Bug#559352: is it still worth holding the bug open at grave level?

2010-09-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
it was reported against elderly now iceowl/0.8-6

current in lenny 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1

Sebastian has confirmed that he could start 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1 (on
mipsel?) without problems, so problems seems not to be grave imho in the
light of Release-Criticality 

-- 
  .-.
=--   /v\  =
Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko  /(   )\   ICQ#: 60653192
   Linux User^^-^^[17]




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#559352: is it still worth holding the bug open at grave level?

2010-09-22 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Yaroslav Halchenko | 2010-09-22 10:20:07 [-0400]:

it was reported against elderly now iceowl/0.8-6

current in lenny 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1
You want to double check this? According to PTS stable is still 0.8-6.

Sebastian has confirmed that he could start 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1 (on
mipsel?) without problems, so problems seems not to be grave imho in the
light of Release-Criticality 

Yes, I tested it on mipsel. It is still not working on Lenny [0] so it
is unusable and it matches grave. The maintainer could close it in
unstable if he trusts me with this information so it will not remain
release critical for Squeeze.

[0] haven't check this but we have the bug report against the same
version which is in Lenny.

Sebastian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#559352: is it still worth holding the bug open at grave level?

2010-09-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
 current in lenny 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1
 You want to double check this? According to PTS stable is still 0.8-6.
oops - sorry, I meant squeeze ;-)  bug indeed might still be present in
lenny (and could be tagged as such I guess)

 Yes, I tested it on mipsel. It is still not working on Lenny [0] so it
 is unusable and it matches grave. The maintainer could close it in
 unstable if he trusts me with this information so it will not remain
 release critical for Squeeze.
yeap -- that was my goal -- removing it from the list of squeeze-RC ones

-- 
  .-.
=--   /v\  =
Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko  /(   )\   ICQ#: 60653192
   Linux User^^-^^[17]





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#559352: is it still worth holding the bug open at grave level?

2010-09-22 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Yaroslav Halchenko | 2010-09-22 12:09:42 [-0400]:

 Yes, I tested it on mipsel. It is still not working on Lenny [0] so it
 is unusable and it matches grave. The maintainer could close it in
 unstable if he trusts me with this information so it will not remain
 release critical for Squeeze.
yeap -- that was my goal -- removing it from the list of squeeze-RC ones
No tag required. Once the maintainer closes it with a version in testing
then in will disappear from the Squeeze radar.

Sebastian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org