Bug#971296: rekall: Switch to python3-pycryptodome

2021-01-13 Thread Hilko Bengen
* Sascha Steinbiss:

> Just bringing this up again... I would be in favour of removing it
> completely. Would be happy to file a RM from unstable if there are no
> objections.

I agree and have filed the RM bug.

Cheers,
-Hilko



Bug#971296: rekall: Switch to python3-pycryptodome

2021-01-13 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi all,

[..]> I just discovered that rekall is no longer maintained at the upstream
> level so I'm wondering if we should not just remove the package.
> 
> Hilko, Sascha, what do you think?

Just bringing this up again... I would be in favour of removing it
completely. Would be happy to file a RM from unstable if there are no
objections.

Cheers
Sascha



Bug#971296: rekall: Switch to python3-pycryptodome

2020-11-30 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi everyone,

[...]
> I just discovered that rekall is no longer maintained at the upstream
> level so I'm wondering if we should not just remove the package.
> 
> Hilko, Sascha, what do you think?

I would be fine with removing it as at least I don't have much interest
in it any more anyway. It was a dependency for GRR which has not even
been part of buster. Hilko, what do you think?

[...]
> For the time being, I increase the severity of the bug to get it out of
> testing.

OK with me.

Cheers
Sascha



Processed: Re: Bug#971296: rekall: Switch to python3-pycryptodome

2020-11-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #971296 [src:rekall] rekall: Switch to python3-pycryptodome
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
971296: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971296
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems