Bug#529840: neon26: FTBFS against gnutls26 = 2.7.x
tags 529840 -patch thanks The proposed patch is applied against an autogenerated configure script. This should be fixed in the source. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#529840: neon26: FTBFS against gnutls26 = 2.7.x
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 529840 + patch Bug #529840 [neon26] neon26: FTBFS against gnutls26 = 2.7.x Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#529840: No FTBFS?
On 2009-08-18 Kumar Appaiah a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in wrote: [...] For the time being, instead of regenerating the configure file, I have just patched it in a very simple way, and have verified that it cures the FTBFS. Thanks, and sorry for making you rebuild the package due to an error on my part. :-) No worries. Thank you for taking care. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#529840: No FTBFS?
On 2009-08-18 Kumar Appaiah a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in wrote: The package (neon36) actually seems to build, since SSL presence doesn't check for gnutls, if I am right. Could you please build the package and confirm this for me if you ca? Hej, it still fails for me. Buildlog attached. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' dpkg-buildpackage: set CFLAGS to default value: -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: set CPPFLAGS to default value: dpkg-buildpackage: set LDFLAGS to default value: dpkg-buildpackage: set FFLAGS to default value: -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: set CXXFLAGS to default value: -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: source package neon26 dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.26.4-2+b1 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Andreas Metzler ametz...@debian.org dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture i386 fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-openssl build-gnutls install-openssl install-gnutls \ macros/changelog.m4 rm -f patch-stamp rm -f config.sub config.guess rm -rf /tmp/NEON/neon26-0.26.4/debian/build-tree/ [ ! -f Makefile ] || /usr/bin/make distclean rm -rf Makefile src/Makefile test/Makefile config.h config.cache config.log config.status rm -rf libtool neon-config src/.libs src/*.o dh_clean dpkg-source -b neon26-0.26.4 dpkg-source: info: using source format `1.0' dpkg-source: info: building neon26 using existing neon26_0.26.4.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: building neon26 in neon26_0.26.4-2+b1.diff.gz dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file config.guess dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file config.sub dpkg-source: info: building neon26 in neon26_0.26.4-2+b1.dsc debian/rules build cp /usr/share/misc/config.guess \ /usr/share/misc/config.sub \ ./ install -d /tmp/NEON/neon26-0.26.4/debian/build-tree//neon-openssl cd /tmp/NEON/neon26-0.26.4/debian/build-tree//neon-openssl/ \ CFLAGS=-O2 -g /tmp/NEON/neon26-0.26.4/configure --enable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --enable-threadsafe-ssl=posix --with-gssapi --with-libxml2 \ --with-ssl=openssl checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed checking for egrep... grep -E checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... yes checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking dlfcn.h usability... yes checking dlfcn.h presence... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for g++... g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E checking for g77... no checking for f77... no checking for xlf... no checking for frt... no checking for pgf77... no checking for fort77... no checking for fl32... no checking for af77... no checking for f90... no checking for xlf90... no checking for pgf90... no checking for epcf90... no checking for f95... no checking for fort... no checking for xlf95... no checking for ifc... no checking for efc... no checking for pgf95... no checking for lf95... no checking for gfortran... no checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no checking whether accepts -g... no checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 32768 checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object... ok checking for objdir... .libs checking for ar... ar checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for strip... strip checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld -m elf_i386)
Bug#529840: No FTBFS?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:19:03PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2009-08-18 Kumar Appaiah a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in wrote: The package (neon36) actually seems to build, since SSL presence doesn't check for gnutls, if I am right. Could you please build the package and confirm this for me if you ca? Hej, it still fails for me. Buildlog attached. My bad. Sorry for missing this. I'll try to figure out a way to avoid this tonight. Thanks. Kumar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#529840: No FTBFS?
tags 529840 + patch
thanks
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:05:18PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hej,
it still fails for me. Buildlog attached.
My bad. Sorry for missing this.
I'll try to figure out a way to avoid this tonight.
Dear Andreas,
For the time being, instead of regenerating the configure file, I have
just patched it in a very simple way, and have verified that it cures
the FTBFS.
Thanks, and sorry for making you rebuild the package due to an error
on my part. :-)
HTH.
Kumar
diff -Nru --exclude changelog neon26-0.26.4/configure neon26-0.26.4/configure
--- neon26-0.26.4/configure 2009-08-18 13:41:36.0 -0500
+++ neon26-0.26.4/configure 2009-08-18 13:41:37.0 -0500
@@ -27752,13 +27752,14 @@
fi
- if test $GNUTLS_CONFIG = no; then
- { { echo $as_me:$LINENO: error: could not find libgnutls-config in \$PATH 5
-echo $as_me: error: could not find libgnutls-config in \$PATH 2;}
- { (exit 1); exit 1; }; }
- fi
+# if test $GNUTLS_CONFIG = no; then
+# { { echo $as_me:$LINENO: error: could not find libgnutls-config in \$PATH 5
+#echo $as_me: error: could not find libgnutls-config in \$PATH 2;}
+# { (exit 1); exit 1; }; }
+# fi
- ne_gnutls_ver=`$GNUTLS_CONFIG --version`
+ GNUTLS_CONFIG=pkg-config gnutls
+ ne_gnutls_ver=`$GNUTLS_CONFIG --modversion`
case $ne_gnutls_ver in
1.0.?|1.0.1?|1.0.20|1.0.21)
{ { echo $as_me:$LINENO: error: GNU TLS version $ne_gnutls_ver is too old -- 1.0.22 or later required 5
diff -Nru --exclude changelog neon26-0.26.4/debian/control neon26-0.26.4/debian/control
--- neon26-0.26.4/debian/control 2009-08-18 13:41:36.0 -0500
+++ neon26-0.26.4/debian/control 2009-08-18 13:41:37.0 -0500
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: net
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) g...@debian.hu
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), libxml2-dev, libssl-dev (= 0.9.8c-1), libgnutls-dev (= 1.0.22), libkrb5-dev, libz-dev, autotools-dev, binutils (= 2.14.90.0.7)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), libxml2-dev, libssl-dev (= 0.9.8c-1), libgnutls-dev (= 1.0.22), libkrb5-dev, libz-dev, autotools-dev, binutils (= 2.14.90.0.7), pkg-config
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
Package: libneon26
Processed: Re: Bug#529840: No FTBFS?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 529840 + patch Bug #529840 [neon26] neon26: FTBFS against gnutls26 = 2.7.x Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#529840: No FTBFS?
Hi! The package (neon36) actually seems to build, since SSL presence doesn't check for gnutls, if I am right. Could you please build the package and confirm this for me if you ca? Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah signature.asc Description: Digital signature
