Bug#955403: bedtools ftbfs, failing tests on armel, armhf, i386, mipsel

2020-04-15 Thread Andreas Tille 
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 03:55:42PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 03:48:02PM +0200, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> > 
> > I don't think dropping the 32bit archs is urgent right now.
> 
> I'm happy if you have a better solution, Andreas.

I'm not sure what qualifies for "urgent" but we have now:

   Bug#956828: src:bedtools: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on 
several archs

Is there any progress on this?

Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Bug#955403: bedtools ftbfs, failing tests on armel, armhf, i386, mipsel

2020-03-31 Thread Andreas Tille 
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 03:48:02PM +0200, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> 
> I don't think dropping the 32bit archs is urgent right now.

I'm happy if you have a better solution, Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Bug#955403: bedtools ftbfs, failing tests on armel, armhf, i386, mipsel

2020-03-31 Thread Michael Crusoe 
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:19 PM Andreas Tille  wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: src:bedtools
> > Version: 2.29.2+dfsg-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: sid bullseye
> >
> > bedtools ftbfs, failing tests on armel, armhf, i386, mipsel. All 32bit
> archs?
> >
> > [...]
> > --
> >  Test Results
> > --
> > Tools passing:  bamtobed bamtofastq bed12tobed6 bedtobam bigchroms
> closest
> > cluster complement coverage expand fisher flank general genomecov
> getfasta
> > groupby intersect jaccard makewindows map merge multicov reldist shift
> sort
> > spacing split subtract
> > Tools failing:  negativecontrol sample slop
> > NB: the 'negativecontrol' test is supposed to fail. If it wasn't caught,
>
> I wonder whether the most straightforward fix is to drop 32bit archs?
>

I don't think dropping the 32bit archs is urgent right now.

Bug#955403: bedtools ftbfs, failing tests on armel, armhf, i386, mipsel

2020-03-31 Thread Andreas Tille 
Hi Michael,

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:bedtools
> Version: 2.29.2+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> 
> bedtools ftbfs, failing tests on armel, armhf, i386, mipsel. All 32bit archs?
> 
> [...]
> --
>  Test Results
> --
> Tools passing:  bamtobed bamtofastq bed12tobed6 bedtobam bigchroms closest
> cluster complement coverage expand fisher flank general genomecov getfasta
> groupby intersect jaccard makewindows map merge multicov reldist shift sort
> spacing split subtract
> Tools failing:  negativecontrol sample slop
> NB: the 'negativecontrol' test is supposed to fail. If it wasn't caught,

I wonder whether the most straightforward fix is to drop 32bit archs?

What do you think?

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Bug#955403: bedtools ftbfs, failing tests on armel, armhf, i386, mipsel

2020-03-31 Thread Matthias Klose 
Package: src:bedtools
Version: 2.29.2+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye

bedtools ftbfs, failing tests on armel, armhf, i386, mipsel. All 32bit archs?

[...]
--
 Test Results
--
Tools passing:  bamtobed bamtofastq bed12tobed6 bedtobam bigchroms closest
cluster complement coverage expand fisher flank general genomecov getfasta
groupby intersect jaccard makewindows map merge multicov reldist shift sort
spacing split subtract
Tools failing:  negativecontrol sample slop
NB: the 'negativecontrol' test is supposed to fail. If it wasn't caught,
something went wrong with this test script.
make[2]: *** [Makefile:220: test] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/<>'