Bug#418393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#418393: Upgrade problem: lpr tries to overwrite logcheck-database files
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: Does this mean the bug should be reassigned to logcheck-database? The appropriate action, IMO, would be to Replace: logcheck-database; we can then remove that file at our leisure. (I for one am using l-d from backports.org on my servers, so I'd favor waiting until after lenny's release.) -- Being overloaded is the sign of a true Debian maintainer. -- JHM on #Debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#418393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#418393: Upgrade problem: lpr tries to overwrite logcheck-database files
martin f krafft wrote: logcheck-database exists as a bag for rules that are not in the packages. If a package provides its own rule files, the logcheck-database must not. Yes, that makes very good sense. I've just added the missing rule from 1.2.63 logcheck-database to lpr package. Does this mean the bug should be reassigned to logcheck-database? - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#418393: Upgrade problem: lpr tries to overwrite logcheck-database files
Frédéric Brière wrote: severity 418393 serious thanks On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:49:01PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: Yes, definitely. The fix is just to remove the conffile from lpr. No Seems to me like these two files should at least be merged, as they have different rules. Since logcheck ships lots and lots of files, it may be best for lpr to either rename the file to something like, like lpr.package, or just drop the file altogether. I'll take a look at the rules today and get this done.. As for which package should inherit from the other, I'm a strong proponent of having individual packages ship their own rules, but it's really up to you. Ideally, logcheck shipping its files named package.logcheck or package.lc or similar would have been more compatible with packages providing their own rules. But I guess that can't really be done now.. - Adam PS. Sorry, I guess I've forgotten about this bug :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#418393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#418393: Upgrade problem: lpr tries to overwrite logcheck-database files
also sprach Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.03.17.1748 +0100]: Since logcheck ships lots and lots of files, it may be best for lpr to either rename the file to something like, like lpr.package, or just drop the file altogether. I'll take a look at the rules today and get this done.. The rules should just be merged into one file and distributed as part of the lpr package. Ideally, logcheck shipping its files named package.logcheck or package.lc or similar would have been more compatible with packages providing their own rules. But I guess that can't really be done now.. logcheck-database exists as a bag for rules that are not in the packages. If a package provides its own rule files, the logcheck-database must not. -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems man soll nicht in kirchen gehn, wenn man reine luft atmen will. - friedrich nietzsche digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Processed: Re: Bug#418393: Upgrade problem: lpr tries to overwrite logcheck-database files
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 418393 serious Bug#418393: Upgrade problem: lpr tries to overwrite logcheck-database files Severity set to `serious' from `normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
