Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:58:57 -0400 with message-id <87sfxq0xbi....@transcendence.maguirefamily.org> and subject line Re: src:fricas: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer built arch:all binaries has caused the Debian Bug report #993478, regarding src:fricas: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer built arch:all binaries to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 993478: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993478 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: fricas Version: 1.3.6-6 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.3.7-1 Tags: sid bookworm pending User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), As announced [1] last year, the Release Team now considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:fricas has been trying to migrate for 62 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable. Your package is only really blocked because the arch:all binary package(s) aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg00005.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=fricasOpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1.3.6-6 Greetings, and thank you so much for your report! I have uploaded several identical versions of the package. The build only fails on one host, arm-conova-02, whether building armhf or armel, and when exercising orthogonal sections of linker code. The failure is unreproducible on Debian porterboxes. All other autobuilders in either architecture correctly build the package. The armel and armhf autobuilders have successfully built 1.3.7-3 at the moment so migration is imminent. I will follow up with debian admin and request access to the offending machine to investigate further, but this is a problem with the machine, not the package, as far as can be discerned at present. Take care, -- Camm Maguire c...@maguirefamily.org ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
--- End Message ---