Processed: Re: Bug#791165: libsdl-sge: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Processing control commands: severity -1 normal Bug #791165 [src:libsdl-sge] libsdl-sge: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 791165: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791165 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#791165: libsdl-sge: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Control: severity -1 normal On 08/02/2015 01:33 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: 2015-08-01 22:36 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: reopen 791165 severity 791165 serious tags 791165 + confirmed retitle 791165 libsdl-sge: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default thanks this is exactly what you should *not* do: libsdl-sge (030809dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium . * Bump Policy Standars-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) * Rebuild against GCC-5 (Closes: #791165) * Enable parallel compilation with dh * Fix mispelling in d/copyright (detected by lintian) Please rename the library package (and add a proper library version). Why not? I already explained in the bug report why IMO we don't need a transition: - no packages in Debian use the functions sorry, didn't see this. please could you mention this with your next upload in the changelog and then close the issue? In addition: - supertransball2 is going to be NMUd in the libstdc++ transition anyway - ruby-sdl has 200 reported installations in popcon, supertransball 129, infon-viewer 20 (the risk of breakage is not high, and it's in very unimportant packages) - it looks to me that RT are not very happy with unnecessary / gratuitous transitions [1], which to me it reads as if they can avoid them unless really needed [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/07/msg00333.html Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#791165: libsdl-sge: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
2015-08-01 22:36 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: reopen 791165 severity 791165 serious tags 791165 + confirmed retitle 791165 libsdl-sge: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default thanks this is exactly what you should *not* do: libsdl-sge (030809dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium . * Bump Policy Standars-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) * Rebuild against GCC-5 (Closes: #791165) * Enable parallel compilation with dh * Fix mispelling in d/copyright (detected by lintian) Please rename the library package (and add a proper library version). Why not? I already explained in the bug report why IMO we don't need a transition: - no packages in Debian use the functions In addition: - supertransball2 is going to be NMUd in the libstdc++ transition anyway - ruby-sdl has 200 reported installations in popcon, supertransball 129, infon-viewer 20 (the risk of breakage is not high, and it's in very unimportant packages) - it looks to me that RT are not very happy with unnecessary / gratuitous transitions [1], which to me it reads as if they can avoid them unless really needed [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/07/msg00333.html Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
