Bug#492009: eekboek: should not be shipped with lenny

[Joost van Baal]

Hi Martin,

Op Sun 27 Jul 2008 om 05:09:45 -0700 schreef Martin Michlmayr:
 * Joost van Baal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-23 09:50]:
  eekboek's first upload to the Debian archive (which was 1.03.90-2) has
  just happened.  The Debian package has not received enough testing by
  enough users to make it fit for a stable release, imho.
 
 This was uploaded to experimental rather than unstable, so why do you
 need this bug report?

1.03.90-2 was uploaded to unstable, not experimental.  That's why I
opened the bug.  Later, 1.03.90-3 was uploaded to experimental (I was
misled by this bug getting closed).  Both are still in new.

I'd like to get eekboek shipped with lenny+1, without disturbing the
lenny release process.

Thanks for your help, Bye,

Joost



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#492009: eekboek: should not be shipped with lenny

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Joost van Baal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-23 09:50]:
 eekboek's first upload to the Debian archive (which was 1.03.90-2) has
 just happened.  The Debian package has not received enough testing by
 enough users to make it fit for a stable release, imho.

This was uploaded to experimental rather than unstable, so why do you
need this bug report?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#492009: eekboek: should not be shipped with lenny

[Joost van Baal]

Package: eekboek
Version: 1.03.90-2
Severity: serious

Hi,

eekboek's first upload to the Debian archive (which was 1.03.90-2) has
just happened.  The Debian package has not received enough testing by
enough users to make it fit for a stable release, imho.

Please don't ship it with lenny.

Thanks, Bye,

Joost



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature