Bug#745444: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#745444: Bug#745444: antpm: FTBFS: antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory
I'll fix it as soon as my travels are over! On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.orgwrote: Quoting Aaron M. Ucko (u...@debian.org): Source: antpm Version: 1.16-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of antpm explicitly targetting only its architecture-dependent binary packages (as on the autobuilders, or with debuild -B or the like) have been failing, even though those are in fact its only binary packages: dh_installman -a debian/antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 130. make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 The problem appears to be that a handful of important commands appear only in the build target, which such builds skip. I'd suggest either moving those commands to the override_dh_install target, which should run in time, or renaming build to build-arch and having build depend on build-arch. Thanks for the report and analysis, Aaron. Kristof, can you check this? My suggestion would be using the first option (moving to override_dh_install) which makes more sense than renaming buildas the commands run in the build target are not exactly build commands. ___ Pkg-running-devel mailing list pkg-running-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-running-devel -- RALOVICH, Kristof PhD candidate Computer Aided Medical Procedures Technical University Munich http://campar.in.tum.de/Main/KristofRalovich Fax: 00 49 89 289 17059
Bug#745444: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#745444: Bug#745444: Bug#745444: antpm: FTBFS: antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory
On 04/24/2014 12:00 PM, Kristof Ralovich wrote: I'll fix it as soon as my travels are over! On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org mailto:bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Aaron M. Ucko (u...@debian.org mailto:u...@debian.org): Source: antpm Version: 1.16-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of antpm explicitly targetting only its architecture-dependent binary packages (as on the autobuilders, or with debuild -B or the like) have been failing, even though those are in fact its only binary packages: dh_installman -a debian/antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 130. make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 The problem appears to be that a handful of important commands appear only in the build target, which such builds skip. I'd suggest either moving those commands to the override_dh_install target, which should run in time, or renaming build to build-arch and having build depend on build-arch. Thanks for the report and analysis, Aaron. Kristof, can you check this? My suggestion would be using the first option (moving to override_dh_install) which makes more sense than renaming buildas the commands run in the build target are not exactly build commands. Christian, could you upload 1.16-3? It works on my machine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745444: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#745444: antpm: FTBFS: antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory
Quoting Aaron M. Ucko (u...@debian.org): Source: antpm Version: 1.16-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of antpm explicitly targetting only its architecture-dependent binary packages (as on the autobuilders, or with debuild -B or the like) have been failing, even though those are in fact its only binary packages: dh_installman -a debian/antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 130. make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 The problem appears to be that a handful of important commands appear only in the build target, which such builds skip. I'd suggest either moving those commands to the override_dh_install target, which should run in time, or renaming build to build-arch and having build depend on build-arch. Thanks for the report and analysis, Aaron. Kristof, can you check this? My suggestion would be using the first option (moving to override_dh_install) which makes more sense than renaming buildas the commands run in the build target are not exactly build commands. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745444: antpm: FTBFS: antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory
Source: antpm Version: 1.16-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of antpm explicitly targetting only its architecture-dependent binary packages (as on the autobuilders, or with debuild -B or the like) have been failing, even though those are in fact its only binary packages: dh_installman -a debian/antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 130. make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 The problem appears to be that a handful of important commands appear only in the build target, which such builds skip. I'd suggest either moving those commands to the override_dh_install target, which should run in time, or renaming build to build-arch and having build depend on build-arch. Could you please take a look? Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
