Bug#391611: miredo: death by IPv6 router solicitation

2006-10-08 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Le dimanche 8 octobre 2006 01:37, vous avez écrit :
 I'm able to get reproduce this both at home and at work -- so let me
 know what moreinfo you'd like and I'll certainly be happy to debug
 this with you.

I think I found the bug.

Does http://www.remlab.net/files/miredo/debian/miredo_1.0.4-1_i386.deb 
solves your problem?

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/


pgpi0URfPMxlh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: Re: Bug#391611: miredo: death by IPv6 router solicitation

2006-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 391611 - moreinfo
Bug#391611: miredo: death by IPv6 router solicitation
Tags were: confirmed moreinfo upstream
Tags removed: moreinfo

 tags 391611 + fixed-upstream pending
Bug#391611: miredo: death by IPv6 router solicitation
Tags were: confirmed upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream, pending

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#391611: miredo: death by IPv6 router solicitation

2006-10-08 Thread Anand Kumria

On 10/8/06, Rémi Denis-Courmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Le dimanche 8 octobre 2006 01:37, vous avez écrit :
 I'm able to get reproduce this both at home and at work -- so let me
 know what moreinfo you'd like and I'll certainly be happy to debug
 this with you.

I think I found the bug.

Does http://www.remlab.net/files/miredo/debian/miredo_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
solves your problem?


Confirmed on my home network where I get:

[pid 17716] 00:11:28 sendmsg(8, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET,
sin_port=htons(3544), sin_addr=inet_addr(83.170.6.76)},
msg_iov(2)=[{\0\1\0\0P7\20N\257\227\340_\0, 13},
{`\0\0\0\0\10:\377\376\200\0\0\0\0\0\0\200\0TEREDO\377\2..., 48}],
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 61
[pid 17716] 00:11:28 sendmsg(8, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET,
sin_port=htons(3544), sin_addr=inet_addr(83.170.6.77)},
msg_iov(2)=[{\0\1\0\0\306\241\206\3309\1v\311\0, 13},
{`\0\0\0\0\10:\377\376\200\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\377\377..., 48}],
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 61
[pid 17716] 00:11:28 sendmsg(8, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET,
sin_port=htons(3544), sin_addr=inet_addr(83.170.6.76)},
msg_iov(2)=[{\0\1\0\0\\\365\177\\\334\335\0077\0, 13},
{`\0\0\0\0\10:\377\376\200\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\377\377..., 48}],
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 61



[pid 17716] 00:13:08 sendmsg(8, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET,
sin_port=htons(3544), sin_addr=inet_addr(83.170.6.76)},
msg_iov(2)=[{\0\1\0\0]s\204\2332\217\272\325\0, 13},
{`\0\0\0\0\10:\377\376\200\0\0\0\0\0\0\200\0TEREDO\377\2..., 48}],
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 61
[pid 17716] 00:13:08 sendmsg(8, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET,
sin_port=htons(3544), sin_addr=inet_addr(83.170.6.77)},
msg_iov(2)=[{\0\1\0\0\313\345\22\r\244\31,C\0, 13},
{`\0\0\0\0\10:\377\376\200\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\377\377..., 48}],
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 61
[pid 17716] 00:13:08 sendmsg(8, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET,
sin_port=htons(3544), sin_addr=inet_addr(83.170.6.76)},
msg_iov(2)=[{\0\1\0\0\311r\3627\213K\317i\0, 13},
{`\0\0\0\0\10:\377\376\200\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\377\377..., 48}],
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 61

which is much nicer.

I'll confirm at work tomorrow.

Thanks,
Anand