Bug#795888: botan1.10: FTBFS for non-amd64 processors: symbols not as expected

2015-08-17 Thread Ondřej Surý
I did try it first time, but obviously failed to use symbols tags. 

I will look at it probably tomorrow again. 

Ondřej 

On August 17, 2015 7:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org 
wrote:
Source: botan1.10
Version: 1.10.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

Builds of botan1.10 for architectures other than amd64 and
kfreebsd-amd64 have been failing with symbol mismatches, as detailed at

https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=botan1.10ver=1.10.10-2

The problem is worst on 32-bit architectures, on which some mangled
symbols have slightly different names because (e.g.) size_t is unsigned
int rather than unsigned long; however, I also see missing symbols on
other 64-bit architectures, mostly corresponding to processor-specific
variants of some code.

Could you please take a look?

Thanks!

-- 
Ondřej Surý



Bug#795888: botan1.10: FTBFS for non-amd64 processors: symbols not as expected

2015-08-17 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: botan1.10
Version: 1.10.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

Builds of botan1.10 for architectures other than amd64 and
kfreebsd-amd64 have been failing with symbol mismatches, as detailed at

https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=botan1.10ver=1.10.10-2

The problem is worst on 32-bit architectures, on which some mangled
symbols have slightly different names because (e.g.) size_t is unsigned
int rather than unsigned long; however, I also see missing symbols on
other 64-bit architectures, mostly corresponding to processor-specific
variants of some code.

Could you please take a look?

Thanks!