Bug#488895: marked as done (please move to main)

2008-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:20:47 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#488895: fixed in lucene2 2.3.2+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #488895,
regarding please move to main
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
488895: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488895
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: liblucene2-java
Version: 2.3.1+ds1-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

please move liblucene2-java to main. OpenOffice.org 3.0 needs it since
development milestone m22 for help indexing.

As far as I can (publically) see the need for contrib arises because it
uses libdb-je-java. Can it be disabled again, please?

Michael Koch tells me, though, that lucene had some various other
problems with java-gcj-compat and that it's therefore not in main, at
least for OOos build process it does work, though (builds fine and the
help building indexing runs through - didn't check the result/runtime
yet, though). This is with lucene 2.3.2, though.

Anyway, even if the internal lucene worked I don't really like using a
unpatched internal version of lucene - but we better should use the
normal one.

I am filing this bug for reference.

Regards,

Rene

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages liblucene2-java depends on:
ii  libcommons-beanutils-jav 1.8.0~beta-1utility for manipulating JavaBeans
ii  libcommons-collections3- 3.2.1-1 A set of abstract data type interf
ii  libcommons-digester-java 1.8-1   Rule based XML Java object mapping
ii  libcommons-logging-java  1.1.1-1 commmon wrapper interface for seve
ii  libdb-je-java3.2.68-1Oracle Berkeley Database Java Edit
ii  libdb4.5-java4.5.20-12   Berkeley v4.5 Database Libraries f
ii  libjline-java0.9.94-1Java library for handling console 
ii  libjtidy-java7+svn20070309-2 a Java port of HTML Tidy, a HTML s
ii  libregexp-java   1.4-4   regular expression library for Jav
ii  sun-java6-jre6-06-1  Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment (

liblucene2-java recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: lucene2
Source-Version: 2.3.2+ds1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lucene2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

liblucene2-java-doc_2.3.2+ds1-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lucene2/liblucene2-java-doc_2.3.2+ds1-1_all.deb
liblucene2-java_2.3.2+ds1-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lucene2/liblucene2-java_2.3.2+ds1-1_all.deb
lucene2_2.3.2+ds1-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/lucene2/lucene2_2.3.2+ds1-1.diff.gz
lucene2_2.3.2+ds1-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lucene2/lucene2_2.3.2+ds1-1.dsc
lucene2_2.3.2+ds1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/lucene2/lucene2_2.3.2+ds1.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jan-Pascal van Best [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lucene2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:57:05 +0200
Source: lucene2
Binary: liblucene2-java liblucene2-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3.2+ds1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jan-Pascal van Best [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 liblucene2-java - Full-text search engine library for Java(TM)
 liblucene2-java-doc - Documentation for Lucene
Closes: 488895
Changes: 
 lucene2 (2.3.2+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Use openjdk to build lucene2, move to main (Closes: #488895)
   * Update TODO.Debian to reflect move to openjdk
   * Update README.Debian to reflect inclusion of bdb-je (in 2.3.0+ds1-1)
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.0
   * Update debian/copyright to refer to the text of the Apache license in
 /usr/share/common

Bug#488895:

2008-07-25 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
 But that said, openjdk entered Debian now (yay!).
 

 Good.  Lucene2 can be moved to main with a build-depends on OpenJDK.
 Who's got the energy to do it? :)
   
I've checked and lucene2 builds with OpenJDK (and passes all tests :-).
Updates are in svn, I'm preparing an upload now.

Jan-Pascal




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#488895:

2008-07-21 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
But that said, openjdk entered Debian now (yay!).

Good.  Lucene2 can be moved to main with a build-depends on OpenJDK.
Who's got the energy to do it? :)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#488895: please move to main

2008-07-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi,

Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
 But seriously, what's the ETA for Sun Java to enter main? Fedora is
 already shipping it, right?

That doesn't say anything, we all know that other distributions are
sloppy with license issues.

But that said, openjdk entered Debian now (yay!).

But *if* you move lucene2 to main, pleae DO NOT depend on openjdk. Would
make people having it installed besides java-gcj-compat when they want
it/need it becasue OpenJDK is not available. And some stuff of lucene
(like the OOo things) seem to work with java-gcj-compat..

Regards,

Rene



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#488895: please move to main

2008-07-11 Thread Dalibor Topic

Jeff Breidenbach wrote:

But seriously, what's the ETA for Sun Java to enter main?
It's stuck in the new queue atm: 
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/openjdk-6_6b10dfsg-1.html .



 Fedora is
already shipping it, right?
  

Yes.

cheers,
dalibor topic

--
***
Dalibor Topic   Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador   AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH   Mobile: (+49 177) 2664 192
Nagelsweg 55http://openjdk.java.net
D-20097 Hamburg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht München: HRB 161028
Geschäftsführer: Thomas Schröder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Bömer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Häring




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#488895: please move to main

2008-07-10 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
When we went through this for Lucene 1.4.3, the trick was to compile
under main, and then make sure the regression tests passed if Sun Java
was installed. That way we knew the package was ok to ship and the
problems were all in the runtime.

But seriously, what's the ETA for Sun Java to enter main? Fedora is
already shipping it, right?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#488895: please move to main

2008-07-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 488895 serious
Bug#488895: please move to main
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'

 tag 488895 + lenny-ignore
Bug#488895: please move to main
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny-ignore

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#488895: please move to main

2008-07-02 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
 As far as I can (publically) see the need for contrib arises because it
 uses libdb-je-java.
The main reason is that lucene2 fails a number of unit tests when running
with java-gcj-compat, e.g. for the indexing of dates. See bug #468334.
This has been deemed serious enough to put lucene2 into contrib.

What I thinks needs to be done is look into the unit test failures more
closely, try to isolate java-gcj-compat bugs (or at least
incompatibilities with sun-java5/6) and try to have those bugs resolved.
Unfortunately, that will be quite a bit of work which I don't have time
for now.

I'm a bit reluctant to move lucene2 into main while we know it doesn't
work properly with java-gcj-compat, but I'll let Michael overrule me...

Cheers

Jan-Pascal





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]