Bug#431672: Bug#431671: Bug#400742: Bug#431671: piuparts test: fails to install: line 43: update-updmap: command not found

2007-07-04 Thread Rene Engelhard 
Hi,

Norbert Preining wrote:
 Please check before setting wrong severity levels, or even better check
 yourself!
 
 This is a bug in texpower packaging, it should call dh_installtex ONLY
 for the texpower and not for the texpower-manual package. As with ALL
 dh_ scripts there are -p -A etc options.

Yes, there are. And for most dh_ stuff the dh_ scripts *do* figure out
that they don't have do do stuff on package foo (like if package foo has
no .menu you don't need to add the menu stuff). Even dh_pycentral does
that...

 And texpower (bin) packages *HAS* tex files so needs tex-common.

Yes, but neither has texpower-manual nor -examples.

   dh_installtex -p texpower
 
 fixes this, I have tried it myself.

I know that this is possible, I'd call this a workaround, though.

Gr��e/Regards,

Ren�
-- 
 .''`.  Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#431672: Bug#431671: Bug#400742: Bug#431671: piuparts test: fails to install: line 43: update-updmap: command not found

2007-07-04 Thread Norbert Preining 
retitle 400742 dh_installtex should check the existence for tex file
tags 400742 - wontfix
thanks

On Mit, 04 Jul 2007, Rene Engelhard wrote:
 Yes, there are. And for most dh_ stuff the dh_ scripts *do* figure out
 that they don't have do do stuff on package foo (like if package foo has
 no .menu you don't need to add the menu stuff). Even dh_pycentral does
 that...

Ok, I retitled the bug and removed the wontfix stuff. If I find time I
will implement it.

  dh_installtex -p texpower
 
 I know that this is possible, I'd call this a workaround, though.

The man page prominently specify:
   Your package should depend on an appropriate version of tex-common so
   that the update-* commands are available. (This program adds that
   dependency to ${misc:Depends}.)

Furthermore, if someone uploads a package without trying to build it
himself in a clean pbuilder/cowbuilder/sbuild/whatever  

Best wishes

Norbert

---
Dr. Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED]Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094  fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
---
SAVERNAKE (vb.)
To sew municipal crests on to a windcheater in the belief that this
will make the wearer appear cosmopolitan.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#431672: Bug#431671: Bug#400742: Bug#431671: piuparts test: fails to install: line 43: update-updmap: command not found

2007-07-04 Thread Rene Engelhard 
Hi,

Norbert Preining wrote:
 On Mit, 04 Jul 2007, Rene Engelhard wrote:
  Yes, there are. And for most dh_ stuff the dh_ scripts *do* figure out
  that they don't have do do stuff on package foo (like if package foo has
  no .menu you don't need to add the menu stuff). Even dh_pycentral does
  that...
 
 Ok, I retitled the bug and removed the wontfix stuff. If I find time I
 will implement it.

Thanks.

(I just added the workaround as that's needed now...)

 dh_installtex -p texpower
  
  I know that this is possible, I'd call this a workaround, though.
 
 The man page prominently specify:
Your package should depend on an appropriate version of tex-common so
that the update-* commands are available. (This program adds that
dependency to ${misc:Depends}.)

I didn't deny that. Why are you citing this? I know that misc:Depends
should be there, that's why it is for texpower. Just not for
the -examples and -manual packages as those don't have any tex files and
I trusted dh_installtex to behave like the other dh_ stuff..

 Furthermore, if someone uploads a package without trying to build it
 himself in a clean pbuilder/cowbuilder/sbuild/whatever  

Yes, but that's *completely* unrelated to the issue at hand. Building
in a sbuild didn't prevent anything mentioned here from happening. Of
course, you can blame me for not running piuparts, but...

Gr��e/Regards,

Ren�
-- 
 .''`.  Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#431672: Bug#431671: Bug#400742: Bug#431671: piuparts test: fails to install: line 43: update-updmap: command not found

2007-07-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
On 04/07/07 at 13:00 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
 Ofcourse, you can blame me for not running piuparts, but...

but nobody runs piuparts? ;)
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature