Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:29:11 -0500
with message-id <20160203142911.gr18...@onerussian.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#812818: should dipy be removeed from debian?
has caused the Debian Bug report #812818,
regarding should dipy be removeed from debian?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
812818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812818
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dipy
Severity: serious
Dear dipy maintainer,
I know this may sound a bit harsh and premature, but I'm concerned by
the state of dipy in Debian.
The package is currently uninstallable due to the removal of a
dependency (that has been deprecated for 5 years now), and it's
unbuildable since more than 6 months (and the maintainers are aware of
it, as you can see in #785991#12).
A new upstream release since more or less that time.
From my restricted point of view there is no activity around it (I at
least se no changes in the public VCS).
As of now there are 2 RC bugs, the package is not in testing, there are
no reverse (build-)dependencies and the the popcon is resonably low.
Please, can you consider maintaining the package? Keeping an unusable
thing in the archive is not going to help our users in any way.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Little update -- we are ready with upload of most recent dipy release
0.10.1 but now it is hunted by regressions due to recent upload numpy
beta release. upstream is working on them and I hope that soonish they
would be resolved one way or another.
With this note I would like to close this issue, since dipy project and
its maintenance in debian is alive and kicking, only the 'unstable'
nature of unstable forbids its upload (without e.g. blunt
disabling failing unittests). So imho removal wouldn't be warranted
ATM, thus no reason for this "bug" to stay open.
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > As of now there are 2 RC bugs, the package is not in testing, there are
> > no reverse (build-)dependencies and the the popcon is resonably low.
> > Please, can you consider maintaining the package? Keeping an unusable
> > thing in the archive is not going to help our users in any way.
> Thanks for the buzz... we will fix it up in upcoming days
> Cheers!
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
--- End Message ---
