Bug#649458: simulavr FTBFS on armel

2011-12-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:02:40 +, Peter Green wrote:

 Package: simulavr
 Version: 0.1.2.2-6.2
 Severity: serious
 Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
 
 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=simulavrarch=armelver=0.1.2.2-6.2stamp=1319642506

Interestingly the package built on armel 2 days ago:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=simulavrarch=armelver=0.1.2.2-6.2stamp=1324945016

and it needed also 2 attempts on armhf:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=simulavrver=0.1.2.2-6.2

Any idea what's going on and if your patch is still needed?
 
Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin,  developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Cat Stevens: Trouble


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#649458: simulavr FTBFS on armel

2011-12-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:05:56 +, peter green wrote:

 Interestingly the package built on armel 2 days ago:
 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=simulavrarch=armelver=0.1.2.2-6.2stamp=1324945016
 Any idea what's going on and if your patch is still needed?
 The issue has now been fixed on the glibc side (after about the
 third or fourth package I ran into with this issue I decided that
 solving the bug from that end may be a better idea).

Ah, I see.
Thanks for the info!
 

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin,  developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Beatles


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#649458: simulavr FTBFS on armel

2011-12-04 Thread peter green

tags 649458 +patch
found 649458 0.1.2.2-6.1
thanks

This bug also affects the version in testing.

I have attatched a patch that fixes the issue (the issue appears to be a 
name conflict, the patch just renames the union in question).
Only in simulavr-0.1.2.2: simulavr.spec
diff -ur simulavr-0.1.2.2/src/disp/disp.c simulavr-0.1.2.2.new/src/disp/disp.c
--- simulavr-0.1.2.2/src/disp/disp.c	2011-12-04 13:30:12.0 +
+++ simulavr-0.1.2.2.new/src/disp/disp.c	2011-12-04 13:14:46.0 +
@@ -90,13 +90,13 @@
 unsigned int zreg = 0;
 unsigned int spreg = 0;
 
-union fp_reg
+union simulavr_fp_reg
 {
 float fval;
 unsigned char ival[4];
 };
 
-union fp_reg fp_regs[3];
+union simulavr_fp_reg fp_regs[3];
 
 struct SRAM
 {
diff -ur simulavr-0.1.2.2/src/disp-vcd/disp.c simulavr-0.1.2.2.new/src/disp-vcd/disp.c
--- simulavr-0.1.2.2/src/disp-vcd/disp.c	2011-12-04 13:30:12.0 +
+++ simulavr-0.1.2.2.new/src/disp-vcd/disp.c	2011-12-04 13:19:29.0 +
@@ -79,13 +79,13 @@
 unsigned int zreg = 0;
 unsigned int spreg = 0;
 
-union fp_reg
+union simulavr_fp_reg
 {
 float fval;
 unsigned char ival[4];
 };
 
-union fp_reg fp_regs[3];
+union simulavr_fp_reg fp_regs[3];
 
 struct SRAM
 {


Processed: Re: Bug#649458: simulavr FTBFS on armel

2011-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 649458 +patch
Bug #649458 [simulavr] simulavr FTBFS on armel
Added tag(s) patch.
 found 649458 0.1.2.2-6.1
Bug #649458 [simulavr] simulavr FTBFS on armel
Bug Marked as found in versions simulavr/0.1.2.2-6.1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
649458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649458
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#649458: simulavr FTBFS on armel

2011-11-20 Thread Peter Green
Package: simulavr
Version: 0.1.2.2-6.2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=simulavrarch=armelver=0.1.2.2-6.2stamp=1319642506

make[4]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd-simulavr_0.1.2.2-6.2-armel-7_ZUqo/simulavr-0.1.2.2/src/disp'
if arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src-Wall -Winline 
-Werror -I../../src -I../../src/getopt -Wall -g -O2 -MT disp.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/disp.Tpo -c -o disp.o disp.c; \
then mv -f .deps/disp.Tpo .deps/disp.Po; else rm -f 
.deps/disp.Tpo; exit 1; fi
disp.c:94:1: error: 'fp_reg' defined as wrong kind of tag
make[4]: *** [disp.o] Error 1

I have just reproduced the problem in an up to date sid.

All other architectures except mipsel have built the package successfully.
Mipsel is still waiting for gcc-avr to be uploaded.

ccing the armel porters in case they have an idea on this, I may take a closer
look myself later.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: armel (armv7l)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.39.2-x2 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org