Bug#802713: Should audiopreview be removed?

2015-10-22 Thread Chris Taylor
I believe that it should be, yes.

-Chris


Processed: Re: Bug#802713: Should audiopreview be removed?

2015-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 802713 ftp.debian.org
Bug #802713 [audiopreview] Should audiopreview be removed?
Bug reassigned from package 'audiopreview' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #802713 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #802713 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle 802713 RM: audiopreview - dead upstream, unused, depends on legacy 
> libs
Bug #802713 [ftp.debian.org] Should audiopreview be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: audiopreview - dead upstream, unused, depends on 
legacy libs' from 'Should audiopreview be removed?'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
802713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802713
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#802713: Should audiopreview be removed?

2015-10-22 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
reassign 802713 ftp.debian.org
retitle 802713 RM: audiopreview - dead upstream, unused, depends on legacy libs
thanks

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:41:57PM -0700, Chris Taylor wrote:
> I believe that it should be, yes.

Ok. Reassigning the bug, then.

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#802713: Should audiopreview be removed?

2015-10-22 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: audiopreview
Severity: serious

- It's dead upstream and depends on legacy libs scheduled
for removal (gstreamer 0.10)
- Virtually unused according to popcon

Cheers,
Moritz