Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.

2017-04-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 859255 normal
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 859255 binnmu
thanks

On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 15:24 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org

I fixed this last time, but didn't explicitly tell you.

release.debian.org bugs are *not* RC, please don't set them as such. The
packages that you're asking for binNMUs for might be broken, the release
metapackage is not.

Regards,

Adam



Processed: Re: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.

2017-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 859255 normal
Bug #859255 [release.debian.org] binNMU needed for more R packages.
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 859255 binnmu
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: binnmu.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
859255: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859255
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.

2017-04-01 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org

Hello again,

as a follow-up to #858183, I looked at which other R Bioconductor
packages were broken by R 3.3.3-1, and it seems that the previous round
of binNMUs did not repair some of them.

Can you make the followig binNMUs ?

nmu r-bioc-rsamtools_1.26.1-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3." 
nmu r-bioc-shortread_1.32.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3." 
nmu r-bioc-variantannotation_1.20.2-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3." 
nmu r-bioc-genomicalignments_1.10.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3." 

Note to debian-science: there are also R CRAN packages that fail with R
3.3.3, (r-cran-lubridate, r-cran-spam), but I am not yet sure if a
binNMU is enough.

Have a nice day,

Charles

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan