Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)
Hi, sorry for late replay. Lot of private work ;) From my side it was all ok. Thanks for the work! regards, Frank Am 30.11.2010 16:25, schrieb Didier 'OdyX' Raboud: Le Tuesday 23 November 2010 13:15:50 Frank Habermann, vous avez écrit : I have contacted moxiecode. The answer for the flv_player.swf is: It was never implemented. We are working on implementing it now though. So i think both files can be removed. regards, Frank Hi Frank, I prepared an NMU for this bug (a simple repack without the two files), and I'm just waiting on one of my usual sponsors to pick it up. http://alioth.debian.org/~odyx-guest/debian/unstable/tinymce_3.3.8+dfsg0-0.1.dsc ^ What do you think ? Can we proceed (to DELAYED/2 e.g.) ? Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)
Le Tuesday 23 November 2010 13:15:50 Frank Habermann, vous avez écrit : I have contacted moxiecode. The answer for the flv_player.swf is: It was never implemented. We are working on implementing it now though. So i think both files can be removed. regards, Frank Hi Frank, I prepared an NMU for this bug (a simple repack without the two files), and I'm just waiting on one of my usual sponsors to pick it up. http://alioth.debian.org/~odyx-guest/debian/unstable/tinymce_3.3.8+dfsg0-0.1.dsc ^ What do you think ? Can we proceed (to DELAYED/2 e.g.) ? Cheers, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM). CH-1020 Renens did...@raboud.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)
Hi, $ find . -name *swf* ./jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/media/img/flv_player.swf ./examples/media/sample.swf How important are those files? Could those be replaced or removed without affecting application functionality? I found nothing about using the flv_player.swf in sources. Seems to be obsolete. The sample.swf is only a flash file with the logo of moxiecode. This file is used for a sample flash insert. But it has no functionality. So i think both files can be removed but i will try to contact moxiecode to clear that. I have contacted moxiecode. The answer for the flv_player.swf is: It was never implemented. We are working on implementing it now though. So i think both files can be removed. regards, Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)
Hi, $ find . -name *swf* ./jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/media/img/flv_player.swf ./examples/media/sample.swf How important are those files? Could those be replaced or removed without affecting application functionality? I found nothing about using the flv_player.swf in sources. Seems to be obsolete. The sample.swf is only a flash file with the logo of moxiecode. This file is used for a sample flash insert. But it has no functionality. So i think both files can be removed but i will try to contact moxiecode to clear that. regards, Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)
Hello, On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:35:53PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: If I understand it correctly, it's just a plugin of tinymce in need of that flash player? Then couldn't that plugin be moved to non-free (in a sepperate source package) so that a tinymce cleaned from this plugin could stay in main as well as the other packages? $ find . -name *swf* ./jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/media/img/flv_player.swf ./examples/media/sample.swf How important are those files? Could those be replaced or removed without affecting application functionality? Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)
flvplayer's website[1] was updated with a licence: I get a few questions about what kind of license this player is released under. I donŽt know, really. You can do pretty much whatever the hell you want with it as far as IŽm concerned ;) So use it for whatever, redistribute it, etc. As long as you donŽt try to profit from/sell it in any way, itŽs probably fine. If you are unsure, just drop me a quick email. So, this is clearly non-free (you can't sell it), but distributable. Maybe this is enough to let us move tinymce to non-free and close this bug? [1] http://oos.moxiecode.com/flvplayer/ -- Marcos Marado -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)
Hi! Am 11.11.2010 16:11, schrieb Marcos Marado: flvplayer's website[1] was updated with a licence: I get a few questions about what kind of license this player is released under. I donŽt know, really. You can do pretty much whatever the hell you want with it as far as IŽm concerned ;) So use it for whatever, redistribute it, etc. As long as you donŽt try to profit from/sell it in any way, itŽs probably fine. If you are unsure, just drop me a quick email. So, this is clearly non-free (you can't sell it), but distributable. Maybe this is enough to let us move tinymce to non-free and close this bug? [1] http://oos.moxiecode.com/flvplayer/ Yes, that makes it distributable for us, however: $ apt-cache rdepends tinymce tinymce Reverse Depends: webgui citadel-webcit mahara horde3 wordpress libwt21 citadel-webcit roundcube-core python-django-tinymce knowledgeroot horde3 These packages would then need to be moved to contrib... If I understand it correctly, it's just a plugin of tinymce in need of that flash player? Then couldn't that plugin be moved to non-free (in a sepperate source package) so that a tinymce cleaned from this plugin could stay in main as well as the other packages? Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)
On 2010-11-11 at 16:35:53, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: If I understand it correctly, it's just a plugin of tinymce in need of that flash player? Then couldn't that plugin be moved to non-free (in a sepperate source package) so that a tinymce cleaned from this plugin could stay in main as well as the other packages? What we've done upstream for Mahara is that we've removed the media player from the tinymce source we bundle with Mahara. I suspect that a number of the other rdeps might be fine with that if they don't use that part of tinymce. Moving tinymce to nonfree would likely cause the mahara package to start using its own flvplayer-free bundled copy again which would be sub-optimal from a security standpoint. Has anybody tried to get tinymce to remove flvplayer upstream? Cheers, Francois -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
