Your message dated Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:46:18 +0200
with message-id <58e61452-5c28-ff4d-e69c-7115e5bb0...@xs4all.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#833756: mapnik: FTBFS with gcc6/boost1.61/icu57
has caused the Debian Bug report #833756,
regarding mapnik: FTBFS with gcc6/boost1.61/icu57
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
833756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833756
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: mapnik
version: 3.0.11+ds-1
severity: serious

Dear maintainer,

your package failed to build on buildds during the transition to
boost1.61 and icu57 using gcc6 as a compiler.
you can see the failed build logs at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=mapnik&ver=3.0.11%2Bds-1%2Bb6&suite=sid

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 833756 mapnik/3.0.12~rc1+ds-1~exp1
thanks

Hi Mattia,

Thanks for caring about these transitions.

I'm well aware of the mapnik build failure with Boost 1.61 as I've been
following the transitions closely.

Mapnik 3.0.12-rc1 has support for Boost 1.61 and is available in
experimental along with the rest of the Mapnik family which needed to be
rebuilt with Mapnik 3.0.12 (along with changes for the new Mapnik).

I'm going to wait at least a week before moving the packages from
experimental to unstable. Hopefully Mapnik 3.0.12 final will be released
by then, along with a new node-mapnik that officially support 3.0.12. I
prefer to not have pre-releases in unstable. Ubuntu as usual has not
bothered to coordinate with the maintainers in Debian, and has already
synced the updated Mapnik packages from experimental, which I think is
premature.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to