Bug#871300: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#871300: libmagick++-6.q16-7: requires rebuild against GCC 7 and symbols/shlibs bump

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 08/08/17 06:38, Bastien Roucaries wrote:
> Le 7 août 2017 22:59:06 GMT+02:00, James Cowgill  a 
> écrit :
>> On 07/08/17 16:55, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM,   wrote:
 Package: libmagick++-6.q16-7
 Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16
 Severity: serious
 Tags: sid buster
 User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
 Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling

>>>
>>> I need a change that break ABI, I will release a new version. Does it
>>> exist in this case a short cut
>>
>> If you are going to rename the Debian package and trigger a package
>> transition, you do not need to add any of the extra symbols/shlibs
>> stuff. You should still build-depend on gcc (>= 4:7) however - I'm not
>> sure if all the buildds use GCC 7 by default yet.
> 
>  Should i depends on g++7 for libmagick++-dev ?

I don't think you need to do that. Consumers of your library don't need
to be running gcc-7 (it should work with gcc-6 and gcc-7). Your library
does need to be built using gcc-7 so that it is compatible with both
compilers.

Thanks,
James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#871300: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#871300: libmagick++-6.q16-7: requires rebuild against GCC 7 and symbols/shlibs bump

[Bastien Roucaries]

Le 7 août 2017 22:59:06 GMT+02:00, James Cowgill  a écrit :
>Hi,
>
>On 07/08/17 16:55, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM,   wrote:
>>> Package: libmagick++-6.q16-7
>>> Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16
>>> Severity: serious
>>> Tags: sid buster
>>> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
>>> Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling
>>>
>> 
>> I need a change that break ABI, I will release a new version. Does it
>> exist in this case a short cut
>
>If you are going to rename the Debian package and trigger a package
>transition, you do not need to add any of the extra symbols/shlibs
>stuff. You should still build-depend on gcc (>= 4:7) however - I'm not
>sure if all the buildds use GCC 7 by default yet.


 Should i depends on g++7 for libmagick++-dev ?


>Thanks,
>James

-- 
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.

Bug#871300: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#871300: libmagick++-6.q16-7: requires rebuild against GCC 7 and symbols/shlibs bump

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 07/08/17 16:55, roucaries bastien wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM,   wrote:
>> Package: libmagick++-6.q16-7
>> Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: sid buster
>> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling
>>
> 
> I need a change that break ABI, I will release a new version. Does it
> exist in this case a short cut

If you are going to rename the Debian package and trigger a package
transition, you do not need to add any of the extra symbols/shlibs
stuff. You should still build-depend on gcc (>= 4:7) however - I'm not
sure if all the buildds use GCC 7 by default yet.

Thanks,
James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#871300: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#871300: libmagick++-6.q16-7: requires rebuild against GCC 7 and symbols/shlibs bump

[roucaries bastien]

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM,   wrote:
> Package: libmagick++-6.q16-7
> Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid buster
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling
>

I need a change that break ABI, I will release a new version. Does it
exist in this case a short cut

>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> ___
> Pkg-gmagick-im-team mailing list
> pkg-gmagick-im-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gmagick-im-team