Bug#430241: marked as done (ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390)

2008-02-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#430241: fixed in lam 7.1.2-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: lam4-dev
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: goal-ldbl128

Discussed in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg01173.html

With glibc-2.5 and gcc-4.1.2 (and gcc-4.2), the 'long double'
data type did change from a 64bit representation to a 128bit
representation on alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390. To allow
partial upgrades of packages, we will need to rename all
packages holding libraries with the long double data type in
their API.  Both libc and libstdc++ do not need to be renamed,
because they support both representations.  We rename the library
packages on all architectures to avoid name mismatches between
architectures (you can avoid the renaming by supporting both
datatype representations in the library as done in glibc and
libstdc++, but unless a library is prepared for that, it does not
seem to be worth the effort).

It is suggested to rename a package libfoo1 to libfoo1ldbl;
please wait with the renaming if the package depends on
another library package which needs renaming.

This package has been indentified as one with header files in
/usr/include matching 'long *double'. Please close this bug report
if it is a false positive, or rename the package accordingly.

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: lam
Source-Version: 7.1.2-1.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lam-mpidoc_7.1.2-1.2_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam-mpidoc_7.1.2-1.2_all.deb
lam-runtime_7.1.2-1.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam-runtime_7.1.2-1.2_i386.deb
lam4-dev_7.1.2-1.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam4-dev_7.1.2-1.2_i386.deb
lam_7.1.2-1.2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam_7.1.2-1.2.diff.gz
lam_7.1.2-1.2.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam_7.1.2-1.2.dsc
liblam4_7.1.2-1.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lam/liblam4_7.1.2-1.2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lam package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:04:48 +0200
Source: lam
Binary: lam-mpidoc lam4-dev liblam4 lam-runtime
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 7.1.2-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 lam-mpidoc - Documentation for the Message Passing Interface standard
 lam-runtime - LAM runtime environment for executing parallel programs
 lam4-dev   - Development of parallel programs using LAM
 liblam4- Shared libraries used by LAM parallel programs
Closes: 418988 430241 456418
Changes: 
 lam (7.1.2-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Upload to unstable
 .
 lam (7.1.2-1.1) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * transition to gfortran, closes: #456418
   * rename package for long double transition, closes: #430241
   * remove pre-depends on stone-age dpkg version
   * remove versioned depends on essential package findutils and debianutils
   * Depend on ssh-client instead of ssh, closes: #418988
   * Edit changelog to get rid of lintian warning on long changelog
Files: 
 63a60aedfa1d639936124dd1a5a0ee0a 659 devel extra lam_7.1.2-1.2.dsc
 fd4efbb90f1bafef033d6916d669c6fa 165846 devel extra lam_7.1.2-1.2.diff.gz
 3fda09ee496ba9dfe5df1a07585a652c 1928358 devel extra 
lam4-dev_7.1.2-1.2_i386.deb
 58920d9676c39934ede38813c94c41da 551592 libs extra liblam4_7.1.2-1.2_i386.deb
 496241589b05506990747158cb8f673e 970284 utils extra 
lam-runtime_7.1.2-1.2_i386.deb
 547264f422a17cf3fb6915b730536c2a 300280 doc extra lam-mpidoc_7.1.2-1.2_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHriNAibPvMsrqrwMRAgqxAKDtjwH/Trdozb7jLSYRg+6gb1WQfQCfSqwJ
KmmiyrY1b1W0xF4KhE4wvnA=
=d86r
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---


Bug#430241: marked as done (ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390)

2008-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:56:55 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#430241: fixed in lam 7.1.2-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: lam4-dev
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: goal-ldbl128

Discussed in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg01173.html

With glibc-2.5 and gcc-4.1.2 (and gcc-4.2), the 'long double'
data type did change from a 64bit representation to a 128bit
representation on alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390. To allow
partial upgrades of packages, we will need to rename all
packages holding libraries with the long double data type in
their API.  Both libc and libstdc++ do not need to be renamed,
because they support both representations.  We rename the library
packages on all architectures to avoid name mismatches between
architectures (you can avoid the renaming by supporting both
datatype representations in the library as done in glibc and
libstdc++, but unless a library is prepared for that, it does not
seem to be worth the effort).

It is suggested to rename a package libfoo1 to libfoo1ldbl;
please wait with the renaming if the package depends on
another library package which needs renaming.

This package has been indentified as one with header files in
/usr/include matching 'long *double'. Please close this bug report
if it is a false positive, or rename the package accordingly.

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: lam
Source-Version: 7.1.2-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lam-mpidoc_7.1.2-1.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam-mpidoc_7.1.2-1.1_all.deb
lam-runtime_7.1.2-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam-runtime_7.1.2-1.1_i386.deb
lam4-dev_7.1.2-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam4-dev_7.1.2-1.1_i386.deb
lam_7.1.2-1.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam_7.1.2-1.1.diff.gz
lam_7.1.2-1.1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lam/lam_7.1.2-1.1.dsc
liblam4_7.1.2-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lam/liblam4_7.1.2-1.1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lam package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:24:19 +0200
Source: lam
Binary: lam-mpidoc lam4-dev liblam4 lam-runtime
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 7.1.2-1.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 lam-mpidoc - Documentation for the Message Passing Interface standard
 lam-runtime - LAM runtime environment for executing parallel programs
 lam4-dev   - Development of parallel programs using LAM
 liblam4- Shared libraries used by LAM parallel programs
Closes: 418988 430241 456418
Changes: 
 lam (7.1.2-1.1) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * transition to gfortran, closes: #456418
   * rename package for long double transition, closes: #430241
   * remove pre-depends on stone-age dpkg version
   * remove versioned depends on essential package findutils and debianutils
   * Depend on ssh-client instead of ssh, closes: #418988
   * Edit changelog to get rid of lintian warning on long changelog
Files: 
 24bf9f179f1a618c8fcea8a79b882d69 659 devel extra lam_7.1.2-1.1.dsc
 516bd68f1110d9426a53b0819bd2c50b 165816 devel extra lam_7.1.2-1.1.diff.gz
 0d4cff5165dbdb10f1a456464058e3df 1929724 devel extra 
lam4-dev_7.1.2-1.1_i386.deb
 c0806a240b1d3c448a42cadaa1735a45 551558 libs extra liblam4_7.1.2-1.1_i386.deb
 99ddaf9d719dd55289a56a93970aa03b 970288 utils extra 
lam-runtime_7.1.2-1.1_i386.deb
 2534d93f5f0b6f5cb485b925db57347e 300234 doc extra lam-mpidoc_7.1.2-1.1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHoEm0ibPvMsrqrwMRAj6RAJ9FF7wTTS1vP75bLNtpxwRCXF5jxACg9Apk
skwQXyo6GL8gMA4SRB0nZbk=
=BASQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---