Bug#393404: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 03:02:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#393404: fixed in openldap2.3 2.3.29-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: openldap2.3 Version: 2.3.25-1 Severity: serious Hi! This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in the thread with Subject: Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages. It seems this source package contains the following files from the IETF under non-free license terms: openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc1274.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2079.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2247.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2251.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2252.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2253.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2254.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2255.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2256.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2293.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2294.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2307.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2377.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2587.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2589.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2649.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2696.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2713.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2714.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2798.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2829.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2830.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2849.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2891.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2926.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3045.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3062.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3088.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3112.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3296.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3377.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3383.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3663.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3671.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3672.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3673.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3674.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3687.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3698.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3703.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3712.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3727.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3771.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3829.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3866.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3876.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3909.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3928.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc4013.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc4370.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc4373.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc4403.txt The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 * http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation * http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments The etch release policy says binary and source packages must each be free: * http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy: * http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg There are (at least) three ways to fix this problem. In order of preference: 1. Ask the author of the RFC to re-license the RFC under a free license. A template for this e-mail request can be found at http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments 2. Remove the non-free material from the source, e.g., by re-packaging the upstream archive and adding a 'dfsg' version name to it. 3. Move the package to non-free. I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files, and there may be false positives. If this is the case for your package, I'm sorry for the noise. I'll modify the scripts to take into account false positives when I learn of them, and publish the list of exceptions under Known exceptions at http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments. Thanks, Simon ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: openldap2.3 Source-Version: 2.3.29-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openldap2.3, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ldap-utils_2.3.29-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openldap2.3/ldap-utils_2.3.29-1_i386.deb libldap-2.3-0_2.3.29-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openldap2.3/libldap-2.3-0_2.3.29-1_i386.deb openldap2.3_2.3.29-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openldap2.3/openldap2.3_2.3.29-1.diff.gz openldap2.3_2.3.29-1.dsc to pool/main/o/openldap2.3/openldap2.3_2.3.29-1.dsc openldap2.3_2.3.29.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/openldap2.3/openldap2.3_2.3.29.orig.tar.gz slapd_2.3.29-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openldap2.3/slapd_2.3.29-1_i386.deb A summary of
Bug#393404: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:13:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#393404: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: openldap2.3 Version: 2.3.25-1 Severity: serious Hi! This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in the thread with Subject: Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages. It seems this source package contains the following files from the IETF under non-free license terms: openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc1274.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2079.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2247.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2251.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2252.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2253.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2254.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2255.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2256.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2293.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2294.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2307.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2377.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2587.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2589.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2649.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2696.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2713.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2714.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2798.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2829.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2830.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2849.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2891.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2926.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3045.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3062.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3088.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3112.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3296.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3377.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3383.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3663.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3671.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3672.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3673.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3674.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3687.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3698.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3703.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3712.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3727.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3771.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3829.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3866.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3876.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3909.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc3928.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc4013.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc4370.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc4373.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc4403.txt The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 * http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation * http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments The etch release policy says binary and source packages must each be free: * http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy: * http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg There are (at least) three ways to fix this problem. In order of preference: 1. Ask the author of the RFC to re-license the RFC under a free license. A template for this e-mail request can be found at http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments 2. Remove the non-free material from the source, e.g., by re-packaging the upstream archive and adding a 'dfsg' version name to it. 3. Move the package to non-free. I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files, and there may be false positives. If this is the case for your package, I'm sorry for the noise. I'll modify the scripts to take into account false positives when I learn of them, and publish the list of exceptions under Known exceptions at http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments. Thanks, Simon ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Simon Josefsson wrote: Package: openldap2.3 Version: 2.3.25-1 Severity: serious Hi! This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in the thread with Subject: Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages. It seems this source package contains the following files from the IETF under non-free license terms: openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc1274.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2079.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2247.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2251.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2252.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2253.txt openldap-2.3.25/doc/rfc/rfc2254.txt
