Bug#631048: FTBFS against iceweasel 4.0 or 5.0
Hello, On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: I'm planning on a push to unstable of iceweasel/xulrunner 5.0 on the 15th of July. Please update your packages by then. ---end quoted text--- If upstream of SWT didn't fix the FTBFS against xulrunner2 by 15th of July, then I will upload swt-gtk with the mozilla build disabled. -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#631048: FTBFS against iceweasel 4.0 or 5.0
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:03:17AM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: Hello, On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: I'm planning on a push to unstable of iceweasel/xulrunner 5.0 on the 15th of July. Please update your packages by then. ---end quoted text--- If upstream of SWT didn't fix the FTBFS against xulrunner2 by 15th of July, then I will upload swt-gtk with the mozilla build disabled. As I understand it, swt-gtk uses webkit by default, now, so you should probably switch to webkit. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#631048: FTBFS against iceweasel 4.0 or 5.0
On 2011-07-07 09:18, Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:03:17AM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: Hello, On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: I'm planning on a push to unstable of iceweasel/xulrunner 5.0 on the 15th of July. Please update your packages by then. ---end quoted text--- If upstream of SWT didn't fix the FTBFS against xulrunner2 by 15th of July, then I will upload swt-gtk with the mozilla build disabled. As I understand it, swt-gtk uses webkit by default, now, so you should probably switch to webkit. Mike From what I have heard, it does use webkit by default, but in 3.6 the webkit setup had some issues (not sure here though). I heard the 3.7 support should be better. As for xulrunner 2.0 support, then I heard that is very unlikely. For the eclipse package I am definitely not expecting anything, especially after I had a chat with a Fedora developer, who tried to do the actual porting for Fedora. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#631048: FTBFS against iceweasel 4.0 or 5.0
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 08:53:55PM +0200, jcris...@debian.org wrote: Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: pkg-mozilla-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: xulrunner-2.0 Hi, your package fails to build against iceweasel 4.0 (currently in experimental). iceweasel 5.0 will soon be uploaded to unstable, so your package needs to be updated to cope with the new version, or will have to be removed. Build logs are available at http://people.debian.org/~glandium/iceweasel4-transition.logs.tbz2 I'm planning on a push to unstable of iceweasel/xulrunner 5.0 on the 15th of July. Please update your packages by then. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
