages. Samuel that one is quite annoying. Brian: will you have time to fix that soon (like in less than a couple of days ?) else I'll do an upload just to fix the alpha FTBFS now that there is a patch. If I've no news from you, I suppose I'll do an upload on sunday. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgphIPyRA2lFc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tag 368883 + pending thanks Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 10:57, Samuel Thibault a écrit : Hi, Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no less than 83 packages. Samuel that one is quite annoying. Brian: will you have time to fix that soon (like in less than a couple of days ?) else I'll do an upload just to fix the alpha FTBFS now that there is a patch. If I've no news from you, I suppose I'll do an upload on sunday. I should be able to do it today (Saturday). If not, go ahead and upload on Sunday. -- Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
tags 368883 patch
thanks
So, having diagnosed that this is an interaction between
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden and referencing inlined methods (bug #369642),
the obvious workaround is to keep the problematic methods from getting
inlined.
The attached patch should do this; unfortunately, I haven't tested it
completely because qt4-x11 is also missing a build-conflict with
unixodbc-dev, and I don't have the patience to try to build it a second time
on alpha. Please consider applying the patch, I don't believe it has
negative side-effects for other archs.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
diff -u qt4-x11-4.1.2/debian/changelog qt4-x11-4.1.2/debian/changelog
--- qt4-x11-4.1.2/debian/changelog
+++ qt4-x11-4.1.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+qt4-x11 (4.1.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Workaround for -fvisibility-inlines-hidden on alpha: break out the
+static methods so they're not inlined. Closes: #368883.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 30 May 2006 19:56:44 -0700
+
qt4-x11 (4.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/libqt4-debug-dev.install, debian/libqt4-dev.install: added
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- qt4-x11-4.1.2.orig/src/corelib/global/qlibraryinfo.cpp
+++ qt4-x11-4.1.2/src/corelib/global/qlibraryinfo.cpp
@@ -47,14 +47,7 @@
{
public:
static QSettings *findConfiguration();
-static void cleanup()
-{
-QLibrarySettings *ls = qt_library_settings();
-if (ls) {
-delete static_castQSettings *(ls-settings);
-ls-settings = 0;
-}
-}
+static void cleanup();
static QSettings *configuration()
{
QLibrarySettings *ls = qt_library_settings();
@@ -64,6 +57,15 @@
Q_GLOBAL_STATIC(QLibrarySettings, qt_library_settings)
};
+void QLibraryInfoPrivate::cleanup()
+{
+QLibrarySettings *ls = qt_library_settings();
+if (ls) {
+delete static_castQSettings *(ls-settings);
+ls-settings = 0;
+}
+}
+
QLibrarySettings::QLibrarySettings()
{
settings = QLibraryInfoPrivate::findConfiguration();
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- qt4-x11-4.1.2.orig/src/corelib/tools/qhash.h
+++ qt4-x11-4.1.2/src/corelib/tools/qhash.h
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@
}
template class Key, class T
-Q_INLINE_TEMPLATE void QHashKey, T::duplicateNode(QHashData::Node *node,
void *newNode)
+void QHashKey, T::duplicateNode(QHashData::Node *node, void *newNode)
{
Node *concreteNode = concrete(node);
if (QTypeInfoT::isDummy) {
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
clone 368883 -1 reassign -1 g++-4.0 severity -1 important thanks This ICE also happens with g++-4.1 and gcc-snapshot. Working on a minimal test case. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Package: qt4-x11 Version: 4.1.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gcc ICEd when attempting to build qt4-x11 on alpha on 2006-05-14. I don't know what's the issue and what could fix. However, 4.1.2-1 built and the changes to -2 seem minimal, so it should be easy to check whether there was a gcc regression or the qt4-x11 changes triggered the FTBFS and need a workaround. qt4-x11 needs an update for X11R7 to reach testing, and I heard that transition was planned for soon (possibly under 1 week). So, until this bug is fixed, either it will a blocker, or 4.1.2-1 will be pushed on alpha (which looks better, *if* doing that is possible). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gcc ICEd when attempting to build qt4-x11 on alpha on 2006-05-14. I don't know what's the issue and what could fix. However, 4.1.2-1 built and the changes to -2 seem minimal, so it should be easy to check whether there was a gcc regression or the qt4-x11 changes triggered the FTBFS and need a workaround. Isn't an ICE always a compiler bug? In any case, nothing in the Qt code changed between -1 and -2, so it's certainly a GCC regression. -- Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Brian Nelson a écrit : Isn't an ICE always a compiler bug? Yes, I was just asking if it was a new bug or a pre-existing one. In any case, nothing in the Qt code changed between -1 and -2, so it's certainly a GCC regression. Thanks for the information...I guess that's bad news. It seems there are almost 2 monthes of changes in the gcc 4.0 branch between 4.0.3-1 and 4.0.3-3, so it's quite possible that it's indeed a GCC regression. When looking at the gcc-4.0 bugs reported in Debian's BTS for 4.0.3-1, I can't see much that would explain this. I'm completely clueless about building, but somebody should start by figuring which GCC regression is blocking this. Given the fact that branch 4.0 looks very inactive, maybe the easiest thing would be to identify the changeset which introduced this regression.
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Le Jeu 25 Mai 2006 22:30, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : Brian Nelson a écrit : Isn't an ICE always a compiler bug? Yes, I was just asking if it was a new bug or a pre-existing one. In any case, nothing in the Qt code changed between -1 and -2, so it's certainly a GCC regression. Thanks for the information...I guess that's bad news. It seems there are almost 2 monthes of changes in the gcc 4.0 branch between 4.0.3-1 and 4.0.3-3, so it's quite possible that it's indeed a GCC regression. When looking at the gcc-4.0 bugs reported in Debian's BTS for 4.0.3-1, I can't see much that would explain this. I'm completely clueless about building, but somebody should start by figuring which GCC regression is blocking this. Given the fact that branch 4.0 looks very inactive, maybe the easiest thing would be to identify the changeset which introduced this regression. one can also try to compile it with gcc 4.1 -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpgodT8j8Pjf.pgp Description: PGP signature
