Bug#898433: FTBFS: README.md -> README.rst

[Lee Garrett]

Hi Daniel,

I've fixed it again. However, I'm not sure how this FTBFS for you. It built
fine before, and also on the buildds. Maybe you have some setting that turns
lintian warnings into errors?

Regards,
Lee

On 18/05/18 20:55, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Oh, I see what's happening.
> 
> Lee, can you do a -2 and make sure to merge against git on salsa?
> 
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Harlan Lieberman-Berg
>  wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I'm a bit confused as well.  I didn't upload any debs at all; I did a
>> source-only upload.  The buildd's successfully built -2 against the
>> original tarball that was uploaded with -1... and I just rebuilt it
>> again.
>>
>> Can you verify your source matches the sha256sum of
>> 5e817a3e077565bc1ff294d5a4748fbd8d78435fa721ebf617945568e45d603a?  You
>> can retrieve the original source with pristine-tar against the git
>> repository on salsa.
>>
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Daniel Baumann
>>  wrote:
>>> reopen 898433
>>> found 898433 2.5.3+dfsg-1
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks for fixing it, however, your last upload unfortunaly re-imports
>>> the problem.
>>>
>>> I'm a bit confused on how the package could have been built at all. The
>>> source package FTBFS'es, but you could upload the *_all.debs. Do you
>>> build from different sources than what is included in the source package?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harlan Lieberman-Berg
>> ~hlieberman
> 
> 
> 

Bug#898433: FTBFS: README.md -> README.rst

[Harlan Lieberman-Berg]

Oh, I see what's happening.

Lee, can you do a -2 and make sure to merge against git on salsa?

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Harlan Lieberman-Berg
 wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I'm a bit confused as well.  I didn't upload any debs at all; I did a
> source-only upload.  The buildd's successfully built -2 against the
> original tarball that was uploaded with -1... and I just rebuilt it
> again.
>
> Can you verify your source matches the sha256sum of
> 5e817a3e077565bc1ff294d5a4748fbd8d78435fa721ebf617945568e45d603a?  You
> can retrieve the original source with pristine-tar against the git
> repository on salsa.
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Daniel Baumann
>  wrote:
>> reopen 898433
>> found 898433 2.5.3+dfsg-1
>> thanks
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for fixing it, however, your last upload unfortunaly re-imports
>> the problem.
>>
>> I'm a bit confused on how the package could have been built at all. The
>> source package FTBFS'es, but you could upload the *_all.debs. Do you
>> build from different sources than what is included in the source package?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniel
>
>
>
> --
> Harlan Lieberman-Berg
> ~hlieberman



-- 
Harlan Lieberman-Berg
~hlieberman

Bug#898433: FTBFS: README.md -> README.rst

[Harlan Lieberman-Berg]

Hi Daniel,

I'm a bit confused as well.  I didn't upload any debs at all; I did a
source-only upload.  The buildd's successfully built -2 against the
original tarball that was uploaded with -1... and I just rebuilt it
again.

Can you verify your source matches the sha256sum of
5e817a3e077565bc1ff294d5a4748fbd8d78435fa721ebf617945568e45d603a?  You
can retrieve the original source with pristine-tar against the git
repository on salsa.

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Daniel Baumann
 wrote:
> reopen 898433
> found 898433 2.5.3+dfsg-1
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for fixing it, however, your last upload unfortunaly re-imports
> the problem.
>
> I'm a bit confused on how the package could have been built at all. The
> source package FTBFS'es, but you could upload the *_all.debs. Do you
> build from different sources than what is included in the source package?
>
> Regards,
> Daniel



-- 
Harlan Lieberman-Berg
~hlieberman

Bug#898433: FTBFS: README.md -> README.rst

[Daniel Baumann]

reopen 898433
found 898433 2.5.3+dfsg-1
thanks

Hi,

thanks for fixing it, however, your last upload unfortunaly re-imports
the problem.

I'm a bit confused on how the package could have been built at all. The
source package FTBFS'es, but you could upload the *_all.debs. Do you
build from different sources than what is included in the source package?

Regards,
Daniel

Bug#898433: FTBFS: README.md -> README.rst

[Daniel Baumann]

tag 898433 + patch
thanks

From: Daniel Baumann 
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 17:15:19 +0200
Subject: Updating docs to fix FTBFS (Closes: #898433).

---
 debian/docs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/debian/docs b/debian/docs
index b43bf86..a1320b1 100644
--- a/debian/docs
+++ b/debian/docs
@@ -1 +1 @@
-README.md
+README.rst
-- 

Regards,
Daniel

Bug#898433: FTBFS: README.md -> README.rst

[Daniel Baumann]

Package: ansible
Version: 2.5.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

thank you for maintaining ansible in Debian.

In upstream version 2.5.1, README.md was (as part of moving to sphinx)
renamed to README.rst. However, debian/docs still includes README.md
hence the 2.5.{1,2}+dfsg-1 packages fails to build from source.

I'll send the (trivial) patch to correct it after recieving the bug number.

Regards,
Daniel