Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:22:30 +0000
with message-id <e1exwci-0005ee...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#893272: fixed in aoflagger 2.10.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #893272,
regarding aoflagger FTBFS with glibc 2.27
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
893272: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893272
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: aoflagger
Version: 2.10.0-1
Severity: serious

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/aoflagger.html

...
In file included from 
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/histogramcollection.h:4:0,
                 from 
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/aoflagger.cpp:19:
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h: In member 
function 'double LogHistogram::const_iterator::binStart() const':
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:420:7: 
error: 'pow10' was not declared in this scope
       pow10(log10(_iterator->first)-0.005) :
       ^~~~~
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:420:7: 
note: suggested alternative: 'powl'
       pow10(log10(_iterator->first)-0.005) :
       ^~~~~
       powl
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h: In member 
function 'double LogHistogram::const_iterator::binEnd() const':
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:426:7: 
error: 'pow10' was not declared in this scope
       pow10(log10(_iterator->first)+0.005) :
       ^~~~~
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:426:7: 
note: suggested alternative: 'powl'
       pow10(log10(_iterator->first)+0.005) :
       ^~~~~
       powl
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h: In member 
function 'double LogHistogram::binStart(double) const':
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:493:5: 
error: 'pow10' was not declared in this scope
     pow10(log10(x)-0.005) :
     ^~~~~
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:493:5: 
note: suggested alternative: 'powl'
     pow10(log10(x)-0.005) :
     ^~~~~
     powl
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h: In member 
function 'double LogHistogram::binEnd(double) const':
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:499:5: 
error: 'pow10' was not declared in this scope
     pow10(log10(x)+0.005) :
     ^~~~~
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:499:5: 
note: suggested alternative: 'powl'
     pow10(log10(x)+0.005) :
     ^~~~~
     powl
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h: In static 
member function 'static double LogHistogram::getCentralAmplitude(double)':
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:506:12: 
error: 'pow10' was not declared in this scope
     return pow10(round(100.0*log10(amplitude))/100.0);
            ^~~~~
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:506:12: 
note: suggested alternative: 'powl'
     return pow10(round(100.0*log10(amplitude))/100.0);
            ^~~~~
            powl
/build/1st/aoflagger-2.10.0/src/interface/../quality/loghistogram.h:508:13: 
error: 'pow10' was not declared in this scope
     return -pow10(round(100.0*log10(-amplitude))/100.0);
             ^~~~~

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: aoflagger
Source-Version: 2.10.0-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
aoflagger, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 893...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ole Streicher <oleb...@debian.org> (supplier of updated aoflagger package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:08:04 +0100
Source: aoflagger
Binary: aoflagger libaoflagger0 aoflagger-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 2.10.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Astro Team <debian-astro-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ole Streicher <oleb...@debian.org>
Description:
 aoflagger  - Find RFI in radio astronomical observations
 aoflagger-dev - Find RFI in radio astronomical observations (development files)
 libaoflagger0 - Find RFI in radio astronomical observations (shared lib)
Closes: 893272
Changes:
 aoflagger (2.10.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Gijs Molenaar ]
   * Add pow10 patch. Closes: #893272
Checksums-Sha1:
 88844ff942ec32de897aa6b531b7af7b3023b66e 2447 aoflagger_2.10.0-2.dsc
 3f954daa647d77d67e46c77ba30945c0475c2ad6 9144 aoflagger_2.10.0-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 0c4ea6abd37a3251591c15a167cfc8cf01ac9323c27b9d8b3266b67f0a8dfece 2447 
aoflagger_2.10.0-2.dsc
 924bdcd4bddcb223b065e89225a3c83528cc4486474f1d4ff36d6cd49124d45c 9144 
aoflagger_2.10.0-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 c14d734045dce60784000c43cd8cdd9b 2447 science optional aoflagger_2.10.0-2.dsc
 08758c3c74f1313c66e0b6a09084e279 9144 science optional 
aoflagger_2.10.0-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=i313
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to