Bug#632240: pylucene status
Dmitry, Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term, if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as tomorrow. Let me know.
Bug#632240: pylucene status
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 06:19:25PM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: Dmitry, Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term, if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as tomorrow. Let me know. Hi, Sure. If you have some time to review/upload it, it'll be very helpful. Here are URL's to package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pylucene dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pylucene/pylucene_3.5.0-1.dsc RFS bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670204 New upstream version (3.6) was released a few days ago. I'll be able to test updated package only next week. So for now I prefer to see v3.5.0 in debian. Thanks a lot -- WBR, Dmitry signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#632240: pylucene status
On 20.04.2012 17:16, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:50:24AM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: You can package a modern pylucene and take over as the maintainer. Nothing would make me happier. Thanks a lot! I'll try to do this Any news on that? I'm looking at old FTBFS issues as part of the York BSP and right now pyluence looks like an RM candidate. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#632240: pylucene status
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 03:00:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 20.04.2012 17:16, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:50:24AM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: You can package a modern pylucene and take over as the maintainer. Nothing would make me happier. Thanks a lot! I'll try to do this Any news on that? I'm looking at old FTBFS issues as part of the York BSP and right now pyluence looks like an RM candidate. Hi, I'm very motivated to support this package since it's optional dependency of ReviewBoard package. I'm not DD so can't upload it. That's why I've uploaded new version of pylucene to mentors and looking for sponsor: Bug#670204: RFS: pylucene/3.5.0-1 ITA -- Python extension for accessing Java Lucene Holger Levsen will probably take a look to it in a week. He is on a vacation now but proposed sponsorship for reviewboard in it's ITP. -- WBR, Dmitry signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#632240: pylucene status
Hi, I'm looking to pylucene package that I need as a dependency for other pkg. Unfortunately currently it still depends on Python 2.5 so can't be installed at all. Bugreport about this was filled almost a year ago (#632240). Looks like the latest information from Jeff (current maintainer) was in 2010 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518623#10): This version of PyLucene is old (depends on gcj) and new versions will require a reworked package. Not worth patching this up. Help with packaging a new PyLucene appreciated. How this should be handled? I can create new ITP report for python-lucene package. Any other suggestions? -- WBR, Dmitry signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#632240: pylucene status
You can package a modern pylucene and take over as the maintainer. Nothing would make me happier. On Apr 20, 2012 6:21 AM, Dmitry Nezhevenko d...@dion.org.ua wrote: Hi, I'm looking to pylucene package that I need as a dependency for other pkg. Unfortunately currently it still depends on Python 2.5 so can't be installed at all. Bugreport about this was filled almost a year ago (#632240). Looks like the latest information from Jeff (current maintainer) was in 2010 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518623#10): This version of PyLucene is old (depends on gcj) and new versions will require a reworked package. Not worth patching this up. Help with packaging a new PyLucene appreciated. How this should be handled? I can create new ITP report for python-lucene package. Any other suggestions? -- WBR, Dmitry
Bug#632240: pylucene status
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:50:24AM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: You can package a modern pylucene and take over as the maintainer. Nothing would make me happier. Thanks a lot! I'll try to do this -- WBR, Dmitry signature.asc Description: Digital signature
