Bug#917199: pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 6:30 AM Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Test cases that passed in patchelf 0.8 fail since 0.9, > > and segmentation fault on things like setting rpath > > might be close enough to "entirely broken". > > In that case, it would certainly help upstream if someone > (maintainer/porter) could try to "git bisect" the issue so that we can > better identify the issue. > > And maybe we want to revert to the former patchelf in Debian > (i.e. 0.9+really0.8) if it lasts too long. > The failing tests in 0.9 are new, in that the test is not the same as in 0.8. As I commented in the arch-RM bug, I don't think this is a regression (but I haven't checked at all). James Cowgill mentioned a change in glibc as the possible cause[1]. One way to test would be to run the test from 0.9 with the binary from 0.8. That said, I certainly welcome help. I'm completely overloaded right now so I can't look at this. [1] Thread at https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2016/04/msg4.html -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
Bug#917199: pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.
Hi, On Sun, 13 Jan 2019, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Test cases that passed in patchelf 0.8 fail since 0.9, > and segmentation fault on things like setting rpath > might be close enough to "entirely broken". In that case, it would certainly help upstream if someone (maintainer/porter) could try to "git bisect" the issue so that we can better identify the issue. And maybe we want to revert to the former patchelf in Debian (i.e. 0.9+really0.8) if it lasts too long. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
Bug#917199: pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 05:22:18PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > pyside2 is now built without patchelf on mips64el. > > > > Doing the same for mips and mipsel should fix the problem for pivy. > > Yeah, but this is not going in the right direction. This means that > pyside will be built with the embedded patchelf. The embedded patchelf is > outdated. But it will build and do its work... > > Really, if the test suite failure can't be fixed quickly, it would be > better to ignore the failure on the broken architectures and let the > package build anyway. It's unlikely that the tool is entirely broken... Test cases that passed in patchelf 0.8 fail since 0.9, and segmentation fault on things like setting rpath might be close enough to "entirely broken". > and it's just a pity to ask pyside to deal with a varying set of > architectures for patchelf. No disagreement on that, but unfortunately it seems to be the best available short-term fix. > Cheers, cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Bug#917199: pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.
Hi, On Sat, 12 Jan 2019, Adrian Bunk wrote: > pyside2 is now built without patchelf on mips64el. > > Doing the same for mips and mipsel should fix the problem for pivy. Yeah, but this is not going in the right direction. This means that pyside will be built with the embedded patchelf. The embedded patchelf is outdated. But it will build and do its work... Really, if the test suite failure can't be fixed quickly, it would be better to ignore the failure on the broken architectures and let the package build anyway. It's unlikely that the tool is entirely broken... and it's just a pity to ask pyside to deal with a varying set of architectures for patchelf. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
Bug#917199: pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.
Control: reassign -1 src:pyside2 Control: retitle -1 pyside2 should build without patchelf also on mips+mipsel Control: affects -1 src:pivy On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 11:47:26PM +, peter green wrote: > Package: pivy > Version: 0.6.4-1 > Severity: serious > > pivy cannot be built on mips/mipsel because of a depedency on pyside2 which > is not built on mips/mipsel pyside2 is not being built on those architectures > due to a dependency on patchelf. patchelf is not currently building on mips* > due to a testsuite failure. > > mips64el also looks like it will become a problem going forward as patchelf > is not currently available there (but was at the time pyside2 was last built). > > Possible solutions (in roughly descending order of preference): > > 1. Fix the patchelf testsuite failures. > 2. Break the dependency chain (only possible if the functionality in question > is optional, I have not researched that). >... pyside2 is now built without patchelf on mips64el. Doing the same for mips and mipsel should fix the problem for pivy. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Processed: Re: Bug#917199: pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:pyside2 Bug #917199 [pivy] pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf. Bug reassigned from package 'pivy' to 'src:pyside2'. No longer marked as found in versions 0.6.4-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #917199 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 pyside2 should build without patchelf also on mips+mipsel Bug #917199 [src:pyside2] pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf. Changed Bug title to 'pyside2 should build without patchelf also on mips+mipsel' from 'pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.'. > affects -1 src:pivy Bug #917199 [src:pyside2] pyside2 should build without patchelf also on mips+mipsel Added indication that 917199 affects src:pivy -- 917199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917199 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#917199: pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.
Package: pivy Version: 0.6.4-1 Severity: serious pivy cannot be built on mips/mipsel because of a depedency on pyside2 which is not built on mips/mipsel pyside2 is not being built on those architectures due to a dependency on patchelf. patchelf is not currently building on mips* due to a testsuite failure. mips64el also looks like it will become a problem going forward as patchelf is not currently available there (but was at the time pyside2 was last built). Possible solutions (in roughly descending order of preference): 1. Fix the patchelf testsuite failures. 2. Break the dependency chain (only possible if the functionality in question is optional, I have not researched that). 3. Request removal of the mips* binaries for pivy and reverse dependencies of pivy (if-any).
