Bug#923427: mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source breaks multi-line Binary fields
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 21:28:47 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > There shouldn't be debs in Files but not in Binaries. Which packages are > missing there? The test that I added using Salvatore's .changes file says the -dbgsym packages aren't listed in Binary: Warning: hyperv-daemons-dbgsym not found in Binary field 52a99bb89b091d9f88008b9b78bb 41354 debug extra hyperv-daemons-dbgsym_4.9.161-1_amd64.deb Warning: libcpupower1-dbgsym not found in Binary field dcf307126f4a0eebe135f8f20aea9d94 20096 debug extra libcpupower1-dbgsym_4.9.161-1_amd64.deb Warning: linux-cpupower-dbgsym not found in Binary field 28344bc7bcfa99bb67112ad8eab7d7b5 54550 debug extra linux-cpupower-dbgsym_4.9.161-1_amd64.deb Warning: linux-kbuild-4.9-dbgsym not found in Binary field ad6e009533db6131f7861b5eb881254e 488164 debug extra linux-kbuild-4.9-dbgsym_4.9.161-1_amd64.deb Warning: linux-perf-4.9-dbgsym not found in Binary field 93c6711fb982bad7df8a62ab1292ea87 4484002 debug extra linux-perf-4.9-dbgsym_4.9.161-1_amd64.deb Warning: usbip-dbgsym not found in Binary field 1b59f042a4a6780b0e76319950737bfe 92978 debug extra usbip-dbgsym_2.0+4.9.161-1_amd64.deb (repeated twice; the lines ending with .deb are quoting from Files) This seems like it might be a quirk of stretch's toolchain: if you look at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dpkg=amd64=1.18.25=1530308035=0 you'll see that dpkg-dbgsym and dselect-dbgsym aren't in Binary or Description either, whereas in https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dpkg=amd64=1.19.5=1550947218=0 they are in Binary but not Description. smcv
Processed: Re: Bug#923427: mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source breaks multi-line Binary fields
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source breaks multi-line Binary > fields Bug #923427 [devscripts] mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source mangles/breaks (valid?) Binary fields Changed Bug title to 'mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source breaks multi-line Binary fields' from 'mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source mangles/breaks (valid?) Binary fields'. > forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/merge_requests/112 Bug #923427 [devscripts] mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source breaks multi-line Binary fields Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/merge_requests/112'. > tags -1 + patch Bug #923427 [devscripts] mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source breaks multi-line Binary fields Added tag(s) patch. -- 923427: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923427 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#923427: mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source breaks multi-line Binary fields
Control: retitle -1 mergechanges: Regression: --indep/source breaks multi-line Binary fields Control: forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/merge_requests/112 Control: tags -1 + patch On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 17:59:25 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I'll try to put together some sort of parsing fix in shell for buster Try this: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/merge_requests/112 I've added Salvatore's changes file unmodified as a test-case, since it has a couple of interesting corner cases for the parser. To make mergechanges accept that changes file, I also had to make it more tolerant of packages that are in Files but not Binary, which apparently happens in stretch kernels? (Again, I didn't know this was even possible.) Regards, smcv
