Your message dated Tue, 14 Dec 2021 21:22:22 +0000
with message-id <e1mxffe-000gpx...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#998914: fixed in lostirc 0.4.6-4.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #998914,
regarding lostirc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or 
build-indep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998914: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998914
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lostirc
Version: 0.4.6-4.2
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep

Dear maintainer,

Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be
affected by this issue.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html .
The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month.

Best,

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lostirc
Source-Version: 0.4.6-4.3
Done: Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lostirc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 998...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> (supplier of updated lostirc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 23:40:00 +0100
Source: lostirc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.4.6-4.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Braure de Calignon <braur...@free.fr>
Changed-By: Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org>
Closes: 998914
Changes:
 lostirc (0.4.6-4.3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/control: switch to debhelper-compat (= 13)
   * debian/compat: removed
   * debian/rules: add missing targets (Closes: #998914)
Checksums-Sha1:
 8f91ef92410c66c70ce0e6def6556c047ea64943 1888 lostirc_0.4.6-4.3.dsc
 c968011762aa39cd1366784be5469ab5960018d7 12782 lostirc_0.4.6-4.3.diff.gz
 ea465d517e275162dd899a85951d088ff3dd5b18 5951 
lostirc_0.4.6-4.3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 343bdf55ae118295867e5c2c0ea39cac805de13f5f2cdfb3c24822dbe7e78b73 1888 
lostirc_0.4.6-4.3.dsc
 e1e4c5e9d8992c5ae3af6324e157a9c46c8ed161b39e9419623df22a91f90269 12782 
lostirc_0.4.6-4.3.diff.gz
 4dda01a22b400fa9341eee14e1d3f1f764ae51284a250dd6137cf6458ea43050 5951 
lostirc_0.4.6-4.3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 84052c7e8f24595f399c8e504572199a 1888 net optional lostirc_0.4.6-4.3.dsc
 adb6c67c93bdd1c522a490483d18e6af 12782 net optional lostirc_0.4.6-4.3.diff.gz
 9b0532bbb2bdd7debcc360c34a0d0412 5951 net optional 
lostirc_0.4.6-4.3_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5+B0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to