Bug#806867: python-scipy: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No module named scipy)

2016-10-04 Thread Julian Taylor 
On 04.10.2016 19:02, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Julian Taylor schrieb am 03.10.2016, 14:53 +0200:
>> where did you get the tarball from that you pushed to git?
>> its different from what uscan pulls and is missing all the documentation.
> Good question, I went to
> , more specifically
> .
> 
> If that's different from what's in the git repo, I might have made a mistake. 
> In
> this case, please be so kind to correct it.
> 
> Thanks
> 

hi,
you must be careful with tarballs from github tags, these are straight
dumps from git and do not include submodules.
Also they are missing postprocessing which e.g. make dist or setup.py
sdist do.

I will correct the git repository, please do not commit to it for now.
You also broke the binary-arch build in your changes (dpkg-buildpackage
-B), I will fix that too.

Bug#806867: python-scipy: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No module named scipy)

2016-10-04 Thread Sebastian Humenda 
Hi

Julian Taylor schrieb am 03.10.2016, 14:53 +0200:
>where did you get the tarball from that you pushed to git?
>its different from what uscan pulls and is missing all the documentation.
Good question, I went to
, more specifically
.

If that's different from what's in the git repo, I might have made a mistake. In
this case, please be so kind to correct it.

Thanks


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#806867: python-scipy: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No module named scipy)

2016-10-03 Thread Julian Taylor 
On 24.09.2016 23:26, Julian Taylor wrote:
> On 24.09.2016 23:14, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
>> Just to let people know: I'm working on it and hope to upload a new package
>> shortly.
>>
> 
> hm I wanted to do it tomorrow, but if you have it done go ahead.
> note there is a new upstream version that should be uploaded to fix
> other issues.
> 

where did you get the tarball from that you pushed to git?
its different from what uscan pulls and is missing all the documentation.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#806867: python-scipy: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No module named scipy)

2016-09-24 Thread Julian Taylor 
On 24.09.2016 23:14, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
> Just to let people know: I'm working on it and hope to upload a new package
> shortly.
> 

hm I wanted to do it tomorrow, but if you have it done go ahead.
note there is a new upstream version that should be uploaded to fix
other issues.

Bug#806867: python-scipy: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No module named scipy)

2016-09-24 Thread Sebastian Humenda 
Just to let people know: I'm working on it and hope to upload a new package
shortly.