Bug#745877: lintian: Unreasonable performance of detect_privacy_breach for clhep-doc/2.1.3.1-1/all
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: On 2014-06-17 22:18, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: [...] The files-check of libgcj-doc in 2.5.22.1 has a runtime of 1356s - that is 22 minutes! Even with our partial fix in the master branch, it is /only/ reduced to 605s or ~10 minutes! Ok what do you expect reasonable ? Bastien [...] Honestly, for the given case, I would personally say 5-10 seconds would be reasonable (from a user PoV), but I guess I could accept up to 30 seconds (which would actually be a 5% regression from 2.5.19). But I am open for discussing/arguments on this topic. In particular, there is also the alternative of moving this into a separate check that is disabled in the default profile. Niels could you made a release. I have fixed it. The main problem is now the time of read and is incompressible. Bastien ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#745877: lintian: Unreasonable performance of detect_privacy_breach for clhep-doc/2.1.3.1-1/all
Processing control commands: severity -1 serious Bug #745877 [lintian] lintian: Unreasonable performance of detect_privacy_breach for clhep-doc/2.1.3.1-1/all Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 745877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745877 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745877: lintian: Unreasonable performance of detect_privacy_breach for clhep-doc/2.1.3.1-1/all
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: Control: severity -1 serious Hi, I noticed a similar complaint today - this time about gcc. * I believe the performance of this check to be inadequate and a disservice to Lintian's users. - With (what remains of) my Lintian maintainer hat, I consider this unsuitable for release. * I intend to revert / disable the checks within 14 days if they have not been improved considerable before then. - My best efforts[1] has been an improvement, but I still find it no where near acceptable performance. The files-check of libgcj-doc in 2.5.22.1 has a runtime of 1356s - that is 22 minutes! Even with our partial fix in the master branch, it is /only/ reduced to 605s or ~10 minutes! Ok what do you expect reasonable ? Bastien For comparison, I have made this little table to show the impact since 2.5.19 (the last version without the privacy-breaker tags): Wall-time Relative to 2.5.19 master 21m 30s 216% 2.5.22.1 36m 19s 364% 2.5.19 9m 57s 100% ~Niels [1] commit 60dcea84c2d5bbc4c2eb98c1361700d6e2c97ca6 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=60dcea84c2d5bbc4c2eb98c1361700d6e2c97ca6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745877: lintian: Unreasonable performance of detect_privacy_breach for clhep-doc/2.1.3.1-1/all
On 2014-06-17 22:18, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: [...] The files-check of libgcj-doc in 2.5.22.1 has a runtime of 1356s - that is 22 minutes! Even with our partial fix in the master branch, it is /only/ reduced to 605s or ~10 minutes! Ok what do you expect reasonable ? Bastien [...] Honestly, for the given case, I would personally say 5-10 seconds would be reasonable (from a user PoV), but I guess I could accept up to 30 seconds (which would actually be a 5% regression from 2.5.19). But I am open for discussing/arguments on this topic. In particular, there is also the alternative of moving this into a separate check that is disabled in the default profile. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
