Bug#958414: marked as pending in equivs
Hi Josch, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > But then again, in the meanwhile we know that this isn't a packaging > > issue but an LXC issue (https://bugs.debian.org/961584) and hence should be > > able to ignore it. > > The salsa CI team implemented a workaround for that 10 days ago: > > https://lists.debian.org/120987bc-e315-d1ee-c86f-05f0220b66e2@malerba.space Oh, I wasn't aware of that. I subscribed to #961584 and thought, I'd get informed that way when it is fixed. Seems as if that didn't work out. :-) So thanks for that hint! > I restarted the pipeline and all is green now: > > https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/equivs/pipelines/145020 Yay! Sorry, I didn't try periodically to see if it works again since I expected that it won't work anyway until #961584 is fixed. I planned to restart the pipelines once #961584 is fixed. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Bug#958414: marked as pending in equivs
Hi Axel, Quoting Axel Beckert (2020-06-09 16:26:59) > > But it's now two weeks since this was fixed in git and no upload has > > happened even though this bug is RC severity. > > This was mostly because autopkgtests were, well, are still failing on > Salsa and it was initially unclear, why. > > But then again, in the meanwhile we know that this isn't a packaging > issue but an LXC issue (https://bugs.debian.org/961584) and hence should be > able to ignore it. The salsa CI team implemented a workaround for that 10 days ago: https://lists.debian.org/120987bc-e315-d1ee-c86f-05f0220b66e2@malerba.space I restarted the pipeline and all is green now: https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/equivs/pipelines/145020 > (Assuming that testing migration doesn't rely on Salsa pipelines.) It does not. Testing migration is gated by the result of autopkgtest runs on ci.debian.net and not on salsa ci. > So thanks for the reminder on this. > > > Would you mind me doing an NMU of equivs? > > Admittedly, yes. Will see if I can manage an upload this evening. Thank you!! :) cheers, josch signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#958414: marked as pending in equivs
Hi Josch, Johannes Schauer wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2020 17:52:16 + Axel Beckert wrote: > > Bug #958414 in equivs reported by you has been fixed in the > > Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit > > message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/equivs/-/commit/1f342aea93c5b2f0554439accb16eae23ea3f6b5 > > thanks for the fix! > > But it's now two weeks since this was fixed in git and no upload has happened > even though this bug is RC severity. This was mostly because autopkgtests were, well, are still failing on Salsa and it was initially unclear, why. But then again, in the meanwhile we know that this isn't a packaging issue but an LXC issue (https://bugs.debian.org/961584) and hence should be able to ignore it. (Assuming that testing migration doesn't rely on Salsa pipelines.) So thanks for the reminder on this. > Would you mind me doing an NMU of equivs? Admittedly, yes. Will see if I can manage an upload this evening. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Bug#958414: marked as pending in equivs
Hi, On Tue, 26 May 2020 17:52:16 + Axel Beckert wrote: > Bug #958414 in equivs reported by you has been fixed in the > Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit > message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: > > https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/equivs/-/commit/1f342aea93c5b2f0554439accb16eae23ea3f6b5 thanks for the fix! But it's now two weeks since this was fixed in git and no upload has happened even though this bug is RC severity. Would you mind me doing an NMU of equivs? Thanks! cheers, josch signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#958414: marked as pending in equivs
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #958414 in equivs reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/equivs/-/commit/1f342aea93c5b2f0554439accb16eae23ea3f6b5 Don't let dpkg-buildpackage check for build-dependencies It implicitly and unconditionally adds build-essential which equivs-generated metapackages don't need in nearly any case. Closes: #958414 Thanks Johannes 'josch' Schauer! (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/958414
Processed: Bug#958414 marked as pending in equivs
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #958414 [equivs] Latest equivs version 2.3.0 breaks mk-build-deps Added tag(s) pending. -- 958414: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958414 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
