Bug#806246: cmucl: FTBFS (missing build-depends)

2015-12-13 Thread Peter Van Eynde
Hello Santiago,

> Seems like a missing Build-Depends on hardening-includes, the package
> containing /usr/share/hardening-includes/hardening.make, so it
> should be quite easy to fix.

Turns out it's not so easy after all, I'm still working on it...

> BTW: I wonder why this package does not exist for amd64. Is it a
> bootstrapping problem as the extended description suggests?

There is no upstream for amd64 (there was but it bitrotted). If you want
cmucl on amd64 then I suggest that you use sbcl which is a based on
cmucl, but with slightly different goals. One of which is having an
amd64 port ;).

Best regards, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/
God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson|



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#806246: cmucl: FTBFS (missing build-depends)

2015-11-25 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:cmucl
Version: 21a-2
Severity: serious

Dear maintainer:

I tried to build this package in a clean chroot and this is what
happened:


[...]
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
debian/rules:18: /usr/share/hardening-includes/hardening.make: No such file or 
directory
make: *** No rule to make target 
'/usr/share/hardening-includes/hardening.make'.  Stop.
dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2


Seems like a missing Build-Depends on hardening-includes, the package
containing /usr/share/hardening-includes/hardening.make, so it
should be quite easy to fix.

I would recommend that you try to build this package in a clean
environment to ensure that this does not happen. There are several
ways to do that. I use schroot myself, but pbuilder is also quite
popular.

BTW: I wonder why this package does not exist for amd64. Is it a
bootstrapping problem as the extended description suggests?

Thanks.